Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 89-99

  Holihan, Julie L ^a   Nguyen, Duyen H ^a   Nguyen, Mylan T ^a   Mo, Jiandi ^a   Kao, Lillian S ^a   Liang, Mike K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURGICAL MESH;

HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 85028272976     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392-398
2. Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578-583
3. Nguyen MT et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):415-421
4. Berger RL et al (2014) Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs. J Surg Res 192(2):426-431
5. Albino FP et al (2013) Does mesh location matter in abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature and a summary of recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1295-1304
6. Snyder CW et al (2011) Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(4):496-502
7. Berger RL et al (2013) Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):974-982
8. Novitsky YW et al (2007) Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. J Surg Res 140(1):6-11
9. Robinson TN et al (2005) Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg Endosc 19(12):1556-1560
10. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW (2002) Entero-colocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 6(3):144-147
11. Miller K, Junger W (1997) Ileocutaneous fistula formation following laparoscopic polypropylene mesh hernia repair. Surg Endosc 11(7):772-773
12. Cuccurullo D et al (2013) Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference. Hernia 17(5):557-566
13. Silecchia G et al (2015) Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed consensus development conference. Surg Endosc 29:2463-2484
14. Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006-1012
15. Slim K et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712-716
16. Kissane NA, Itani KM (2012) A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: what have we learned? Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):194S-202S
17. Jansen JP et al (2011) Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 1. Value Health 14(4):417-428
18. Hoaglin DC et al (2011) Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 2. Value Health 14(4):429-437
19. Gelman A, Rubin DB (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in biostatistics. Stat Methods Med Res 5(4):339-355
20. Salanti G, Marinho V, Higgins JP (2009) A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered. J Clin Epidemiol 62(8):857-864
21. Vinuela EF et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg 255(3):446-456
22. Afifi RY (2005) A prospective study between two different techniques for the repair of a large recurrent ventral hernia: a double mesh intraperitoneal repair versus onlay mesh repair. Hernia 9(4):310-315
23. Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP (2010) ["Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh-results of a five-years follow-up]. Magy Seb 63(5):302-311
24. Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 14(6):575-582
25. Deerenberg EB et al (2015) A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia 19(1):89-101
26. Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2014) Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 18(1):31-38
27. Guerin G, Turquier F (2013) Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach. Hernia 17(5):647-655
28. Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914
29. Brozek JL et al (2009) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 64(5):669-677