Multicriteria evaluation of heating choices for a new sustainable residential area

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 93, Issue , 2015, Pages 169-179

  Kontu, Kaisa ^a   Rinne, Samuli ^a   Olkkonen, Ville ^a   Lahdelma, Risto ^a   Salminen, Pekka ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Buildings; Energy efficiency; Heating systems; Multicriteria decision support; SMAA; Sustainable energy planning

Indexed keywords

APARTMENT HOUSES; BUILDINGS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; HEATING EQUIPMENT; HOUSING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

HEATING SYSTEM; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; MULTICRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; SMAA; STOCHASTIC MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSES (SMAA); SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS;

HEATING;

EID: 84925858563     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Statistics Finland, Statistics Finland 2012, http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/rakke/tau-en.html (2013). (Accessed 22.10.13).
2. Energiateollisuus ry, Statistics and publications, http://energia.fi/en/statistics-and-publications (2013).
3. PRKK Pientalorakentamisen kehittämiskeskus 2014 https://www.prkk.fi/
4. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future 1987 Oxford University Press Oxford
5. J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, C.-F. Zhang, and J.-H. Zhao Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 2009 2263 2278 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
6. B. Vučićević, M. Jovanović, N. Afgan, and V. Turanjanin Assessing the sustainability of the energy use of residential buildings in Belgrade through multi-criteria analysis Energy Build. 69 2014 51 61 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.10.022
7. M. Jovanovic, N. Afgan, and V. Bakic An analytical method for the measurement of energy system sustainability in urban areas Energy 35 2010 3909 3920 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.010
8. F. Ribeiro, P. Ferreira, and M. Araújo Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: the Portuguese case Energy 52 2013 126 136 10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.036
9. S. Matteson, Methods for multi-criteria sustainability and reliability assessments of power systems, Energy 71, 2014, 130-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.042.
10. M. Burer, K. Tanaka, D. Favrat, and K. Yamada Multi-criteria optimization of a district cogeneration plant integrating a solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine combined cycle, heat pumps and chillers Energy 28 2003 497 518 10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00161-5
11. A. Maxim Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis Energy Policy 65 2014 284 297 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.059
12. T. Tsoutsos, M. Drandaki, N. Frantzeskaki, E. Iosifidis, and I. Kiosses Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete Energy Policy 37 2009 1587 1600 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.011
13. J.A. Cherni, I. Dyner, F. Henao, P. Jaramillo, R. Smith, and R.O. Font Energy supply for sustainable rural livelihoods. A multi-criteria decision-support system Energy Policy 35 2007 1493 1504 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.026
14. E. Santoyo-Castelazo, A. Azapagic, Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects, J. Clean. Prod 80, 2014, 119-138,. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061.
15. M.M. Rahman, J.V. Paatero, and R. Lahdelma Evaluation of choices for sustainable rural electrification in developing countries: a multicriteria approach Energy Policy 59 2013 589 599 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.017
16. E.W. Stein A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 22 2013 640 654 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.001
17. S. Ghafghazi, T. Sowlati, S. Sokhansanj, and S. Melin A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options Appl. Energy 87 2010 1134 1140 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.021
18. M. Grujić, D. Ivezić, and M. Živković Application of multi-criteria decision-making model for choice of the optimal solution for meeting heat demand in the centralized supply system in Belgrade Energy 67 2014 341 350 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.017
19. H. Li, M. Burer, Z.-P. Song, D. Favrat, and F. Marechal Green heating system: characteristics and illustration with multi-criteria optimization of an integrated energy system Energy 29 2004 225 244 10.1016/j.energy.2003.09.003
20. F. Cavallaro Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies Renew. Energy 34 2009 1678 1685 10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.034
21. R. Mamlook, B.A. Akash, and S. Nijmeh Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan Energy Convers. Manage. 42 2001 1717 1726 10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00152-7
22. T. Buchholz, E. Rametsteiner, T.A. Volk, and V.A. Luzadis Multi criteria analysis for bioenergy systems assessments Energy Policy 37 2009 484 495 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.054
23. F.E. Boran, T. Menlik, and K. Boran Multi-criteria axiomatic design approach to evaluate sites for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: a case study in Turkey Energy Sources Part B: Econ. Plan. Policy 5 2010 290 300 10.1080/15567240802533831
24. M. Dombi, I. Kuti, and P. Balogh Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies Energy Policy 67 2014 264 271 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.032
25. S.D. Pohekar, and M. Ramachandran Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - a review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 8 2004 365 381 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
26. G. Liu Development of a general sustainability indicator for renewable energy systems: a review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 31 2014 611 621 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.038
27. D. Gallego Carrera, and A. Mack Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: results of a survey among European energy experts Energy Policy 38 2010 1030 1039 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.055
28. A. Colantonio, Social Sustainability Linking Research to Policy and Practice, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD), http://ec.europa.eu/research/sd/conference/2009/papers/7/andrea-colantonio-social-sustainability.pdf.
29. T. Catalina, J. Virgone, and E. Blanco Multi-source energy systems analysis using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology Renew. Energy 36 2011 2245 2252 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.011
