Decision-making based on network visualization applied to building life cycle optimization

Sustainable Cities and Society

Volumn 35, Issue , 2017, Pages 565-573

  Gilles, Fraisse ^a   Bernard, Souyri ^a   Ioannis, Axaopoulos ^a   Simon, Rouchier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

Author keywords

Computational time; Decision making; Multi objective optimization; Satisfaction function; Surrogate model

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DECISION MAKING; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INTERPOLATION; LIFE CYCLE; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; VISUALIZATION;

BUILDING LIFE CYCLE; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; GLOBAL OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; NETWORK VISUALIZATION; PERFORMANCE CRITERION; SATISFACTION FUNCTIONS; SURROGATE MODEL; ZERO ENERGY BUILDING (ZEB);

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 85029167495     PISSN: 22106707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Antipova, E., Boer, D., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Cabeza, L.F., Jiménez, L., Multi-objective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment for retrofitting buildings. Energy and Building 82 (2014), 92–99.
2. Ascione, F., Bianco, N., De Stasio, C., Mauro, G.M., Vanoli, G.P., Artificial neural networks to predict energy performance and retrofit scenarios for any member of a building category: A novel approach. Energy 118 (2017), 999–1017.
3. Attia, S., Hamdy, M., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design. Energy and Buildings 60 (2013), 110–124.
4. Ayaz, E., Yang, F., Zero carbon isn't really zero: why embodied carbon in materials can't be ignored. Design Intelligence, 2009 Retrieved from http://www.di.net/articles/archive/zero.
5. Beccali, M., Cellura, M., Lo Brano, V., Marvuglia, A., Forecasting daily urban electric load profiles using artificial neural networks. Energy Conversion and Management 45 (2004), 2879–2900.
6. Belcher, S.E., Hacker, J.N., Powell, D.S., Constructing design weather data for future climates. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 26:1 (2005), 49–61.
7. Blengini, G.A., Di Carlo, T., The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings 42:6 (2010), 869–880.
8. Bornatico, R., Hüssy, J., Witzig, A., Guzzella, L., Surrogate modeling for the fast optimization of energy systems. Energy 57 (2013), 653–662.
9. Boyd, S.P., Vandenberghe, L., Convex optimization. 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Cao, S., Hasan, A., Sirén, K., Analysis and solution for renewable energy load matching for a single-family house. Energy and Buildings 65 (2013), 398–411.
11. Carreras, J., Boer, D., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Cabeza, L.F., Medrano, M., Jiménez, L., Multi-objective optimization of thermal modelled cubicles considering the total cost and life cycle environmental impact. Energy and Buildings 88 (2014), 335–346.
12. Carreras, J., Pozo, C., Boer, D., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Caballero, J.A., Ruiz-Femenia, R., et al. Systematic approach for the life cycle multi-objective optimization of buildings combining objective reduction and surrogate modeling. Energy and Buildings 130 (2016), 506–518.
13. Catalina, T., Virgone, J., Blanco, E., Multi-source energy systems analysis using A multi-criteria decision aid methodology. Renewable Energy 36:8 (2011), 2245–2252.
14. Chastas, P., Theodosiou, T., Dimitrios bikas embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review. Review Article Building and Environment 105:15 (2016), 267–282.
15. Chen, Y., Ng, S.T., Factoring in embodied GHG emissions when assessing the environmental performance of building. Sustainable Cities and Society 27 (2016), 244–252.
16. Cheng, M.Y., Cao, M.T., Accurately predicting building energy performance using evolutionary multivariate adaptive regression splines. Applied Soft Computing 22 (2014), 178–188.
17. Cherif, M.S., Chabchoub, H., Aouni, B., Quality control system design through the goal programming model and the satisfaction functions. European Journal of Operational Research 186:3 (2008), 1084–1098.
18. Comodi, G., Giantomassi, A., Severini, M., Squartini, S., Ferracuti, F., Fonti, A., et al. Multi-apartment residential microgrid with electrical and thermal storage devices: experimental analysis and simulation of energy management strategies. Appl. Energy 137 (2014), 854–866.
19. Eguía, P., Granada, E., Alonso, J.M., Arce, E., Saavedra, A., Weather datasets generated using kriging techniques to calibrate building thermal simulations with TRNSYS. Journal of Building Engineering 7 (2016), 78–91.
20. Eisenhower, B., O'Neill, Z., Narayanan, S., Fonoberov, V.A., Mezić, I., A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energy and Buildings 47 (2012), 292–301.
21. Evins, R., A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013), 230–245.
22. Fieldson, R., Rai, D., Sodagar, B., Towards a framework for early estimation of lifecycle carbon footprint of buildings in the UK. Construction Information Quarterly 11:2 (2009), 66–75 ISSN 1469-4891.
23. Friedman, J.H., Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Statistics, 1991, 1–67.
24. Giordano, R., Serra, V., Tortalla, E., Valentini, V., Aghemo, C., Embodied energy and operational energy assessment in the framework of nearly zero energy building and building energy rating. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 3204–3209.
25. Giordano, R., Serra, V., Demaria, E., Duzel, A., Embodied energy versus operational energy in a nearly zero energy building case study. Energy Procedia 111 (2017), 367–376.
