Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 620-628

  Barker, Alex J ^a   Van Ooij, Pim ^a   Bandi, Krishna ^b   Garcia, Julio ^a   Albaghdadi, Mazen ^b   McCarthy, Patrick ^b   Bonow, Robert O ^b   Carr, James ^a   Collins, Jeremy ^a   Malaisrie, S Chris ^b   Markl, Michael ^a,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

4D flow MRI; aortic dilatation; aortic valve disease; viscous energy loss

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FLUID MECHANICS; VELOCITY;

AORTIC DILATATION; AORTIC STENOSIS; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AORTIC VALVES; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; MECHANICAL ENERGY LOSS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY FIELDS; VISCOUS ENERGY;

BLOOD VESSELS;

ADULT; AORTA FLOW; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENERGY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; VELOCITY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISCOSITY;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 85028258324     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24962     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L, Tongue AG, Rieu R, Garcia D, Pibarot P,. Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 291-298.
2. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J, Lorenz R, Bock J, Bauer S, Schulz-Menger J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F,. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 457-466.
3. Burk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z, Barker A, Russe M, Geiger J, Frydrychowicz A, Langer M, Markl M,. Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 84.
4. Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Munoz Del Rio A, Russe MF, Bock J, Harloff A, Markl M,. Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1122-1130.
5. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 118: e523-e661.
6. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M,. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 1-23.
7. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N,. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart 2010; 96: 1463-1468.
8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG,. Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 169-180.
9. Pape LA, Tsai TT, Isselbacher EM, et al. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 2007; 116: 1120-1127.
10. Akins CW, Travis B, Yoganathan AP,. Energy loss for evaluating heart valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 820-833.
11. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 2003; 361: 1241-1246.
12. Dyverfeldt P, Hope MD, Tseng EE, Saloner D,. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 64-71.
13. Whitehead KK, Pekkan K, Kitajima HD, Paridon SM, Yoganathan AP, Fogel MA,. Nonlinear power loss during exercise in single-ventricle patients after the Fontan: insights from computational fluid dynamics. Circulation 2007; 116: I165-I171.
14. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting JPE, Ebbers T,. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 850-858.
15. Hope MD, Hope TA, Ordovas K, Meadows A, Saloner D, Reddy GP, Alley MT, Higgins CB,. Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2008. p. 1373.
16. Reiter G, Reiter U, Kovacs G, Kainz B, Schmidt K, Maier R, Olschewski H, Rienmueller R,. Magnetic resonance derived 3-dimensional blood flow patterns in the main pulmonary artery as a marker of pulmonary hypertension and a measure of elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1: 23-30.
17. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Sakr F, Durand LG,. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity-a new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 2000; 101: 765-771.
18. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN,. Transport Phenomena. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1960.
19. Bahlmann E, Cramariuc D, Gerdts E, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber CA, Eriksen E, Wachtell K, Chambers J, Kuck KH, Ray S,. Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 555-562.
20. Heinrich RS, Marcus RH, Ensley AE, Gibson DE, Yoganathan AP,. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 509-515.
21. Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA, Zaitsev M, Jung B, Weigang E, Langer M, Hennig J, Frydrychowicz A,. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 824-831.
22. Bock J, Kreher BW, Hennig J, Markl M,. Optimized pre-processing of time-resolved 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI data. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, 2007. p. 3138.
23. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman DA,. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46: 1097-1112.
24. Yap CH, Dasi LP, Yoganathan AP,. Dynamic hemodynamic energy loss in normal and stenosed aortic valves. J Biomech Eng 2010; 132: 021005.
25. Venkatachari AK, Halliburton SS, Setser RM, White RD, Chatzimavroudis GP,. Noninvasive quantification of fluid mechanical energy losses in the total cavopulmonary connection with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 101-109.
26. Barker AJ, Staehle F, Bock J, Jung BA, Markl M,. Analysis of complex cardiovascular flow using three-component acceleration-encoded MRI. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 50-61.
27. Saikrishnan N, Yap CH, Milligan NC, Vasilyev NV, Yoganathan AP,. In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40: 1760-1775.
28. Dyverfeldt P, Gardhagen R, Sigfridsson A, Karlsson M, Ebbers T,. On MRI turbulence quantification. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 913-922.
29. Kvitting JP, Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Franzen S, Wigstrom L, Bolger AF, Ebbers T,. In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 1075-1080.