Bibliometric Analysis of Female Authorship Trends and Collaboration Dynamics Over JBMR's 30-Year History

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 2405-2414

  Wininger, Austin E ^a   Fischer, James P ^a   Likine, Elive F ^a   Gudeman, Andrew S ^a   Brinker, Alexander R ^a   Ryu, Jonathan ^a   Maupin, Kevin A ^a   Lunsford, Shatoria ^a   Whipple, Elizabeth C ^a   Loder, Randall T ^a   Kacena, Melissa A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

AUTHORSHIP TRENDS; BIBLIOMETRIC; COUNTRY; GENDER; TIME

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BONE METABOLISM; BONE MINERAL; EUROPE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MINERAL METABOLISM; MUSCLE METABOLISM; PUBLISHING; WRITING; BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATION; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; PUBLICATION; SEXUAL CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTOR;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; PUBLICATIONS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85028932695     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: 15234681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3232     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Washington DCThe World Bank. World development indicators—population, female (% of total) [Internet]. : The World Bank; 2017 Jan 3. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.FE.ZS. Accessed 2017 Jan 4.
2. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Education at a glance 2012 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2012 Sep 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
3. Shen H. Inequality quantified: mind the gender gap. Nature. 2013; 495(7439):22–4.
4. Cochran A, Hauschild T, Elder WB, et al. Perceived gender-based barriers to careers in academic surgery. Am J Surg. 2013; 206(2):263–8.
5. Holliday EB, Jagsi R, Wilson LD, Choi M, Thomas CR, Fuller CD. Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty. Acad Med. 2014; 89(5):767–73.
6. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raezer CL, et. al. The state of women in academic medicine [Internet]. Washington, DC: AAMC; 2014. Available from: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/The%20State%20of%20Women%20in%20Academic%20Medicine%202013-2014%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2016 Dec 18.
7. D'Amour D, Ferrada-videla M, San Martin Rodriguez L, Beaulieu MD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care. 2005; 19(Suppl 1):116–31.
8. Green BN, Johnson CD. Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future. J Chiropr Educ. 2015; 29(1):1–10.
9. Fitzpatrick S. A survey of staffing levels of medical clinical academics in UK medical schools as at 31 July 2014. London: Medical Schools Council; 2015.
10. Tornetta P, Siegel J, Mckay P, Bhandari M. Authorship and ethical considerations in the conduct of observational studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(Suppl 3): 61–7.
11. Mimouni M, Zayit-Soudry S, Segal O, et al. Trends in authorship of articles in major ophthalmology journals by gender, 2002–2014. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(8):1824–8.
12. Svider PF, Husain Q, Mauro KM, Folbe AJ, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Impact of mentoring medical students on scholarly productivity. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014; 4(2):138–42.
13. Bhattacharya S. Authorship issue explained. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010; 43(2):233–4.
14. Riesenberg D, Lundberg GD. The order of authorship: who's on first? JAMA. 1990; 264(14):1857.
15. Venkatraman V. Conventions of scientific authorship [Internet]. Science; 16 2010. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2010/04/conventions-scientific-authorship. Accessed 2017 Jan 8.
16. Avula J, Avula H. Authors, authorship order, the moving finger writes. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19(3):258–62.
17. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(3):281–7.
18. Duch J, Zeng XH, Sales-Pardo M, et al. The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PloS One. 2012; 7(12):e51332.
19. Piper CL, Scheel JR, Lee CI, Forman HP. Gender trends in radiology authorship: a 35-year analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206(1):3–7.
20. Slone RM. Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167(3):571–9.
21. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997; 278(7):579–85.
22. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994; 271(6):469–71.
23. Smith J. Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? BMJ. 1994; 309(6967):1456–7.
24. Kapoor N, Abola MV, Jena AB, Smith SE. Trends in authorship patterns in high-impact radiology publications, 1980–2013. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22(12):1587–91.
25. Leimu R, Koricheva J. Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience. 2005; 55(5):438–43.
26. Larivière V, Gingras Y, Sugimoto CR, Tsou A. Team size matters: collaboration and scientific impact since1900. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech. 2015; 66(7):1323–32.
27. Gal D, Glanzel W, Sipido KR. Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from1992 to 2012. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(16):1249–58.
28. Glänzel W, Schubert A. Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics. 2005; 65(3):323–42.
29. Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012; 60(5):768–75.
30. Scully C, Lodge H. Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? Br Dent J. 2005; 198(7):391–3.