Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: Current status and challenges

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 341-346

  Richesson, Rachel L ^a   Nadkarni, Prakash ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; NOMENCLATURE; STANDARD; SUPPORT GROUP; VALIDATION STUDY; WORKFLOW;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 79958255131     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000107     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Iso-Iec. Information TechnologydMetadata Registries (MDR), in Part 1: Framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization/ International Electrotechnical Commission, 2004. http://metadata-stds.org/11179/#A1.
2. Souza T, Kush R, Evans JP. Global clinical data interchange standards are here! Drug Discov Today 2007;12:174-81.
3. Levin R. Data Standards for Regulated Clinical Trials: FDA Perspective. 2005. http://www.cdisc.org/pdf/2004_06_14_cdisc.pdf (accessed 21 Jul 2006).
4. Welker JA. Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutions. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:329-36.
5. ClinfoSource I. E-Training for Clinical Trials. On-line Training Session. 2008. https://www.clinfosource.com/documents/brochureII.pdf (accessed 14 Mar 2011).
6. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1983:247.
7. Gore SM. Assessing clinical trialsdrecord sheets. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1981;283:296-8.
8. Crewson Applegate KE PE. Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists. Am J Reontgenol 2001;177:755-61.
9. Lu Z. Technical challenges in designing post-marketing eCRFs to address clinical safety and pharmacovigilance needs. Contemp Clin Trials 2010;31:108-18.
10. CDISC. Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization: Basic Data Collection Fields for Case Report Forms. Draft version 1.0. http://www.cdisc.org/cdash (accessed 1 Sep 2010).
11. Leslie H. International developments in openEHR archetypes and templates. HIM J 2008;37:38-9.
12. Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S. The openEHR foundation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005;115:153-73.
13. Browne E. Archetypes for HL7 CDA Documents. 2008. http://www.openehr.org/wiki/download/attachments/3440870/Archetypes_in_CDA_4.pdf (accessed 14 Mar 2011).
14. McNamara RL, Brass LM, Drozda JP, et al. ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical data standards (Writing Commitee to Develop Data Standards on Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:475-95.
15. Buxton AE, Calkins H, Callans DJ, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology). Circulation 006;114:2534-70.
16. Ohmann C, Kuchinke W. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med 2009;48:45-54.
17. NCI. caBIG. Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid. Data Standards. 2006 01-04-2008. https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/workspaces/VCDE/Data_Standards/index_html/ (accessed 25 May 2006).
18. Nahm M, McCourt B, Walden A, et al. Cardiovascular and Tuberculosis Data Standards, Release 1.0, Package 1. 2008. http://www.cdisc.org/standards/cardio/index.html (accessed 23 Nov 2010).
19. Stone K. NINDS common data element project: a long-awaited breakthrough in streamlining trials. Ann Neurol 68:A11-13.
20. NINDS. NINDS Common Data Elements. Harmonizing Information. Streamlining Research. Project Overview. 2010 Aug 19 http://www.commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/ProjReview.aspx (accessed 20 Aug 2010).
21. Stover PJ, Harlan WR, Hammond JA, et al. PhenX: a toolkit for interdisciplinary genetics research. Curr Opin Lipidol 2010;21:136-40.
22. Richesson RL, Mon D, Kallem C, et al. A Strategy for Defining Common Data Elements to Support Clinical Care and Secondary Use in Clinical Research, in 2010 AMIA Clinical Research Informatics Summit. San Francisco, 2010. http://crisummit2010.amia.org/files/symposium2008/100_richesson.pdf. (accessed 14 Mar 2011)
23. HL7. Diabe-DS Project Wikid'EHR Diabetes Data Strategy.' 2010 http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=EHR_Diabetes_Data_Strategy (accessed 23 Nov 2010).
24. ANSI. Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP). Enabling Healthcare Interoperability. 2010. http://www.hitsp.org/ (accessed 23 Nov 2010).
25. Kuperman GJ, Blair JS, Franck RA, et al. Developing data content specifications for the nationwide health information network trial implementations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:6-12.
26. Nadkarni PM, Brandt CA. The common data elements for cancer research: remarks on functions and structure. Methods Inf Med 2006;45:594-601.
27. Warzel DB, Andonaydis C, McCurry B, et al. Common data element (CDE) management and deployment in clinical trials. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:1048.
28. Covitz PA, Hartel F, Schaefer C, et al. caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics. Bioinformatics 2003;19:2404-12.
29. AHRQ. The United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK). 2010. http://ushik.ahrq.gov/index.html?Referer=Index (accessed 23 Nov 2010).
30. Richesson RL, Krischer JP. Data standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:687-96.
31. Fridsma DB, Evans J, Hastak S, et al. The BRIDG project: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:130-7.
32. Phillips L. The Double Metaphone Search Algorithm, in C/C++ Users Journal. 2000. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=349132 (accessed 18 Mar 2011).
33. Blaha M. Data store models are different from data interchange models. Electr Notes Theor Comp Sci 2004;94:51-8.
34. Hamilton M. Rating depressive patients. J Clin Psychiatry 1980;41 (12 Pt 2):21-4.
35. Williams JBW, Link MJ, Rosenthal NE, et al. Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorders Version (SIGHSAD). New York: New York Psychiatric Institute, 1988.
36. EMA. ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice; CPMP/ICH/135/95. 59. 2002. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf (accessed 14 Mar 2011).
37. Aday LA. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996:560.
38. Poksinska B, Kahlgaard JJ, Antoni M. The state of ISO 9000 certification: A study of Swedish organisations. TQM Mag 14, 2002. doi:10.1108/09544780210439734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780210439734, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=842040&show=abstract.
39. Tsim YC, Yeung VWS, Leung ETC. An adaptation to ISO 9001:2000 for certified organisations. Managerial Auditing Journal 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686900210429669. 2002. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=868561&show=abstract.
40. Donabedian A. Quality assurance. Structure, process and outcome. Nurs Stand 1992;7(11 Suppl QA):4-5.
41. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring: Vol. 1. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.
42. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:166-206.
43. FDA. Guidance for Industry. Qualification Process for Drug Development Tools. DRAFT GUIDANCE.F.a.D.A.C.f.D.E.a.R. (CDER). 2010. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM230597.pdf (accessed 14 Mar 2011).
44. Stausberg J, Löbe M, Verplancke P, et al. Foundations of a metadata repository for databases of registers and trials. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:409-13.
45. Brandt CA, Cohen DB, Shifman MA, et al. Approaches and informatics tools to assist in the integration of similar clinical research questionnaires. Methods Inf Med 2004;43:156-62.
46. Richesson R, Shereff D, Andrews J. [RD] PRISM Library: patient registry item specifications and metadata for rare diseases. J Libr Metadata 2010;10:119-35.
47. Chute CG. Medical concept representation. In: Chen H, Fuller SS, Friedman C, et al, eds. Medical Informatics. Knowledge Management and Data Mining in Biomedicine. New York: Springer, 2005:163-82.
48. Mead CN. Data interchange standards in healthcare IT: computable semantic interoperability: now possible but still difficult, do we really need a better mousetrap? J Healthcare Inf Manag 2006;20:71-8.
49. Rector AL. The Interface Between Information, Terminology, and Inference Models. In: Tenth World Conference on Medical and Health Informatics: MedInfo-2001. London, 2001.
50. IHTSDO. SNOMED CT Style Guide: Situations with Explicit Context? International Healthcare Terminology Standards Development Organization, Copenhagen, 2008.
51. Raloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measure 1977;1:385-401.
52. Bakken S, Cimino JJ, Haskell R, et al. Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:529-38.