Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy : A systematic review and meta-analysis

JAMA Surgery

Volumn 149, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 415-421

  Nguyen, Mylan T ^a   Berger, Rachel L ^b   Hicks, Stephanie C ^c   Davila, Jessica A ^b   Li, Linda T ^b   Kao, Lillian S ^a   Liang, Mike K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HERNIA; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL MESH; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84901371664     PISSN: 21686254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16(2):179-183.
2. Muysoms FE,Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407-414.
3. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008- 2012. (Pubitemid 30214957)
4. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700.
5. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of themethodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377-384. (Pubitemid 28438523)
6. Gasparrini A, Armstrong B, Kenward MG. Multivariate meta-analysis for non-linear and other multi-parameter associations. Stat Med. 2012;31(29):3821-3839.
7. Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R. Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg. 2001;88(10):1321-1323. (Pubitemid 32955409)
8. AsolatiM, Huerta S, Sarosi G, Harmon R, Bell C, Anthony T. Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg. 2006;192(5):627-630. (Pubitemid 44634355)
9. Berger RL. Clapp ML, Chu C, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK. Suture repair vs prolene hernia system for elective primary ventral hernia repairs. In Submission.
10. Bowley DM, Boffard KD. Penetrating lung hernia with pulmonary evisceration: case report. J Trauma. 2001;50(3):560-561. (Pubitemid 32259824)
11. Eryilmaz R, SahinM, Tekelioglu MH. Which repair in umbilical hernia of adults: primary or mesh? Int Surg. 2006;91(5):258-261. (Pubitemid 44594962)
12. Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF,Weidema WF. Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia. 2005;9(4):334-337. (Pubitemid 43118537)
13. Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K. Umbilical hernia repair with the Prolene hernia system. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):61-64. (Pubitemid 40828608)
14. Sanjay P, Reid TD, Davies EL, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A. Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia. 2005;9(3):248-251. (Pubitemid 43192945)
15. Stabilini C, Stella M, FrascioM, et al. Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias: ten-year experience. Ann Ital Chir. 2009;80(3):183-187.
16. Aslani N, Brown CJ. Doesmesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2010;14(5):455-462.
17. Scott N, Go PM, Graham P, McCormack K, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh vs non-mesh for groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10):CD002197. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
18. den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD006438. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
19. Lau H, Patil NG. Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(12):2016-2020.
20. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW. A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(2):180-189.
21. Cohn LD, Becker BJ. How meta-analysis increases statistical power. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(3):243-253. (Pubitemid 37268945)
22. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
23. Riley RD. Multivariate meta-analysis: the effect of ignoring within-study correlation. J R Stat Soc. 2009;172(4):1-23.