30. K. Alanne, A. Salo, A. Saari, and S.-I. Gustafsson Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems Energy Build. 39 2007 1218 1226 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.01.009
31. B. Vučićević, M. Stojiljković, N. Afgan, V. Turanjanin, M. Jovanović, and V. Bakić Sustainability assessment of residential buildings by non-linear normalization procedure Energy Build. 58 2013 348 354 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.012
32. D. Chinese, G. Nardin, and O. Saro Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of space heating systems in an industrial building Energy 36 2011 556 565 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.005
33. R. Lahdelma, J. Hokkanen, and P. Salminen SMAA - stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106 1998 137 143 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X
34. A. Pesola, A. Serkkola, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Multicriteria evaluation of alternatives for remote monitoring systems of municipal buildings Energy Build. 72 2014 229 237 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.10.037
35. J. Hokkanen, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki J. Environ. Manage. 60 2000 339 348 10.1006/jema.2000.0389
36. R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen, and J. Hokkanen Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142 2002 345 356 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00303-4
37. J. Hokkanen, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen A multiple criteria decision model for analyzing and choosing among different development patterns for the Helsinki cargo harbor Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 33 1999 1 23 10.1016/S0038-0121(98)00007-X
38. A.S. Kangas, J. Kangas, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Using SMAA-2 method with dependent uncertainties for strategic forest planning For. Policy Econ. 9 2006 113 125 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.012
39. J. Kangas, R. Store, and A. Kangas Socioecological landscape planning approach and multicriteria acceptability analysis in multiple-purpose forest management For. Policy Econ. 7 2005 603 614 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.001
40. A. Menou, A. Benallou, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Decision support for centralizing cargo at a Moroccan airport hub using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204 2010 621 629 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.11.021
41. Porvoon Energia, www.porvoonenergia.fi (2014).
42. Motiva Heating systems for one-family houses Pientalon lämmitysjärjestelmät 2012 (in Finnish)
43. Motiva. (2014). http://www.motiva.fi/en (accessed June 16, 2014).
44. Sähkön hintavertailu. http://www.sahkonhinta.fi/summariesandgraphs (accessed November 30, 2014).
45. Porvoon Energia. Prices for district heating. http://www.porvoonenergia.fi/fi/hinnastot/kaukolampohinnastoporvoo (accessed November 30, 2014).
46. Tilastokeskus, Prices and costs 2014 (in Finnish: Hinnat ja kustannukset 2014), http://statfitilthi201402thi2014022014-03-24tau025fihtml (2014).
47. Metsäkeskus, Wood energy price, http://Www.halkoliiteri.com (2014).
48. M.A. Curran, M. Mann, and G. Norris The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories J. Clean. Prod. 13 2005 853 862 10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001
49. T. Ekvall, A.-M. Tillman, and S. Molander Normative ethics and methodology for life cycle assessment J. Clean. Prod. 13 2005 1225 1234 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.010
50. G. Finnveden, M.Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, and S. Hellweg Recent developments in life cycle assessment J. Environ. Manage. 91 2009 1 21 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
51. MEE National Energy and Climate Strategy, Background Report 2013 Ministry of Employment and the Economy http://www.tem.fi/ (In Finnish)
52. B.V. Mathiesen, M. Münster, and T. Fruergaard Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments J. Clean. Prod. 17 2009 1331 1338 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009
53. H. Lund, B.V. Mathiesen, P. Christensen, and J.H. Schmidt Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15 2010 260 271
54. H.S. Eggleston Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Chikyu Kankyo Senryaku Kenkyu Kikan, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2006
55. Energistyrelsen, Technology Data for Energy Plants: Generation of Electricity and District Heating, Energy Storage and Energy Carrier Generation and Conversion. http://www.ens.dk/ (2012).
56. Energistyrelsen, Technology Data for Energy Plants: Individual Heating Plants and Technology Transport. Danish Energy Agency, 2012., http://www.ens.dk/ (2012).
57. R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen SMAA-2. Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for group decision making Oper. Res. 49 2001 444 454
58. T. Tervonen, and J.R. Figueira A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 15 2008 500 513
59. R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) M. Ehrgott, J.R. Figueira Greco, Trends Mult Criteria Decis. Anal. 2010 Springer
60. T. Tervonen, and R. Lahdelma Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178 2007 500 513 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.037
61. R. Lahdelma, K. Miettinen, and P. Salminen Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147 2003 117 127 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00267-9
62. R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen Pseudo-criteria versus linear utility function in stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141 2002 454 469 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00276-4
63. T. Tervonen, J.R. Figueira, R. Lahdelma, J.A. Dias, and P. Salminen A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192 2009 236 242 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.008
64. S. Corrente, J.R. Figueira, S. Greco, The SMAA-PROMETHEE method, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239, 2014, 514-522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.026.
65. I. Durbach, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen The analytic hierarchy process with stochastic judgements Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238 2014 552 559 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.045
66. R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen The shape of the utility or value function in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis Oper. Res. Spectr. 34 2012 785 802 10.1007/s00291-011-0244-5
67. R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England/New York, NY, USA