Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 60, Issue , 2016, Pages 352-362

  Hume, Sam ^a   Aerts, Jozef ^b   Sarnikar, Surendra ^a   Huser, Vojtech ^c  

^a DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FH JOANNEUM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

CDISC; Clinical trial; Define XML; EHR; Interoperability; ODM

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INTEROPERABILITY; LIFE CYCLE; METADATA; SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION;

CDISC; CLINICAL DATA INTERCHANGE STANDARDS CONSORTIUMS; CLINICAL RESEARCH INFORMATICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; REAL-TIME DATA EXCHANGE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SOLUTION COMPONENTS;

ODOR CONTROL;

CLINICAL DATA INTERCHANGE STANDARDS CONSORTIUM OPERATIONAL DATA MODEL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA SYNTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; ALGORITHM; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS; STANDARDS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84960409047     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.016     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. CDISC, Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2014 .
2. C. Forster, G. Vossen, Exploiting XML Technologies in Medical Information Systems, in: BLED 2012, 2012.
3. FDA, Study Data Specifications v1.5.1, FDA, 2010.
4. FDA, Transport Format for the Submission of Regulatory Study Data; Notice of Pilot Project, D.o.H.a.H. Services (Ed.), United States Government: Federal Register, 2013, pp. 70954-70955.
5. ONC, The Standards and Interoperability Framework, 2015 (27-Jan-2015). .
6. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362(5):382-385.
7. FDA, Availability of Masked and De-identified Non-Summary Safety and Efficacy Data; Request for Comments, D.o.H.a.H. Services (Ed.), United States Government: Federal Register, 2013, pp. 33421-33423.
8. K. Getz, Technology Regulation Consolidation and Study Volunteer Trends, 2013.
9. Kubick W.R., Ruberg S., Helton E. Toward a comprehensive CDISC submission data standard. Drug Inform. J. 2007, 41(3):373-382.
10. FDA, Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures - Scope and Application, FDA (Ed.), 2003, FDA.gov.
11. Garde S., et al. Can openEHR archetypes empower multi-centre clinical research?. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2005, 116:971-976.
12. S. Hume, Connecting at the Connectathon, in: Applied Clinical Trials, 2001, UBM Advanstar.
13. Ngouongo S., Löbe M., Stausberg J. The ISO/IEC 11179 norm for metadata registries: does it cover healthcare standards in empirical research?. J. Biomed. Inform. 2013, 46(2):318-327.
14. CDISC, Define-XML Specification Version 2.0, CDISC, 2013.
15. CDISC, CDISC Dataset-XML Specification Version 1.0, Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2014.
16. CDISC, CDISC Study Design Model in XML (SDM-XML), Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2011.
17. CDISC, Representing Controlled Terminology in ODM, CDISC, 2011.
18. CDISC, Analysis Results Metadata Specification Version 1.0 for Define-XML Version 2 - Draft, Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium: CDISC, 2014.
19. CDISC, Overview of the CDISC Operational Data Model for Clinical Data Acquisition and Archive (based on CDISC ODM DTD 1.1 DRAFT), CDISC, 2001.
20. De Moor G., et al. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, 53:162-173.
21. Laleci G.B., Yuksel M., Dogac A. Providing semantic interoperability between clinical care and clinical research domains. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2013, 17(2):356-369.
22. Bruland P., Dugas M. Transformations between CDISC ODM and openEHR Archetypes. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2014, 205:1225.
23. Breil B., Dugas M. Analyses of medical data models-identifying common concepts and items in a repository of medical forms. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2012, 192. 1052-1052.
24. CDISC, Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH), Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2011.
25. C. Daniel et al., Standard-based integration profiles for clinical research and patient safety, in: AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 2013, 2013, p. 47.
26. Ohmann C., Kuchinke W. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Meth. Inform. Med. 2009, 48(1):45-54.
27. Kush R., et al. Implementing single source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 14(5):662-673.
28. Anastasiou A., Ifeachor E., Zajicek J. Data modeling methods in clinical trials: experiences from the clinical trial methods in neurodegenerative diseases project. Trials 2011, 12(Suppl. 1):A15.
29. CDISC, Leveraging the CDISC Standards to Facilitate the use of Electronic Source Data within Clinical Trials, CDISC eSDI Group, 2006.
30. Alschuler L., Bain L., Kush R. Improving data collection for patient care and clinical trials. Sci. Career Mag. Mar. 2004, 26.
31. A.N. El Fadly et al., CDA Template for eCRFs REUSE Project, in: International HL7 Interoperability Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
32. El Fadly A.N., et al. Integrating clinical research with the healthcare enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. J. Biomed. Inform. 2011, 44:S94-S102.
33. Breil B., et al. Multilingual medical data models in ODM format-a novel form-based approach to semantic interoperability between routine health-care and clinical research. Appl. Clin. Inf. 2012, 3:276-289.
