An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues

Nature Methods

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 959-962

  Corces, M Ryan ^a   Trevino, Alexandro E ^a   Hamilton, Emily G ^a   Greenside, Peyton G ^a   Sinnott Armstrong, Nicholas A ^a   Vesuna, Sam ^a   Satpathy, Ansuman T ^a   Rubin, Adam J ^a   Montine, Kathleen S ^a   Wu, Beijing ^a   Kathiria, Arwa ^a   Cho, Seung Woo ^a   Mumbach, Maxwell R ^a   Carter, Ava C ^a   Kasowski, Maya ^a   Orloff, Lisa A ^a   Risca, Viviana I ^a   Kundaje, Anshul ^a,b   Khavari, Paul A ^a   Montine, Thomas J ^a   Greenleaf, William J ^a,c   Chang, Howard Y ^a   more..

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c CHAN ZUCKERBERG BIOHUB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; TRANSPOSASE; DNA;

ARTICLE; ASSAY; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; FREEZING; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KERATINOCYTE; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BRAIN; ERYTHROCYTE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE BASED AMPLIFICATION; PROCEDURES; SPECIMEN HANDLING; THYROID TUMOR;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CELL LINE; DNA; ERYTHROCYTES; FREEZING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; MICE; SELF-SUSTAINED SEQUENCE REPLICATION; SPECIMEN HANDLING; THYROID NEOPLASMS; TRANSPOSASES;

EID: 85030994641     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4396     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Nat. Methods 10, 1213-1218 (2013).
2. Jin, W. et al. Nature 528, 142-146 (2015).
3. Roadmap Epigenetics Consortium. et al. Nature 518, 317-330 (2015).
4. Koues, O. I. et al. Cell 165, 1134-1146 (2016).
5. Shih, H. Y. et al. Cell 165, 1120-1133 (2016).
6. Wu, J. et al. Nature 534, 652-657 (2016).
7. Gray, L. T. et al. eLife 6, e21883 (2017).
8. Scott, L. J. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 11764 (2016).
9. Xu, J. et al. Nat. Genet. 49, 377-386 (2017).
10. Bao, X. et al. Genome Biol. 16, 284 (2015).
11. Corces, M. R. et al. Nat. Genet. 48, 1193-1203 (2016).
12. The ENCODE Project Consortium. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
13. Konopka, G. et al. Neuron 75, 601-617 (2012).
14. Henneman, W. J. P. et al. Neurology 72, 999-1007 (2009).
15. Filippini, N. et al. Neurology 75, 1645-1652 (2010).
16. Jones, A. R. et al. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 2234. e1-2234. e7 (2013).
17. Corces, M. R. et al. Protocol Exchange http://dx. doi. org/10. 1038/ protex. 2017. 096 (2017).
18. Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21. 29. 1-21. 29. 9 (2015).
19. Mo, A. et al. Neuron 86, 1369-1384 (2015).
20. Piper, J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e201 (2013).
21. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
22. Leslie, R., O'Donnell, C. J. & Johnson, A. D. Bioinformatics 30, i185-i194 (2014).
23. Maurano, M. T. et al. Science 337, 1190-1195 (2012).
24. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
25. Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. bioRxiv 110346 (2017).
26. Picelli, S. et al. Genome Res. 24, 2033-2040 (2014).