26. Hopfe, C.J., Emmerich, M.T., Marijt, R., Hensen, J.L.M., Robust multi-criteria design optimisation in building design. Proceedings of the building simulation and optimization conference, Loughborough, UK, 2012.
27. IEA, Promoting Energy efficiency investments. Case studies in the residential sector. 2008 https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/PromotingEE2008.pdf.
28. Ibn-Mohammed, T., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa-Meida, L., Acquaye, A., Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends. Energy and Buildings 66 (2013), 232–245.
29. Iwaro, J., Mwasha, A., Williams, R.G., Zico, R., An Integrated Criteria Weighting Framework for the sustainable performance assessment and design of building envelope. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014), 417–434.
30. Jin, Q., Favoino, F., Overend, M., Design and control optimisation of adaptive insulation systems for office buildings. Part 2: A parametric study for a temperate climate. Energy 127:May(15) (2017), 634–649.
31. Kalkan, N., Young, E.A., Celiktas, A., Solar thermal air conditioning technology reducing the footprint of solar thermal air conditioning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (2012), 6352–6383.
32. Kanarachos, A., Geramanis, K., Multivariable control of single zone hydronic heating systems with neural networks. Energy Conversion and Management 39 (1998), 1317–1336.
33. Karimpour, M., Belusko, M., Xing, K., Bruno, F., et al. Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: review and analysis. Building and Environment 73 (2014), 106–114.
34. Kleijnen, J.P., Regression and kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: a review. European Journal of Operational Research 256:1 (2017), 1–16.
35. Kontu, K., Rinne, S., Olkkonen, V., Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., Multicriteria evaluation of heating choices for a new sustainable residential area. Energy and Buildings 93 (2015), 169–179.
36. Kusiak, A., Li, M., Tang, F., Modeling and optimization of HVAC energy consumption. Applied Energy 87:10 (2010), 3092–3102.
37. Machairas, V., Tsangrassoulis, A., Axarli, K., Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31 (2014), 101–112.
38. Magnier, L., Haghighat, F., Multiobjective optimization of building design using TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network. Building and Environment 45:3 (2010), 739–746.
39. Marszal, A.J., Heiselberg, P., Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential net zero energy building in Denmark. Energy 36 (2011), 5600–5609.
40. Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V., Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability Original Research Article. Omega 59:March (2016), 146–156 Part B.
41. Nguyen, A.T., Reiter, S., Rigo, P., A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy 113 (2014), 1043–1058.
42. Penna, P., Prada, A., Cappelletti, F., Gasparella, A., Multi-objectives optimization of Energy Efficiency Measures in existing buildings. Energy and Buildings 95 (2015), 57–69.
43. Ramallo-González, A.P., Coley, D.A., Using self-adaptive optimisation methods to perform sequential optimisation for low-energy building design. Energy and Buildings 81 (2014), 18–29.
44. Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., Shukla, K.K., Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy and Buildings 42:10 (2010), 1592–1600.
45. Roberti, F., Oberegger, U.F., Lucchi, E., Troi, A., Energy retrofit and conservation of a historic building using multi-objective optimization and an analytic hierarchy process. Energy and Buildings 138:1 (2017), 1–10.
46. Roux, C., Schalbart, P., Assoumou, E., Peuportier, B., Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts. Applied Energy 184 (2016), 619–629.
47. Si, J., Marjanovic-Halburd, L., Nasiri, F., Bel, S., Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: a review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Sustainable Cities and Society 27 (2016), 106–115.
48. Song, X., Ye, C., Climate change adaptation pathways for residential buildings in southern China. Energy Procedia 105 (2017), 3062–3067.
49. Terzidis, K., Algorithmic architecture. 2006, New York, Routledge.
50. Tresidder, E., Zhang, Y., Forrester, A.I., Acceleration of building design optimisation through the use of kriging surrogate models. Proceedings of the building simulation and optimization conference, September, 2016, 2012.
51. Van Gelder, L., Das, P., Janssen, H., Roels, S., Comparative study of metamodelling techniques in building energy simulation: guidelines for practitioners. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 49 (2014), 245–257.
52. Volvačiovas, R., Turskis, Z., Aviža, D., Mikštienė, R., Multi-attribute selection of public buildings retrofits strategy. Procedia Engineering 57 (2013), 1236–1241.
53. Wang, E., Alp, N., Shi, J., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Chen, H., Multi-criteria building energy performance benchmarking through variable clustering based compromise TOPSIS with objective entropy weighting. Energy 125:April(15) (2017), 197–210.
54. Wetter, M., Polak, E., A convergent optimization method using pattern search algorithms with adaptive precision simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 25:4 (2004), 327–338.
55. Wu, R., Mavromatidis, G., Orehounig, K., Carmeliet, J., Multiobjective optimisation of energy systems and building envelope retrofit in a residential community. Applied Energy 190 (2017), 634–649.
56. Zavala, V.M., Constantinescu, E.M., Krause, T., Anitescu, M., Weather forecast-based optimization of integrated energy systems., 2009, Argonne National Laboratory Technical report.