Estimating forest structural parameters using canopy metrics derived from airborne LiDAR data in subtropical forests

Remote Sensing

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2017, Pages

  Zhang, Zhengnan ^a   Cao, Lin ^a   She, Guanghui ^a  

^a NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Canopy metric; Canopy vertical profile; Forest structural parameter; LiDAR; Subtropical forest

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; OPTICAL RADAR; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; TROPICS; VEGETATION;

CANOPY HEIGHT DISTRIBUTIONS; CANOPY METRIC; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL PARAMETER; SUBTROPICAL FORESTS; VERTICAL PROFILE;

FORESTRY;

EID: 85029396305     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9090940     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Phillips, O.L.; Jackson, R.B. The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of theWorld's Forests. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44, 593-622.
2. Hill, S.; Lati, H.; Heurich, M.; Müller, J. Individual-tree-and stand-based development following natural disturbance in a heterogeneously structured forest: A LiDAR-based approach. Ecol. Inform. 2017, 38, 12-25.
3. Franklin, J.F.; Spies, T.A.; Pelt, R.V.; Carey, A.B.; Thornburgh, D.A.; Rae, D.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Harmon, M.E.; Keeton, W.S.; Shaw, D.C.; et al. Disturbances and structural development of nsatural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155, 399-423.
4. Palace, M.W.; Sullivan, F.B.; Ducey, M.J.; Treuhaft, R.N.; Herrick, C.; Shimbo, J.Z.; Mota-E-Silva, J. Estimating forest structure in a tropical forest using field measurements, a synthetic model and discrete return lidar data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 161, 1-11.
5. McElhinny, C.; Gibbons, P.; Brack, C.; Bauhus, J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 218, 1-24.
6. Spies, T.A. Forest Structure: A Key to the Ecosystem. Northwest Sci. 1998, 72, 34-39.
7. Zimble, D.A.; Evans, D.L.; Carlson, G.C.; Parker, R.C.; Grado, S.C.; Gerard, P.D. Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 87, 171-182.
8. Miura, N.; Jones, S.D. Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. J. 2010, 114, 1069-1076.
9. Pasher, J.; King, D.J. Multivariate forest structure modelling and mapping using high resolution airborne imagery and topographic information. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 1718-1732.
10. Corlett, R.T. Where are the Subtropics? Biotropica 2013, 45, 273-275.
11. Zhang, Y.J.; Cristiano, P.M.; Zhang, Y.F.; Campanello, P.I.; Tan, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.P.; Goldstein, G.; Cao, K.F. Carbon Economy of Subtropical Forests. Trop. Tree Physiol. 2016, 6, 337-355.
12. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808e.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2017).
13. Ouyang, S.; Xiang, W.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Y.; Lei, P.; Deng, X.; Peng, C. Significant effects of biodiversity on forest biomass during the succession of subtropical forest in south China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 372, 291-302.
14. Bouvier, M.; De, M.; Renaud, J. Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 156, 322-334.
15. White, J.C.; Coops, N.C.;Wulder, M.A.; Vastaranta, M.; Hilker, T.; Tompalski, P.; White, J.C.; Coops, N.C.; Wulder, M.A.; Vastaranta, M.; et al. Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2016, 42, 619-641.
16. Mcroberts, R.E.; Tomppo, E.O. Remote sensing support for national forest inventories. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 412-419.
17. Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Nelson, R.F.; Næsset, E.; Ørka, H.O.; Coops, N.C.; Hilker, T.; Bater, C.W.; Gobakken, T. Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 121, 196-209.
18. Wulder, M. Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 1998, 22, 449-476.
19. Duncanson, L.I.; Niemann, K.O.; Wulder, M.A. Integration of GLAS and Landsat TM data for aboveground biomass estimation. Carbon 2010, 36, 129-141.
20. Lu, D.; Chen, Q.; Wang, G.; Moran, E.; Batistella, M.; Zhang, M.; Laurin, G.V.; Saah, D. Aboveground Forest Biomass Estimation with Landsat and LiDAR Data and Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimates. Int. J. For. Res. 2012, 2012.
