Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 440-453

  Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034345059     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007123     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Sebeok, T.A. The study of signs. In: Sebeok, T.A. Signs: an introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, 3-10.
2. Cronin, B. The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 1981, 16-24.
3. Wouters, P. The citation culture. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, PhD thesis, 1999.
4. Leydesdorff, L. Comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 1998, 5-25.
5. Ben-Ari, E. On acknowledgements in ethnographies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 43(1), 1987, 63-64.
6. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. Narrative approach to organization studies. London: Sage, 1998.
7. Cronin, B. The scholar's courtesy: the role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham, 1995.
8. Cronin, B., Snyder, H.W., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A. and Callahan, E. Invoked on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1998, 1319-1328.
9. Cronin, B. The Warholian moment and other proto-indicators of scholarly salience. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 1999, 953-955.
10. Wouters, P. Writing histories of scientometrics or what precisely is scientometrics? 1993. (Available from the author)
11. McCain, K.W. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 1991, 491-516.
12. Edge, D. Why I am not a co-citationist. Society for the Social Studies of Science Newsletter, 2, 1977, 13-19.
13. White, H.D. Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In: Borgman, C.L., ed. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, 84-106.
14. Price, D.J. de Solla. Little science, big science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1963.
15. Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.
16. Garfield, E. I had a dream ... about uncitedness. The Scientist, 12(14), 1998, 10.
17. Gluck, M. Making sense of semiotics: privileging respondents in revealing contextual geographic syntactic and semantic codes. In: Vakkari, P., Savolainen, R. and Dervin, B., eds. Information seeking in context. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking, and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August, 1996, Tampere, Finland. London: Taylor Graham, 1997, 53-66.
18. Cunningham, D.J. Cognition as semiosis: the role of inference. Indiana University at Bloomington, 1999. http://php.indiana.edu/~cunningh/theory. html (visited 14 February 2000).
19. Cronin, B. and Weaver-Wozniak, S. Online access to acknowledgements. In: Williams, M.E., ed. 14th National Online Meetings: Proceedings - 1993, New York, May 4-6. Medford, NJ: Learned Information Inc., 1993, 93-98.
20. Cronin, B. Tiered citation and measures of document similarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(7), 1994, 537-538.
21. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16(1), 1986, 151-172.
22. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 1989, 342-349.
23. Grafton, A. The footnote: a curious history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
24. Merton, R.K. The sociology of science: an episodic memoir. In: Merton, R.K. and Gaston, J., eds. The sociology of science in Europe. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977, 3-141.
25. Fuller, S. Personal communication, 1996.
26. Brodkey, L. Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.
27. Bourdieu, P. Language & symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
28. Sosteric, M. Endowing mediocrity: neoliberalism, information technology, and the decline of radical pedagogy. Radical Pedagogy, 1999, 1(1). http:// www.sociology.org/RadicalPedagogy/content/vol1.1999/issue1/sosteric.html (visited 14 February 2000).
29. Warner, J. Semiotics, information science, documents and computers. Journal of Documentation, 46(1), 1990, 16-32.
30. Gilbert, G.N. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 1977, 113-122.
31. Small, H. Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 1978, 327-340.
32. Small H. Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 1980, 183-196.
33. Van Raan, A.F.J. In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much. Scientometrics, 43(1), 1998, 129-139.
34. Hicks, D. and Potter, J. Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science, 21(3), 1991, 459-501.
35. Baudrillard, J. For a critique of the political economy of the sign. London: Telos Press, 1981.
36. Fish, S. Doing what comes naturally: change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989.
37. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G. and Van Raan, A.F.J. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 1985, 131-149.
38. Webster, F. Theories of the information society. London: Routledge, 1995.
39. Collini, S. Publish - and be dimmed. The Times Higher Education Supplement, March 2, 1989, 13-14.
40. Healey, P., Irvine, J. and Martin, B.R. Introduction: quantitative science-policy studies in the United Kingdom. Scientometrics, 14(3-4), 1988, 177-183.
41. Halsey, A.H. Decline of donnish dominion: the British academic professions in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
42. Williams, N. UK universities: jostling for rank. Science, 275, 3 January, 1997, 18-19.
43. Hodges, S., Hodges, B., Meadows, J., Hancock-Beaulieu, M. and Law, D. The use of an algorithmic approach for the assessment of research quality. Scientometrics, 35(1), 1996, 3-13.
44. Oppenheim, C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, 51(1), 1995, 18-27.
45. Oppenheim, C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology. Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 1997, 477-487.
46. Foucault, M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Random House, 1997.
47. Meadows, A.J. Communicating research. London: Academic Press, 1998.
48. Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L. and Bollacker, K. Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. IEEE Computer, 32(6), 1999, 67-71.