Corrigendum to: Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects (European Journal of Oral Sciences, (2016), 124, 2, (105-118), 10.1111/eos.12250);Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: Systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 105-118

  Papageorgiou, Spyridon N ^a   Gölz, Lina ^a   Jäger, Andreas ^a   Eliades, Theodore ^b   Bourauel, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fixed appliances; Labial appliances; Lingual appliances; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TONGUE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TONGUE;

EID: 84960228629     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12338     Document Type: Erratum

References (58)

1. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2013 JCO orthodontic practice study. Part 1: trends. J Clin Orthod 2013; 47: 661-680.
2. Rosvall MD, Fields HW, Ziuchkovski J, Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 135: 276.e1-276.e12.
3. Fujita K. New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket and mushroom arch wire appliance. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 657-675.
4. Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, Davidovitch M, Vardimon AD. Anchorage loss - a multifactorial response. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 730-737.
5. Ye L, Kula KS. Status of lingual orthodontics. World J Orthod 2006; 7: 361-368.
6. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 350-363.
7. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jäger A, Bourauel C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17: 197-215.
8. Long H, Zhou Y, Pyakurel U, Liao L, Jian F, Xue J, Ye N, Yang X, Wang Y, Lai W. Comparison of adverse effects between lingual and labial orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 1066-1073.
9. Mistakidis I, Katib H, Vasilakos G, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N. Clinical outcomes of lingual orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2015; [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv061.
10. Papageorgiou SN, Xavier GM, Cobourne MT. Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1512-1522.
11. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I-How to choose effect measure and statistical model. J Orthod 2014; 41: 317-326.
12. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II-Is all that glitters gold? J Orthod 2014; 41: 327-336.
13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the J Clin Epidemiol. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 380-382.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009; 172: 137-159.
15. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA; PRISMA-P GROUP. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015; 349: g7647.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed October 15th 2015.
17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: e1-e34.
18. Papageorgiou SN, Keilig L, Hasan I, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015; [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv050.
19. Papageorgiou SN, Tsiranidou E, Antonoglou GN, Deschner J, Jäger A. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 534-541.
20. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3127-3131.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558.
22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560.
23. Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses. BMJ 2007; 335: 914-916.
24. Orsini N, Bottai M, Higgins J, Buchan I. Heterogi: Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistical Software Components 2006. www.EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s449201. Accessed August 15 2015.
25. Ioannidis JP. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 951-957.
26. Sloan J, Symonds T, Vargas-Chanes D, Fridley B. Practical guidelines for assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life changes within clinical trials. Drug Inf J 2006; 37: 23-31.
27. Knapp G, Hartung J. Improved tests for a random-effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat Med 2003; 22: 2693-2710.
28. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-34.
29. Caniklioglu C, Öztürk Y. Patient discomfort: a comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 86-91.
30. Khattab TZ, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R, Hajeer MY, Haj-Hamed Y. Speech performance and oral impairments with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances in the first stage of fixed treatment. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 519-526.
31. Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15: 561-566.
32. Lombardo L, Ortan YO, Gorgun O, Panza C, Scuzzo G, Siciliani G. Changes in the oral environment after placement of lingual and labial orthodontic appliances. Prog Orthod 2013; 14: 28.
33. Rai AK, Ganeshkar SV, Rozario JE. Parametric and nonparametric assessment of speech changes in labial and lingual orthodontics: a prospective study. APOS Trends Orthod 2013; 3: 99-109.
34. Rai AK, Rozario JE, Ganeshkar SV. Comparison of speech performance in labial and lingual orthodontic patients: a prospective study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014; 11: 663-675.
35. Shalish M, Cooper-Kazaz R, Ivgi I, Canetti L, Tsur B, Bachar E, Chaushu S. Adult patients' adjustability to orthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between Labial, Lingual, and Invisalign. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 724-730.
36. Soldanova M. Comparison of treatment effectiveness lingual apparatus 2D and apparatus straight wire. Olomouc: Palacký University, 2011; (MSc Thesis).
37. Soldanova M, Leseticky O, Komarkova L, Dostalova T, Smutny V, Spidlen M. Effectiveness of treatment of adult patients with the straightwire technique and the lingual two-dimensional appliance. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 674-680.
38. van der Veen MH, Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference? Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 298-303.
39. Venkatesh S, Rozario J, Ganeshkar SV, Ajmera S. Comparative evaluation of sagittal anchorage loss in lingual and labial appliances during space closure: a pilot study. APOS Trends Orthod 2015; 5: 33-37.
40. Wu AK, McGrath C, Wong RW, Wiechmann D, Rabie AB. A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 403-407.
41. Wu A, McGrath C, Wong RW, Wiechmann D, Rabie AB. Comparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011; 139: 784-790.
42. Sinclair PM, Cannito MF, Goates LJ, Solomos LF, Alexander CM. Patient responses to lingual appliance. J Clin Orthod 1986; 20: 396-404.
43. Artun JA. A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded lingual appliances in lingual orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 204-210.
44. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 1966; 80: 1-28.
45. Jones M, Chan C. The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 373-381.
46. Sergel HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontics treatment - causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 684-691.
47. Hohoff A, Seifert S, Fillion D, Stamm T, Heinecke A, Ehmer U. Speech performance in lingual orthodontic patients measured by sonagraphy and auditive analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123: 146-152.
48. Hohoff A, Fillion D, Stamm T, Goder G, Sauerland C, Ehmer U. Oral comfort, function and hygiene in patients with lingual brackets. J Orofac Orthop 2003; 64: 359-371.
49. Kurz C, Bennett R. Extraction cases and the lingual appliance. J Am Ling Orthod Assoc 1988; 3: 10-13.
50. Stamm T, Hohoff A, Ehmer U. A subjective comparison of two lingual bracket systems. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 420-426.
51. Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 322-327.
52. Britse A, Lagerlöf F. The diluting effect of saliva on the sucrose concentration in different parts of the human mouth after a mouth-rinse with sucrose. Arch Oral Biol 1987; 32: 755-756.
53. Jensen B, Bratthall D. A new method for the estimation of Streptococci mutans in human saliva. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 468-471.
54. Nishimura M, Oda T, Kariya N, Matsumura S, Shimono T. Using a caries activity test to predict caries risk in early childhood. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 63-71.
55. Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 35-37.
56. Papageorgiou SN, Antonoglou GN, Tsiranidou E, Jepsen S, Jäger A. Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 984-992.
57. Papageorgiou SN, Kloukos D, Petridis H, Pandis N. Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties. J Dent 2015; 43: 1195-1202.
58. Pandis N, Fleming PS, Hopewell S, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2015; 147: 663-679.