Novel triblock co-polymer nanofibre system as an alternative support for embryonic stem cells growth and pluripotency

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2016, Pages E467-E476

  Perestrelo, Ana Rubina ^a   Mouffouk, Fouzi ^b   da Costa, Ana M Rosa ^c   Belo, José António ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^b KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^c UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

embryonic stem cell culture; embryonic stem cells; gelatin substitute; growth support; pluripotency; polymeric nanofibres

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; CELL CULTURE; COMPLEX NETWORKS; CONJUGATED POLYMERS; COPYRIGHTS; MAMMALS; NANOFIBERS; PEPTIDES; SELF ASSEMBLY;

EMBRYONIC STEM CELL CULTURE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GELATIN SUBSTITUTE; GROWTH SUPPORT; PLURIPOTENCY; POLYMER NANOFIBERS; POLYMERIC NANOFIBERS; STEM CELL CULTURE; TRI-BLOCK CO-POLYMERS;

STEM CELLS;

COPOLYMER; GLYCYLARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTYLSERINE; NANOFIBER; POLY(ETHYLENEGLYCOL BETA TRIMETHYLSILYLMETHACRYLATE BETA METHACRYLIC ACID); UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL CULTURE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 85028273733     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.1838     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson DG, Levenberg S, Langer R. 2004; Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 22: 863–866.
2. Bellis SL. 2011; Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials 32: 4205–4210.
3. Chiefari J, Chong YKB, Ercole F, et al. 1998; Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer: the RAFT process. Macromolecules 31: 5559–5562.
4. Duncan R. 2003; The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 347–360.
5. Michalska AE. 2007; Isolation and propagation of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and preparation of mouse embryonic feeder layer cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol 1: Unit 1C.3.
6. Evans MG, Kaufman MH. 1981; Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292: 154–156.
7. Fussell GW, Cooper SL. 2004; Endothelial cell adhesion on RGD-containing methacrylate terpolymers. J Biomed Mater Res A 70: 265–273.
8. Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X, et al. 2010; Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine (Lond); 5: 469–484.
9. Heng BC, Li J, Chen AK-L, et al. 2012; Translating human embryonic stem cells from two-dimensional to three-dimensional cultures in a defined medium on laminin- and vitronectin-coated surfaces. Stem Cells Dev 21: 1701–1715.
10. Kanani AG, Bahrami SH. 2010; Review on electrospun manofibers scaffold and biomedical applications. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 24: 93–115.
11. Kim PTW, Hoffman BG, Plesner A, et al. 2010; Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into endoderm without embryoid body formation. PLoS One 5: e14146.
12. Klim JR, Li L, Wrighton PJ, et al. 2010; A defined glycosaminoglycan-binding substratum for human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Methods 7: 989–994.
13. Koike M, Sakaki S, Amano Y, et al. 2007; Characterization of embryoid bodies of mouse embryonic stem cells formed under various culture conditions and estimation of differentiation status of such bodies. J Biosci Bioeng 104: 294–299.
14. Li Z, Leung M, Hopper R, et al. 2010; Feeder-free self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells in 3D porous natural polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 31: 404–412.
15. Lizundia E, Sarasua JR, D'Angelo F, et al. 2012; Biocompatible poly(l-lactide)/MWCNT nanocomposites: morphological characterization, electrical properties, and stem cell interaction. Macromol Biosci 12: 870–881.
16. Mormann W, Ferbitz J. 2002; Copolymers from methacrylic acid and trimethylsilyl methacrylate – synthesis, reactivity ratios and thermal properties. Macromol Chem Phys 203: 2616–2623.
17. Mouffouk F, Da Costa AMR, Martins J, et al. 2011; Development of a highly sensitive bacteria detection assay using fluorescent pH-responsive polymeric micelles. Biosens Bioelectron 26: 3517–3523.
18. Nur-E-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, et al. 2006; Three-dimensional nanofibrillar surfaces promote self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells (Dayton OH) 24: 426–433.
19. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 7: 1686–1691.
20. Sakai Y, Yoshiura Y, Nakazawa K. 2011; Embryoid body culture of mouse embryonic stem cells using microwell and micropatterned chips. J Biosci Bioeng 111: 85–91.
21. Shi G, Jin Y. 2010; Role of Oct4 in maintaining and regaining stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cell Res Ther 1: 39.
22. Silva FDS, Almeida PN, Rettore JVP, et al. 2012; Toward personalized cell therapies by using stem cells: seven relevant topics for safety and success in stem cell therapy. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012: 1–12.
23. Tsuji Y, Yoshimura N, Aoki H. 2008; Maintenance of undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells in suspension by the serum- and feeder-free defined culture condition. Dev Dynam 237: 2129–2138.
24. Vladkova TG. 2010; Surface engineered polymeric biomaterials with improved biocontact properties. Int J Polym Sci 2010: 1–22.
25. Ying Q, Wray J, Nichols J, et al. 2008; The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453: 519–523.