34. El Fadly A., et al. Electronic Healthcare Record and clinical research in cardiovascular radiology. HL7 CDA and CDISC ODM interoperability. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2007, American Medical Informatics Association.
35. G.B.L. Erturkmen et al., Building the semantic interoperability architecture enabling sustainable proactive post market safety studies, 2011.
36. Fadly A., et al. Aligning HL7 CDA Templates and CDISC ODM: An Experiment in Cardiovascular Radiology. Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics; Building Sustainable Health Systems 2007, IOS Press.
37. P. Bruland, C. Forster, M. Dugas, x4T-EDC: a prototype for study documentation based on the single source concept, in: 24th International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, 2012.
38. Dziuballe P., et al. The single source architecture x4T to connect medical documentation and clinical research. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2010, 169:902-906.
39. Bruland P., et al. Does single-source create an added value? Evaluating the impact of introducing x4T into the clinical routine on workflow modifications, data quality and cost-benefit. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2014, 83(12):915-928.
40. CDISC, CDISC Healthcare Link Initiative, 2014 (cited 2014 18-Dec-2014). .
41. El Fadly A., et al. The REUSE project: EHR as single datasource for biomedical research. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2010, 160(Pt 2):1324-1328.
42. Bernhard B., et al. HIS-based Kaplan-Meier plots-a single source approach for documenting and reusing routine survival information. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2011, 11.
43. Krumm R., et al. The need for harmonized structured documentation and chances of secondary use-Results of a systematic analysis with automated form comparison for prostate and breast cancer. J. Biomed. Inform. 2014.
44. Marcos M., et al. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility. J. Biomed. Inform. 2013, 46(4):676-689.
45. Richesson R.L., Nadkarni P. Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2011, 18(3):341-346.
46. Ganslandt T., et al. Unlocking data for clinical research - The German i2b2 Experience. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2011, 2(1):116.
47. Aerts J. Generating a caBIG patient study calendar from a study design in ODM with study design model extension. CDISC J. 2011.
48. Nepochatov N.S. Translational research web application framework. Transl. Res. 2009.
49. Willoughby C., et al. A standard computable clinical trial protocol: the role of the BRIDG model. Drug Inform. J. 2007, 41(3):383-392.
50. G. Karam, International clinical trials registry platform, in: CDISC European Interchange 2014, Paris, France, 2014.
51. V. Huser, Using CDISC standards to create formal and computable representations of human clinical research protocols, in: NIH Research Festival, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 2014.
52. G.M. De Melo, J. Nagler-Ihlein, M. Weber. Generating user interfaces from CDISC ODM for mobile devices, in: International Conference on Mobile Business, 2006, ICMB'06, IEEE, 2006.
53. Tröger E., et al. Ophthabase: a generic extensible patient registry system. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008, 86(s243).
54. C. Crichton et al., Metadata-driven software for clinical trials, in: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering in Health Care, IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
55. E. Domínguez et al., Model-driven development based transformation of stereotyped class diagrams to XML schemas in a healthcare context, Advances in Conceptual Modeling-Foundations and Applications, 2007, pp. 44-53.
56. Fu L.L., Chen T. Web-based case report form design for clinical trial. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 39:19-24.
57. Kiuchi T., et al. Legal medicine information system using CDISC ODM. Leg. Med. 2013, 15(6):332-334.
58. Kuchinke W., et al. Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions. Methods Inf. Med. 2006, 45(4):441.
59. J. Yeom, S. Jung, H. Kim, Language Supports for Multinational Clinical Trials in CDISC Platform, 2013.
60. Bruland P., et al. Interoperability in clinical research: from metadata registries to semantically annotated CDISC ODM. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2012, 180:564.
61. Breil B., et al. Semantic enrichment of medical forms-semi-automated coding of ODM-elements via web services. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2011, 180:1102-1104.
62. Dugas M., Dugas-Breit S. Integrated data management for clinical studies: automatic transformation of data models with semantic annotations for principal investigators, data managers and statisticians. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(2):e90492.
63. LillyODMLibrary, E.L.a. Company (Ed.), 2012 (no longer available). .
64. M. Dugas, B. Breil, Open Medical Data Models: A Prototype of an Exchange Platform for Medical Forms, 2012.
65. Shabo A., Rabinovici-Cohen S., Vortman P. Revolutionary impact of XML on biomedical information interoperability. IBM Syst. J. 2006, 45(2):361-372.
66. D. Abler et al., Models for forms, in: Proceedings of the Compilation of the Co-located Workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE!'11, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'11, ACM, 2011.