21. Rosenqvist, Å.; Milne, A.; Lucas, R.; Imhoff, M.; Dobson, C. A review of remote sensing technology in support of the Kyoto Protocol. Environ. Sci. Policy 2003, 6, 441-455.
22. Yu, Y.; Yang, X.; Fan, W. Estimates of forest structure parameters from GLAS data and multi-angle imaging spectrometer data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2015, 38, 65-71.
23. Li, W.; Niu, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, D.;Wu, M.; Zhao, W. Remote estimation of canopy height and aboveground biomass of maize using high-resolution stereo images from a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle system. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 637-648.
24. Véga, C.; Renaud, J.; Durrieu, S.; Bouvier, M. On the interest of penetration depth, canopy area and volume metrics to improve Lidar-based models of forest parameters. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 175, 32-42.
25. Means, J.E.; Acker, S.A.; Fitt, B.J.; Renslow, M.; Emerson, L.; Abstract, C.J.H. Predicting Forest Stand Characteristics with Airborne Scanning Lidar. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2000, 66, 1367-1371.
26. Silva, C.A.; Klauberg, C.; Hudak, A.T.; Vierling, L.A.; Liesenberg, V.; Carvalho, S.P.C.E.; Rodriguez, L.C.E. A principal component approach for predicting the stem volume in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil using airborne LiDAR data. Forestry 2016, 89, 422-433.
27. Tesfamichael, S.G.; Beech, C. Combining Akaike's Information Criterion and discrete return LiDAR data to estimate structural attributes of savanna woody vegetation. J. Arid Environ. 2016, 129, 25-34.
28. Sabol, J.; Procházka, D.; Patočka, Z. Development of models for forest variable estimation from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach at a plot level. J. For. Sci. 2016, 62, 137-142.
29. Frazer, G.W.; Magnussen, S.; Wulder, M.A.; Niemann, K.O. Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. J. 2011, 115, 636-649.
30. Montealegre, A.L.; Riva, J.D.; García-martín, A. Use of low point density ALS data to estimate stand-level structural variables in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forest. Forestry 2016, 1-10.
31. Zolkos, S.G.; Goetz, S.J.; Dubayah, R. A meta-analysis of terrestrial aboveground biomass estimation using lidar remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 128, 289-298.
32. Magnussen, S.; Næsset, E.; Gobakken, T. Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: A case study with Norway spruce. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 700-712.
33. Magnussen, S.; Næsset, E.; Gobakken, T. Prediction of tree-size distributions and inventory variables from cumulants of canopy height distributions. Forestry 2013, 86, 583-595.
34. MacArthur, R.; MacArthur, J.W. On bird species diversity. Ecology 1961, 42, 594-598.
35. Aber, J.D. A method for estimating foliage-height profiles in broad-leaved forests. Ecology 1979, 67, 35-40.
36. Lefsky, M.A.; Cohen, W.B.; Acker, S.A.; Parker, G.G. Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-FirWestern Hemlock Forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 361, 339-361.
37. Lovell, J.L.; Jupp, D.L.B.; Culvenor, D.S.; Coops, N.C.; Les, R. Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 29, 607-622.
38. Coops, N.C.; Hilker, T.; Wulder, M.A.; St-Onge, B.; Newnham, G.; Siggins, A.; Trofymow, J.A. Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR. Trees 2007, 21, 295-310.
39. Hilker, T.; Leeuwen, M.V.; Coops, N.C. Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand. Trees 2010, 24, 819-832.
40. Kraus, K.; Pfeifer, N. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 1998, 53, 193-203.
41. Song, Y.B.; Ding, Y.P. The development and latest progress of JSCORS. Bull. Surv. Mapp. 2009, 2, 73-74.
42. Jiang, B.; Yuan, W.; Zhu, G. A preliminary study on the plantation biomass and produce structure of Pinus massoniana, Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol. 1992, 12, 1-9.
43. Ye, J.; Yang, Z. Biomass structure of planted Chinese fir in Southern Jiangsu province, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1983, 3, 7-14.
44. Wang, Q.; Shi, Y. A preliminary study on the biomass and production of slash pine plantation in Jiangsu province. Acta Phytoecol. Geobot. Sin. 1990, 14, 2-12.
45. Xu, J.;Wang, M.; Huang, Q.; Gong, S. Study on aboveground biomass model of natural individual trees of Quercus acutissima. Anhui For. Sci. Technol. 2011, 37, 3-6.
