A fast and exhaustive method for heterogeneity and epistasis analysis based on multi-objective optimization

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2017, Pages 2829-2836

  Li, Xiong ^a  

^a EAST CHINA JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; ENTROPY; EPISTASIS; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ENTROPY; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85029816699     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx339     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abo,A.S. and Farnir,F. (2017) KNN-MDR: a learning approach for improving interactions mapping performances in genome wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics, 18, 184.
2. Deb,K. et al. (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGAII. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 6, 182-197.
3. Fenger,M. et al. (2008) Analysis of heterogeneity and epistasis in physiological mixed populations by combined structural equation modelling and latent class analysis. BMC Genet., 9, 43.
4. Gabriel,C.A. et al. (2013) Association of progesterone receptor gene (PGR) variants and breast cancer risk in African American women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 139, 833-843.
5. Gonzalez-Domnguez,J. et al. (2015) Parallel pairwise epistasis detection on heterogeneous computing architectures. IEEE T Parall. Distr., 27, 2329-2340.
6. Jiang,X. et al. (2011) Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 89.
7. Jing,P.J. and Shen,H.B. (2015) MACOED: a multi-objective ant colony optimization algorithm for SNP epistasis detection in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics, 31, 634-641.
8. Moore,J.H. et al. (2006) A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. J. Theor. Biol., 241, 252-261.
9. Moore,J.H. et al. (2010) Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 26, 445-455.
10. Skwark,M.J. et al. (2017) Interacting networks of resistance, virulence and core machinery genes identified by genome-wide epistasis analysis. PLoS Genet., 13, e1006508.
11. Tuo,S. et al. (2016) FHSA-SED: two-locus model detection for genome-wide association study with harmony search algorithm. Plos One, 11, e0150669.
12. Urbanowicz,R.J. et al. (2012) GAMETES: a fast, direct algorithm for generating pure, strict, epistaticmodelswith random architectures. BioDataMin., 5, 16.
13. Urbanowicz,R.J. et al. (2013) Role of genetic heterogeneity and epistasis in bladder cancer susceptibility and outcome: a learning classifier system approach. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 20, 603-612.
14. Weeks,N.T. et al. (2016) High-performance epistasis detection in quantitative trait GWAS. Int. J. High Perform. C, 1-16.
15. Wu,T.T. et al. (2009) Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression. Bioinformatics, 25, 714-721.
16. Xie,M. et al. (2012) Detecting genome-wide epistases based on the clustering of relatively frequent items. Bioinformatics, 28, 5-12.
17. Yang,C.H. et al. (2013) Evaluation of breast cancer susceptibility using improved genetic algorithms to generate genotype SNP barcodes. IEEE ACM T. Comput. Biol., 10, 361-371.
18. Zeng,Z. et al. (2016) Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain. BMC Bioinformatics, 17, 221