|
|
Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 302-311
|
|
["Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh--results of a five-years follow-up].;Kedvezobb mutéti eredmények "onlay" hálóval, mint "sublay" helyzetben beültetettel. Varrattal, illetve hálóbeültetéssel történo hasfal-rekonstrukció prospektiv, randomizált, multicentrikus vizsgálata--ötéves utánkövetés eredeményei.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL WALL;
ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PATHOLOGY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RECURRENT DISEASE;
SURGERY;
SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;
SUTURING METHOD;
TIME;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
ABDOMINAL WALL;
ADULT;
AGED;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HERNIA, VENTRAL;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RECURRENCE;
SURGICAL MESH;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
SUTURE TECHNIQUES;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
|
|
EID: 79955978928
PISSN: 00250295
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1556/maseb.63.2010.5.3 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (30)
|
|
References (0)
|