46. Qian, G. Studies on the dynamic change of the net production quantity of liquidambar formosana plantation. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2000, 22, 399-404.
47. Sun, D.; Ruan, H.; Ye, J. Biomass Structure of Oak-Dominated Secondary Forest in Kongqingshan. Available online: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0034-4257(16)30106-7/rf0260 (accessed on 14 June 2017).
48. Zhao, K.; Popescu, S.; Nelson, R. Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 182-196.
49. Weishampel, J.F.; Drake, J.B.; Cooper, A.; Blair, J.B.; Hofton, M. Forest canopy recovery from the 1938 hurricane and subsequent salvage damage measured with airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 109, 142-153.
50. Bailey, R.; Dell, T. Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For. Sci. 1973, 19, 97-104.
51. Penner, M.;Woods, M.; Pitt, D.G. A comparison of airborne laser scanning and image point cloud derived tree size class distribution models in Boreal Ontario. Forests 2015, 6, 4034-4054.
52. Tompalski, P.; Coops, N.C.; White, J.C.;Wulder, M.A. Enriching ALS-derived area-based estimates of volume through tree-level downscaling. Forests 2015, 6, 2608-2630.
53. Zhao, J.; LI, J.; Liu, Q. Review of forest vertical structure parameter inversion based on remote sensing technology. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 17, 697.
54. Jupp, D.L.B.; Culvenor, D.S.; Lovell, J.L.; Newnham, G.J.; Strahler, A.H.;Woodcock, C.E. Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called 'Echidna®. Tree Physiol. 2008, 29, 171-181.
55. Hilker, T.; Coops, N.C.; Newnham, G.J.; Leeuwen, M.V.;Wulder, M.A.; Stewart, J.; Culvenor, D.S. Comparison of Terrestrial and Airborne LiDAR in Describing Stand Structure of a Thinned Lodgepole Pine Forest. J. For. 2012, 10, 97-104.
56. Sprugel, D. Correcting for Bias in Log-Transformed Allometric Equations. Ecology 1983, 64, 209-210.
57. Næsset, E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 80, 88-99.
58. Næsset, E.; Bollandsås, O.M.; Gobakken, T. Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 94, 541-553.
59. García-gutiérrez, J.; Martínez-Álvarez, F.; Troncoso, A.; Riquelme, J.C. A comparison of machine learning regression techniques for LiDAR-derived estimation of forest variables. Neurocomputing 2015, 167, 24-31.
60. Naesset, E.; Okland, T. Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 79, 105-115.
61. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716-723.
62. Kutner, M.; Nachtsheim, C.; Neter, J.; Li, W. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
63. Bengio, Y. No Unbiased Estimator of the Variance of K-Fold Cross-Validation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004, 5, 1089-1105.
64. Parker, G.G. Structure and Microclimate of Forest Canopies. In Forest Canopies; Lowman, M.D., Nadkarni, N.M., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1995; pp. 73-106.
65. Wilkes, P.; Suarez, L.; Andrew, H.; Andrew, M.; William, W.; Mariela, S.-B.; Skidmore, A.K. Using discrete-return ALS to quantify number of canopy strata across diverse forest types Using discrete-return airborne laser scanning to quantify number of canopy strata across diverse forest types. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 1-13.
66. Lefsky, M.A.; Harding, D.; Cohen, W.B.; Parker, G.; Shugart, H.H. Surface Lidar Remote Sensing of Basal Area and Biomass in Deciduous Forests of Eastern Maryland, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 67, 83-98.
67. Leiterer, R.; Torabzadeh, H.; Furrer, R.; Schaepman, M.E.; Morsdorf, F. Towards Automated Characterization of Canopy Layering in Mixed Temperate Forests Using Airborne Laser Scanning. Forests 2015, 6, 4146-4167.
68. Van Leeuwen, M.; Nieuwenhuis, M. Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. Eur. J. For. Res. 2010, 129, 749-770.
69. Ishii, H. The role of crown architecture, leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests. Ecol. Res. 2010, 25, 715-722.
70. He, J.; Zhu, S. The Preliminary Study on the Law of the Crown Structure of Massons Pine in Mid-Subtropical Region. J. Mt. Agric. Biol. 1990, 9, 61-72.
71. Liang, X.; Ye, W. Advances in Study of Forest Gaps. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2001, 9, 355-364.
72. Kneeshaw, D.D.; Bergeron, Y. Canopy Gap Characteristics and Tree Replacement in the Southeastern Boreal Forest. Ecology 1998, 79, 783-794.
