Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the highly sensitive child scale and identification of sensitivity groups

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 51-70

  Pluess, Michael ^a   Assary, Elham ^a   Lionetti, Francesca ^a   Lester, Kathryn J ^b   Krapohl, Eva ^c   Aron, Elaine N ^d   Aron, Arthur ^d  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential susceptibility; Environmental Sensitivity; Personality; Temperament

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY TEST; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; TEMPERAMENT; TWINS; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; ENVIRONMENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY, ADOLESCENT; PSYCHOLOGY, CHILD; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; TEMPERAMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85029579024     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000406     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Acevedo, B. P., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Sangster, M. D., Collins, N., & Brown, L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: An fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4, 580-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.242
2. Albert, D., Belsky, D. W., Crowley, D. M., Latendresse, S. J., Aliev, F., Riley, B., the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2015). Can genetics predict response to complex behavioral interventions? Evidence from a genetic analysis of the Fast Track Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 497-518. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.21811
3. Aron, E. N. (1996). The highly sensitive person: How to thrive when the world overwhelms you (rev. ed.). New York, NY: Broadway Books.
4. Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514 .73.2.345
5. Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Davies, K. M. (2005). Adult shyness: The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 181-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271419
6. Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262-282. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
7. Assary, E., Zavos, H. M., Krapohl, E., Keers, R., & Pluess, M. (2017). Sensitivity to environmental influences is a heritable trait. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Beaver, J. D., Lawrence, A. D., van Ditzhuijzen, J., Davis, M. H., Woods, A., & Calder, A. J. (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5160-5166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0350-06.2006
9. Belsky, J. (1997a). Theory testing, effect-size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: The case of mothering and attachment. Child Development, 68, 598-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 1132110
10. Belsky, J. (1997b). Variation in susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182-186. http://dx.doi .org/10.1207/s15327965pli0803_3
11. Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Development (pp. 139-163). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x
13. Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. (2009). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 746-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.44
14. Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017376
15. Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013). Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1243-1261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457941 300059X
16. Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., & Owen, M. T., & the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78, 681-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007 .01021.x
17. Booth, C., Standage, H., & Fox, E. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 24-29. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.020
18. Bornstein, M. H., & Bradley, R. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. London, UK: Routledge.
19. Borries, F. (2012). Do the "highly sensitive" exist? A taxonometric investigation of the personality construct sensory processing sensitivity (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). University of Bielefeld, Germany.
20. Boterberg, S., & Warreyn, P. (2016). Making sense of it all: The impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .paid.2015.12.022
21. Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271-301. http://dx .doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050145
22. Brown, H. M., Eley, T. C., Broeren, S., Macleod, C., Rinck, M., Hadwin, J. A., & Lester, K. J. (2014). Psychometric properties of reaction time based experimental paradigms measuring anxiety-related informationprocessing biases in children. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.004
23. Capaldi, D. M., & Rothbart, M. K. (1992). Development and validation of an early adolescent temperament measure. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 153-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027243169201200 2002
24. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral-Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment-the Bis Bas Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
25. Chen, C., Chen, C., Moyzis, R., Stern, H., He, Q., Li, H., Dong, Q. (2011). Contributions of dopamine-related genes and environmental factors to highly sensitive personality: A multi-step neuronal systemlevel approach. PLoS ONE, 6, e21636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal .pone.0021636
26. Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr41 02_5
27. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
28. de Haan, A. D., Prinzie, P., & Dekovíc, M. (2010). How and why children change in aggression and delinquency from childhood to adolescence: Moderation of overreactive parenting by child personality. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 725-733. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02192.x
29. Donley, S., Fine, A., Simmons, C., Pluess, M., & Cauffman, E. (2016). Environmental sensitivity among juvenile offenders: Do some juvenile offenders benefit from positive home environments more than others?
30. Ellis, B. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2008). Biological sensitivity to context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 183-187.
31. Ellis, B. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: Toward an understanding of sensitivity to developmental experiences and context. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457941000060X
32. Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary-Neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611
33. Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868-888. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.002
34. Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2008). Temperamental sensitivity: Two constructs or one? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 108-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.016
35. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135
36. Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts performance on a visual search task followed by an increase in perceived stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 496-500. http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.019
37. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246-276). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_8
38. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39. Haworth, C. M., Davis, O. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 117-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ thg.2012.91
40. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
41. Heponiemi, T., Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., Puttonen, S., & Ravaja, N. (2003). BIS/BAS sensitivity and self-rated affects during experimentally induced stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 943-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00079-X
42. Ho, M. Y., Cheung, F. M., You, J., Kam, C., Zhang, X., & Kliewer, W. (2013). The moderating role of emotional stability in the relationship between exposure to violence and anxiety and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 634-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .paid.2013.05.004
43. IBMCorp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
44. Jagiellowicz, J., Xu, X., Aron, A., Aron, E., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2011). The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 38-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq001
45. Kagan, J. (1989). Temperamental contributions to social behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 668-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X .44.4.668
46. Kagan, J. (1997). Temperament and the reactions to unfamiliarity. Child Development, 68, 139-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131931
47. Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Snidman, N. (1987). The physiology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in children. Child Development, 58, 1459-1473. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130685
48. Keers, R., Coleman, J. R., Lester, K. J., Roberts, S., Breen, G., Thastum, M., Eley, T. C. (2016). A genome-wide test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis reveals a genetic predictor of differential response to psychological treatments for child anxiety disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85, 146-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/ 000444023
49. Kim, S., & Kochanska, G. (2012). Child temperament moderates effects of parent-child mutuality on self-regulation: A relationship-based path for emotionally negative infants. Child Development, 83, 1275-1289. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01778.x
50. Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M., Dale, P. S., Plomin, R., Weinberg, R. A., Thomson, J. M., & Fischer, K. W. (2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development). London, UK: Blackwell.
51. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Jr., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 1040-3590.11.3.326
52. Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2017). Dandelions, tulips, and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low, medium, and high sensitive individuals in the general population. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53. Liss, M., Mailloux, J., & Erchull, M. J. (2008). The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 255-259. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.009
54. Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551-611). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366253
56. McNaughton, N., & Gray, J. A. (2000). Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 161-176. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00344-X
57. Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 406-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.406
58. Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Jamerson, J. E., Samuel, D. B., Olson, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment, 13, 119-137. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/1073191106286748
59. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
60. Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Pluess, M. (2017). Environmental sensitivity predicts treatment response to anti-bullying intervention: Evidence of vantage sensitivity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
61. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
62. Obradovíc, J., & Boyce, W. T. (2009). Individual differences in behavioral, physiological, and genetic sensitivities to contexts: Implications for development and adaptation. Developmental Neuroscience, 31, 300-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000216541
63. Obradovíc, J., Bush, N. R., Stamperdahl, J., Adler, N. E., & Boyce, W. T. (2010). Biological sensitivity to context: The interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 81, 270-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j .1467-8624.2009.01394.x
64. Pastore, M. (2016). Overlapping: Estimation of overlapping in empirical distribution. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ overlapping/index.html
65. Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 138-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ cdep.12120
66. Pluess, M. (2017). Vantage sensitivity: Environmental sensitivity to positive experiences as a function of genetic differences. Journal of Personality, 85, 38-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12218
67. Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Developmental Psychology, 46, 379-390. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/a0015203
68. Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030196
69. Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2015). Vantage sensitivity: Genetic susceptibility to effects of positive experiences. In M. Pluess (Ed.), Genetics of psychological well-being (pp. 193-210). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686674.003.0012
70. Pluess, M., & Boniwell, I. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of vantage sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 40-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011
71. Pluess, M., Boniwell, I., Hefferon, K., & Tunariu, A. (2017). Preliminary evaluation of a school-based resilience-promoting intervention in a high-risk population: Application of an exploratory two-cohort treatment/ control design. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177191. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1371/journal.pone.0177191
72. Pluess, M., Velders, F. P., Belsky, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Jaddoe, V. W., Tiemeier, H. (2011). Serotonin transporter polymorphism moderates effects of prenatal maternal anxiety on infant negative emotionality. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 520-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.006
73. Putnam, S. P., Ellis, L. K., & Rothbart, M. K. (2001). The structure of temperament from infancy through adolescence. In A. Eliasz & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Advances in research on temperament (pp. 165-182). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
74. Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389-409. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1017/S0954579412000065
75. Rosseels, Y. (2016). Package lavaan. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project .org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf
76. Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorrs (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis (pp. 233-247). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4603-0_17
77. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23-74.
78. semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=semTools
79. Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Dekovíc, M., & van Aken, M. A. (2016). Differences in sensitivity to parenting depending on child temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1068-1110. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/bul0000061
80. Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Denissen, J. J., Dekovíc, M., & van Aken, M. A. (2015). Personality traits as potential susceptibility markers: Differential susceptibility to support among parents. Journal of Personality, 83, 155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12091
81. Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., van Aken, M. A. G., Ellis, B., & Dekovíc, M. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Manuscript submitted for publication.
82. Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and "Big Five." Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269-1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022
83. Snyder, H. R., Gulley, L. D., Bijttebier, P., Hartman, C. A., Oldehinkel, A. J., Mezulis, A., Hankin, B. L. (2015). Adolescent emotionality and effortful control: Core latent constructs and links to psychopathology and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1132-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000047
84. Sobocko, K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2015). Trait sensory-processing sensitivity and subjective well-being: Distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 44-49. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.045
85. van IJzendoorn, M. H., Belsky, J., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). Serotonin transporter genotype 5HTTLPR as a marker of differential susceptibility? A meta-analysis of child and adolescent gene-byenvironment studies. Translational Psychiatry, 2, e147. http://dx.doi .org/10.1038/tp.2012.73
86. Van Os, J., & Jones, P. B. (1999). Early risk factors and adult person-Environment relationships in affective disorder. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1055-1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291799001026
87. Walda, S. A. E. (2007). Hoogsensitiviteit bij kinderen in het basisonderwijs [High sensitivity in children from regular education]. Unpublished Master's thesis. Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.annabosman.eu/documents/SietskeWalda2007.pdf
88. Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., & Weissing, F. J. (2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 15825-15830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.080547 3105
89. Woodward, S. A., Lenzenweger, M. F., Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. (2000). Taxonic structure of infant reactivity: Evidence from a taxometric perspective. Psychological Science, 11, 296-301. http://dx .doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00259
90. Zuckerman, M. (1999). Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/10316-000