Towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data with FHIR

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Leroux, Hugo ^a   Metke Jimenez, Alejandro ^a   Lawley, Michael J ^a  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

CDISC ODM; Clinical research data; FHIR; Interoperability; Longitudinal clinical study

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PROCEDURES; SEMANTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 85029743610     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-017-0148-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T, de Brock B, Hillege H. Deficiencies in the transfer and availability of clinical trials evidence: a review of existing systems and standards. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2012; 12(1):95.
2. Hsu W, Gonzalez NR, Chien A, Villablanca JP, Pajukanta P, Viñuela F, Bui AA. An integrated, ontology-driven approach to constructing observational databases for research. J Biomed Inform. 2015; 55:132-42.
3. Hume S, Aerts J, Sarnikar S, Huser V. Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review. J Biomed Inform. 2016; 60:352-62.
4. CDISC: Specification for the Operational Data Model (ODM). 2006. http://www.cdisc.org/odm-v1-3-2. Accessed 26 July 2017.
5. FDA: Study data technical conformance guide. 2016. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/UCM384744.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017.
6. Lefort L, Leroux H. Design and generation of linked clinical data cubes. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Semantic Statistics (SemStats 2013). Sydney: CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 2013.
7. Leroux H, Lefort L. Semantic enrichment of longitudinal clinical study data using the CDISC standards and the semantic statistics vocabularies. J Biomed Semantics. 2015; 6(1):16.
8. Leroux H, Metke-Jimenez A, Lawley MJ. ODM on FHIR: Towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data. In: Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS). Cambridge: CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 2015.
9. Bruland P, Breil B, Fritz F, Dugas M. Interoperability in clinical research: from metadata registries to semantically annotated CDISC ODM. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 180:564-8.
10. Huser V, Sastry C, Breymaier M, Idriss A, Cimino JJ. Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM). J Biomed Inform. 2015; 57:88-99.
11. Richesson RL, Nadkarni P. Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(3):341-6. http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/3/341.full.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017.
12. Leroux H, McBride S, Gibson S. On selecting a clinical trial management system for large scale, multi-centre, multi-modal clinical research study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 168:89-95.
13. Leroux H, McBride S, Lefort L, Kemp M, Gibson S. A method for the semantic enrichment of clinical trial data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012; 178:111-6.
14. ISO: Semantic Interoperability of health information. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783642225017-c7.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017.
15. Macía I. Towards a semantic interoperability environment. In: e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2014 IEEE 16th International Conference On. IEEE: 2014. p. 543-8. doi: 10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001900.
16. CDISC: Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH) v1.1. 2006. http://www.cdisc.org/cdash/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
17. BRIDG: The Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) Model. 2016. http://www.bridgmodel.org/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
18. Abler D, Crichton C, Welch J, Davies J, Harris S. Models for forms. In: Proceedings of the Compilation of the Co-located Workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE!'11, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'11. ACM: 2011. p. 13-18. doi: 10.1145/2095050.2095054.
19. Leroux H, Lefort L. Using CDISC ODM and the RDF Data Cube for the semantic enrichment of longitudinal clinical trial data. In: Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS). Paris: CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 2012.
20. HL, 7: Fast Healthcare Interoperable Resources. 2015. http://hl7.org/fhir/overview.html. Accessed 26 July 2017.
21. HL, 7: Argonaut project. 2016. http://argonautwiki.hl7.org/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
22. ADHA: National Clinical Terminology Service. 2016. http://www.healthterminologies.gov.au/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
23. HL, 7: Organizations interested in FHIR. 2016. https://www.cdisc.org/standards/domain-information-module/bridg. Accessed 26 July 2017.
24. Kubick W. CR 3.0 - A Manifesto for The Next Generation of Clinical Research Data Standards. 2016. https://waynekubick.com/2016/08/30/cr-3-0-a-manifesto-for-the-next-generation-of-clinical-research-data-standards/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
25. Dugas M. ODM2CDA and CDA2ODM: Tools to convert documentation forms between EDC and EHR systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2015; 15(1):40.
26. HL, 7: FHIR-I. 2016. http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/fiwg/index.cfm. Accessed 26 July 2017.
27. HL, 7: RCRIM. 2016. http://www.hl7.org/Special/Committees/rcrim/index.cfm. Accessed 26 July 2017.
28. Handler J. The importance of accurate blood pressure measurement. Permanente J. 2009; 13(3):51-4.
29. WHO: WHO Trial Registration Data Set (Version 1.2.1). 2016. http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/trds/en/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
30. CDISC: Protocol Representation Model v1. 2010. http://www.cdisc.org/protocol. Accessed 26 July 2017.
31. Tao C, Jiang G, Oniki TA, Freimuth RR, Zhu Q, Sharma D, Pathak J, Huff SM, Chute CG. A semantic-web oriented representation of the clinical element model for secondary use of electronic health records data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(3):554-62. http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/3/554.full.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017.
32. Santos MR, Bax MP, Kalra D. Building a logical EHR architecture based on ISO 13606 standard and semantic web technologies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 160(Pt 1):161-5.
33. Declerck G, Hussain S, Daniel C, Yuksel M, Laleci GB, Twagirumukiza M, Jaulent MC. Bridging data models and terminologies to support adverse drug event reporting using EHR data. Methods Inf Med. 2015; 54(1):24-31.
34. Laleci GB, Yuksel M, Dogac A. Providing semantic interoperability between clinical care and clinical research domains. Biomed Health Inform IEEE J. 2013; 17(2):356-69.
35. Jiang G, Evans J, Endle CM, Solbrig HR, Chute CG. Using semantic web technologies for the generation of domain-specific templates to support clinical study metadata standards. J Biomed Semant. 2016; 7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s13326-016-0053-5.
36. Vadakin A, Hinkson B. Organizing and Accelerating the Clinical Research Process from the Beginning: The CDISC Protocol Representation Model and Toolkit. 2012. http://www.cdisc.org/system/files/all/standard_category/application/pdf/prm_document___april_2012fin.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017.
37. Cyganiak R, Reynolds D, Tennison J. The RDF Data Cube Vocabulary. World Wide Web Consortium. 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-vocab-data-cube-20131217/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
38. Bosch T, Cyganiak R, Wackerow J, Zapilko B. Leveraging the DDI Model for Linked Statistical Data in the Social, Behavioural, and Economic Sciences. 2012. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: 2012. p. 46-55. http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/viewFile/3654/1877.
39. HL, 7: RDF for Semantic Interoperability. 2016. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability. Accessed 26 July 2017.
40. Dameron O, Besana P, Zekri O, Bourdé A, Burgun A, Cuggia M, et al. OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information. J Biomed Semant. 2013; 4:17.
41. HL, 7: FHIR Mapping Language. 2016. http://build.fhir.org/mapping-language.html. Accessed 26 July 2017.
42. O'Connor MJ, Shankar RD, Parrish DB, Das AK. Knowledge-data integration for temporal reasoning in a clinical trial system. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78:77-85.
43. W, 3C: Extensible Markup Language. 2016. https://www.w3.org/XML/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
44. Leroux H, Metke-Jimenez A, Lawley MJ. Achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data with FHIR. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303839490_Achieving_semantic_interoperability_of_clinical_study_data_with_FHIR. Accessed 26 July 2017.
45. HL, 7: FHIR Build Process. 2016. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Build_Process. Accessed 26 July 2017.
46. HL, 7: FHIR Guide to Designing Resources. 2016. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Guide_to_Designing_Resources. Accessed 26 July 2017.
47. HL, 7: Resource Formats. 2016. http://build.fhir.org/formats.html. Accessed 26 July 2017.