73. An, S.; Zhao, R. Analysis of Characteristics of Secondary Forest Vegetation in the North Subtropical Zone of China. J. Nanjing Univ. Sci. 1991, 27, 324-331.
74. Spies, T.A.; Frankli, J.F. Gap Characteristics and Vegetation Response in Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 1989, 70, 543-545.
75. Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, X. Forest canopy structure, light environment and their effects on the vegetation pattern and growth of understory in forests. J. Sci. Teach. Univ. 2015, 35, 57-62.
76. Montgomery, R.A.; Chazdon, R.L. Forest structure, canopy architectura, and light transmittance in old-growth and second-growth tropical rain forests. Ecology 2001, 82, 2707-2718.
77. Zhu, S.; He, J. The Preliminary Study on the Law of the Crown Structure of Masson's pine in South-subtropcial. J. Mt. Agric. Biol. 1993, 12, 36-44.
78. Messier, C.; Sylvain, P.; Bergeron, Y. Effects of Overstory and Understory Vegetation on the Understory Light Environment in Mixed Boreal Forests. J. Veg. Sci. 1998, 9, 511-520.
79. Parent, S.; Messier, C. A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy. Can. J. For. Res. 1996, 26, 151-154.
80. Zhao, F.; Yang, X.; Schull, M.A.; Román-colón, M.O.; Yao, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Jupp, D.L.B.; Lovell, J.L.; Culvenor, D.S.; et al. Measuring effective leaf area index, foliage profile, and stand height in New England forest stands using a full-waveform ground-based lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 2954-2964.
81. Tang, H.; Dubayah, R.; Brolly, M.; Ganguly, S.; Zhang, G. Large-scale retrieval of leaf area index and vertical foliage profile from the spaceborne waveform lidar (GLAS/ICESat). Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 154, 8-18.
82. Fu, T.; Pang, Y.; Huang, Q.F.; Liu, Q.W.; Xu, G.C. Prediction of Subtropical Forest Parameters Using Airborne Laser Scanner. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 15, 1092-1104.
83. Xu, Z.; Cao, L.; Ruan, H.; Li, W.; Jiang, S. Inversion of subtropical forest stand characteristics by integrating very high resolution imagery acquired from UAV and LiDAR point-cloud. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2015, 39, 849-856.
84. Wilkes, P.; Jones, S.; Suarez, L.; Haywood, A.; Mellora, A.; Soto-Berelov, M.;Woodgate, W. MAUP and LiDAR derived canopy structure. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 2013, 173-175.
85. Maltamo, M.; Bollandsås, O.M.; Næsset, E.; Gobakken, T.; Packalén, P. Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest inventory. Forestry 2011, 84, 23-31.
86. Van der Zande, D.; Stuckens, J.; Verstraeten, W.W.; Mereu, S.; Muys, B.; Coppin, P. 3D modeling of light interception in heterogeneous forest canopies using ground-based LiDAR data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2011, 13, 792-800.
87. Stoker, J. Volumetric Visualization of multiple-return Lidar Data: Using Voxels. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2009, 75, 109-112.
88. Zheng, G.; Moskal, L.M. Computational-Geometry-Based Retrieval of Computational-Geometry-Based Retrieval of Effective Leaf Area Index Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Soc. 2015, 50, 3958-3969.
89. Grau, E.; Durrieu, S.; Fournier, R.; Gastellu-etchegorry, J.; Yin, T. Estimation of 3D vegetation density with Terrestrial Laser Scanning data using voxels. A sensitivity analysis of influencing parameters. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 191, 373-388.
90. Li, J.; Hu, B.; Noland, T.L. Classification of tree species based on structural features derived from high density LiDAR data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 171-172, 104-114.
91. Kükenbrink, D.; Schneider, F.D.; Leiterer, R.; Schaepman, M.E.; Morsdorf, F. Quantification of hidden canopy volume of airborne laser scanning data using a voxel traversal algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 194, 424-436.
92. Oshio, H.; Asawa, T.; Hoyano, A.; Miyasaka, S. Estimation of the leaf area density distribution of individual trees using high-resolution and multi-return airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 166, 116-125.
93. Béland, M.;Widlowski, J.; Fournier, R.A. A model for deriving voxel-level tree leaf area density estimates from ground-based LiDAR. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 51, 184-189.