Getting foxy: Invoking different magesteria in the scholarship of teaching and learning

Teaching and Learning Inquiry

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 109-114

  Gurung, Reagan A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

Author keywords

Humanities; Pedagogy; Research methods; Social sciences; SoTL

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029360764     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21674787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.2.109     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beummwtt, B. (2010). Techniques of close reading. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
2. Chick, N. (2013). Difference, privilege, and power in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The value of humanities SoTL. In K. McKinney (Ed.) The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 152-168). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
3. Chick, N., Haynie, A., & Gurung, R. A. R. (Eds.) (2012). Exploring more signature pedagogies. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J . W., & Piano Clark, V. L. (2012). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1, 121-126.
8. Gelman, A., & Cortina, J. (Eds.) (2009). A quantitative tour of the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Gould, S. J . (2003). The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister's pox: Mending the gap between the sciences and the humanities. New York: Three Rivers Press.
10. Grauerholz, L. & Main, E. (2013). Fallacies of SoTL: Rethinking how we conduct our research. In K. McKinney (Ed.) The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 152-168). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
11. Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N., & Haynie, A. (Eds.) (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
12. Gurung, R. A. R., & Schwartz, B. (2009). Optimizing teaching and learning: Pedagogical Research in Practice. Wiley Blackwell Publishing. London.
13. Jarvis, P., & Creasey, G. (October, 2009). Strengthening SoTL Research: The Voices of Editors. Presented at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learn¬ ing, Bloomington, IN.
14. Maurer, T. (2011). On publishing SoTL articles. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/
15. Poole, G. (2013). Square one: What is research? In K. McKinney (Ed.) The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 152-168). Bloomington, IN: Indiana Uni¬ versity Press.
16. Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. (2011). The relationship between scholarly teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5. Retrieved from www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl
17. Rubin, H. J ., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3 ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
18. Schwartz, E., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2012). Evidence-based teaching in higher education. Washing¬ ton, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Voelker, D., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL): A discus¬ sion. Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/opid/
20. White, C. (2013). The science delusion: Asking the big questions in a culture of easy answers. New York: Melville House.
21. Wilson-Doenges, G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2013). Benchmarks for scholarly investigations of teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 63-70. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12011
22. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The utility of knowledge. New York: Vintage Press.