67. J. Davies et al., The cancergrid experience: metadata-based model-driven engineering for clinical trials. Science of Computer Programming, 2013.
68. Nadkarni P.M., Kemp R., Parikh C. Leveraging a clinical research information system to assist biospecimen data and workflow management: a hybrid approach. J. Clin. Bioinform. 2011, 1:22.
69. CDISC, CDISC SHARE, 2015 (27-Jan-2015). .
70. CDISC, CDISC Protocol Representation Model Version 1.0, CDISC: cdisc.org, 2010.
71. Huser V., et al. Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: an assessment of the suitability of the clinical data interchange standards consortium (CDISC) operational data model (ODM). J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, 57:88-99.
72. CDISC, Specification for the Operational Data Model, Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2013.
73. P.-Y. Lastic, The Convergence of Healthcare and Clinical Research Standards, 2007.
74. Souza T., Kush R., Evans J.P. Global clinical data interchange standards are here!. Drug Discov. Today 2007, 12(3):174-181.
75. J. Bickel, J. Gregoric, i2b2 Community: ODM to i2b2 importer, 2014 (29-Nov-2014). .
76. G. Jiang et al., A collaborative framework for representation and harmonization of clinical study data elements using semantic MediaWiki, in: AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 2010, 2010, p. 11.
77. T.M. Deserno et al., Integrating image management and analysis into OpenClinica using web services, in: SPIE Medical Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013.
78. D. Haak et al., OC ToGo: bed site image integration into OpenClinica with mobile devices, in: SPIE Medical Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014.
79. F. Lingli, D. Sheng, C. Tao, Clinical data management system, in: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (ICBECS), 2010, 2010.
80. S.A. Wang et al., Performance of using Oracle XMLDB in the evaluation of CDISC ODM for a clinical study informatics system, in: 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2004, CBMS 2004, Proceedings, IEEE, 2004.
81. Dugas M., et al. Automated UMLS-based comparison of medical forms. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(7):e67883.
82. H. Leroux, L. Lefort, Using CDISC ODM and the RDF data cube for the semantic enrichment of longitudinal clinical trial data, in: SWAT4LS, Citeseer, 2012.
83. Brandt C.A., et al. Metadata-driven creation of data marts from an EAV-modeled clinical research database. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2002, 65(3):225-242.
84. L. Lefort, H. Leroux, Design and generation of linked clinical data cubes, in: 1st International Workshop on Semantic Statistics (SemStats), 2013.
85. Fridsma D.B., et al. The BRIDG project: a technical report. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008, 15(2):130-137.
86. CDISC, ODM Certified Products 2014. .
87. FDA, Electronic Case Report Form Submission; Notice of Pilot Project, D.o.H.a.H. Services (Ed.), Federal Register, 2007, pp. 11370-11371.
88. BRIDG, BRIDG Model Release 3.2 User's Guide, BRIDG Semantic Coordination Committee: NCI, 2012.
89. M. Wheeldon, K. Burges, Discover Define-XML, in: PharmaSUG 2014, San Diego, CA, 2014.
90. J. Maddox, Round trip ticket - using the define.xml file to send and receive your study specifications, in: PhUSE 2013, Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
91. J. Maddox, Round trip ticket - using the define.xml file to send and receive your study specifications, in: PhamaSUG 2014, San Diego, CA, 2014.
92. G. Lightfoot, L. Jansen, Two-way Ticket, Please. . . All aboard the SAS® Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.5 Express, in: PhUSE 2013, Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
93. H. Leroux et al., A method for the semantic enrichment of clinical trial data, in: Health Informatics: Building a Healthcare Future Through Trusted Information: Selected Papers from the 20th Australian National Health Informatics Conference (HIC 2012), IOS Press, 2012.
94. FDA, C. CDER (Ed.), Study Data Technical Conformance Guide, FDA, 2014.
95. OpenCDISC, 2014. .
96. J. Aerts, XML4Pharma 2014. .
97. Kuchinke W., et al. CDISC standard-based electronic archiving of clinical trials. Methods Inf. Med. 2009, 48(5):408.
98. G. Grieve, E. Kramer, L. McKenzie, Introduction to HL7 FHIR, in: HL7 Working Group Meeting, Baltimore, MD: HL7, 2012.
99. IOM, Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2015.
100. A. Newbigging, Using web service technologies for incremental, real-time data transfers from EDC to SAS, in: PhUSE 2010, PhUSE, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
101. D. Raths, Top ten tech trends: catching FHIR, in: Healthcare Informatics, Vendome Healthcare Media, 2014, .
102. H. Leroux, A. Metke-Jimenez, M. Lawley, ODM on FHIR: towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data, in: SWAT4LS International Conference, Cambridge, England, 2015.
103. D. Chhatre, A. Malla, CDER/CBER's Top 7 CDISC Standards Issues, FDA, 2012.
104. A. Dootson, Tracing data elements through a standard data flow, in: PhUSE 2011, PhUSE, Brighton, UK, 2011.
105. W. Kubick, 2015 CDISC Technical Plan, CDISC: cdisc.org, 2015.
106. FDA, CDER Common Data Standards Issues Document Version 1.1, FDA, 2011.
107. Kush R., Goldman M. Fostering responsible data sharing through standards. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370(23):2163.
108. L. Hoyle et al., Comprehensive Citation Across the Data Life Cycle Using DDI, 2014.