Referencing as cooperation or competition

Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 49-71

  Small, Henry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029077374     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110308464-006     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Allen, B., Qin, J., & Lancaster, F.W. (1994). Persuasive communities: a longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665-1990. Social Studies of Science, 24, 279-310.
2. Arrow, H. (2007). The sharp end of altruism. Science, 318 (Oct. 26), 581-582.
3. Barnes, B. (1974). Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Ben-David, J. (1984). The scientist’s role in society: a comparative study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2003). Evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65(1), 17-28.
6. Chatterjee, K. & Chowdhury, A. (2012). Formation of citation networks by rational players and the diffusion of ideas. Review of Network Economics, 11(3), article number 6.
7. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: between nature and society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
8. Collins, H. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now?. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
9. Cozzens, S. E. (1982). Split citation identity: a case study from economics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 233-236.
10. Cozzens, S. E. (1989). Social control and multiple discovery in science: the opiate receptor case. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
11. Crombie, A. C. (1959). The significance of medieval discussions of scientific method for the scientific revolution. In M. Clagett (Ed.), Critical problems in the history of science. (pp. 79-101). Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citation in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
13. Cronin, B. (1998). Metatheorizing citation. Scientometrics. 43(1), 45-55.
14. Cronin, B. (2000). Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 440-453.
15. Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. 30th anniversary edition.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891-921. Reprinted in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, volume 2. Translated by Anna Beck, consultant Peter Havas, pp. 140-171. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Fehr, E., Fischbacker, U., & Gachter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature and Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspectives, 13(1), 1-25.
18. Frankfort, H. & Frankfort, H. A. (1949). Myth and reality. In H. Frankfort, H. A. Frankfort, J. A. Wilson, & T. Jacobsen (Eds.), Before philosophy: the intellectual adventure of ancient man. (pp. 11-36). Baltimore, Maryland: Penguin Books.
19. Gaulton, G. N. (2004). Ethical conduct in biomedical research: a handbook for biomedical graduate studies students and research fellows, 3rd edition. Biomedical graduate studies program, the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved July 9, 2014, from https://www.med. upenn.edu/bgs/docs/BIOETHICSHANDBOOK4-04.pdf
20. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122.
21. Gingras, Y. & Schweber, S. S. (1986). Constraints on construction. Social Studies of Science, 16(2), 372-383.
22. Gower, B. (1997). Scientific method: an historical and philosophical introduction. London: Routledge.
23. Hagstrom, W.O. (1974). Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 1-18.
24. Hanson, N. R. (1972). Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Holton, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
26. Hull, D. (1988). Science as a process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.
28. Kamat, P. & Schatz, G. C. (2014). Cite with sight. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 5(7), 1241-1242.
29. Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 10(3), 179-184.
30. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
31. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment and theory choice. In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
34. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
35. Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 39, 225-248.
36. Leplin, J. (1984). Introduction. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism. (pp. 1-7). Berkeley, California:University of California Press.
37. Luukkonen, T. (1997). Why has Latour’s theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38(1), 27-37.
38. Merton, R. K. (1938). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. Bruges, Belgium: Saint Catherine Press.
39. Merton, R. K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126. Reprinted in: The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, 267-278.
40. Merton, R. K. (1963). Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science. European Journal of Sociology, 4, 250-282.
41. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
42. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science. 2. cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, 606-623.
43. Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
44. Mulkay, M. (1980). Interpretation and the use of rules: the case of the norms of science. In T. Gieryn (Ed.), Science and social structure: a festschrift for Robert K. Merton. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. Series 2, 39, 111-125.
45. Mulkay, M. (1991). Sociology of science: a sociological pilgrimage. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
46. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: an introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641.
48. Peters, H. P. F., Braam, R. R. & van Raan, A. F. J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 9-21. Retraction Watch: Lack of citation prompts correction in Nature journal. April 10, 2014. Retrieved July 9, 2014, from http://retractionwatch.com/2014/04/10/lack-of-citationprompts- correction-in-nature-journal/#more-19753
49. Riviera, E. (2013). Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: the reproductive function of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1442-1453.
50. Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
51. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
52. Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt, (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, 3 (pp. 287-310). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.
53. Small, H. (2004). On the shoulders of Robert Merton: towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, 60(1), 71-79.
54. Small, H. (2010). Referencing through history: how the analysis of landmark scholarly texts can inform citation theory. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 185-193.
55. Small, H. & Klavans, R. (2011). Identifying scientific breakthroughs by combining co-citation analysis and citation context. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Durban, South Africa.
56. Small, H., Boyack, K.W. & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43, 1450-1467.
57. Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
58. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
59. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
60. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
61. Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 26-47.
62. Thorpe, K.L, Benstead, R., Hutchinson, T. H., & Tyler, C. R. (2007). Associations between altered vitellogenin concentrations and adverse health effects in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquatic Toxicology, 85, 176-183.
63. Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737-738.
64. Whewell, W. (1847). Philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history. Vol. I. London: John W. Parker.
65. White, H. (2004). Reward, persuasion and the Sokal hoax. Scientometrics, 60(1), 93-120.
66. White, H. (2011). Relevance theory and citations. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3345-3361.
67. Wilson, D. S. & O’Gorman, R. (2003). Emotions and actions associated with norm-breaking events. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 14(3), 277-304.
68. Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
69. Wilson, E.O. (2014). The meaning of human existence. New York: Liveright Publishing Corp.
70. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205-214.
71. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Deviant behavior and social control in science. In E. Sagarin (Ed.), Deviance and social change. (pp. 87-138). Beverley Hills, California: Sage Publications.