Erratum: In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry (Annals of Biomedical Engineering, (2012) 40, 8, (1760-1775), 10.1007/s10439-012-0527-2);In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1760-1775

  Saikrishnan, Neelakantan ^a   Yap, Choon Hwai ^a   Milligan, Nicole C ^a   Vasilyev, Nikolay V ^b   Yoganathan, Ajit P ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Calcification; Fluid dynamics; Fluid mechanics; Jet eccentricity; Reynolds shear stress; Stenosis; Turbulent kinetic energy; Viscous shear stress

Indexed keywords

BIOMINERALIZATION; BLOOD VESSELS; BONE; CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); ELASTICITY; FLOW VISUALIZATION; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID MECHANICS; HEMODYNAMICS; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; TURBULENT FLOW; VELOCIMETERS; VELOCITY; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

BICUSPID AORTIC VALVES; FLOW CHARAC-TERISTICS; MECHANICAL ENVIRONMENT; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRIES; REYNOLDS SHEAR STRESS; STENOSIS; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY; VISCOUS SHEAR;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ANIMAL; AORTA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; AORTA; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SWINE;

EID: 84864573129     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0582-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Aicher, D., et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in bicuspid aortic valve disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83(4):1290-1294, 2007.
2. Balachandran, K., et al. Elevated cyclic stretch alters matrix remodeling in aortic valve cusps: Implications for degenerative aortic valve disease. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 296(3):H756-H764, 2009.
3. Batchelor, G. K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge Mathematical Library: Cambridge, UK, 1967, p. 660.
4. Bauer, M., et al. Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. J. Heart Valve Dis. 15(5):594-600, 2006.
5. Bauer, M., et al. Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J. Card. Surg. 21(3):218-220, 2006.
6. Bellhouse, B. J., and T. Talbot. The fluid mechanics of the aortic valve. J. Fluid Mech. 35(4):721-735, 1969.
7. Beppu, S., et al. Rapidity of progression of aortic stenosis in patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Am. J. Cardiol. 71(4):322-327, 1993.
8. Bonow, R. O., et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 114(5):e84-e231, 2006.
9. Braverman, A. C., et al. The bicuspid aortic valve. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 30(9):470-522, 2005.
10. Cotrufo, M., et al. Different patterns of extracellular matrix protein expression in the convexity and the concavity of the dilated aorta with bicuspid aortic valve: Preliminary results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 130(2):504-511, 2005.
11. Dasi, L. P., et al. Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta. Phys. Fluids 19(6):067105(1)-067109(17), 2007.
12. Den Reijer, P. M., et al. Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 12:4, 2010.
13. Garg, V., et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature 437(7056):270-274, 2005.
14. Giersiepen, M., et al. Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses-in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. Int. J. Artif. Organs 13(5):300-306, 1990.
15. Girdauskas, E., et al. Is aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease a congenital defect or a result of abnormal hemodynamics? A critical reappraisal of a one-sided argument. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 39(6):809-814, 2011.
16. Goland, S., et al. Assessment of aortic stenosis by threedimensional echocardiography: An accurate and novel approach. Heart 93(7):801-807, 2007.
17. Hope, T. A., et al. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using fourdimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26:1471-1479, 2007.
18. Hope, M. D., et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: Four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255(1):53-61, 2010.
19. Keane, R. D., and R. J. Adrian. Optimization of particle image velocimeters. I. Double pulsed systems. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1(11):1202-1215, 1990.
20. Keane, M. G., et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation 102(19 Suppl 3):III35-III39, 2000.
21. Kline, S. J., and F. A. McClintock. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech. Eng. 75:3-8, 1953.
22. Leo, H. L., et al. Fluid dynamic assessment of three polymeric heart valves using particle image velocimetry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34(6):936-952, 2006.
23. Nistri, S., et al. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 82(1):19-22, 1999.
24. Pachulski, R. T., A. L. Weinberg, and K. L. Chan. Aortic aneurysm in patients with functionally normal or minimally stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Am. J. Cardiol. 67(8):781-782, 1991.
25. Peskin, C. S. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J. Comput. Phys. 25(3):220-252, 1977.
26. Pouleur, A. C., et al. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26(6):1436-1443, 2007.
27. Pouleur, A. C., et al. Aortic valve area assessment: Multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244(3):745-754, 2007.
28. Prasad, A. K., et al. Effect of resolution on the speed and accuracy of particle image velocimetry interrogation. Exp. Fluids 13(2-3):105-116, 1992.
29. Querzoli, G., S. Fortini, and A. Cenedese. Effect of the prosthetic mitral valve on vortex dynamics and turbulence of the left ventricular flow. Phys. Fluids 22:041901, 2010.
30. Roberts, W. C. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am. J. Cardiol. 26(1):72-83, 1970.
31. Roberts, W. C., and J. M. Ko. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 111(7):920-925, 2005.
32. Robicsek, F., et al. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77(1):177-185, 2004.
33. Saikrishnan, N. Studies in wall turbulence using dual plane particle image velocimetry and direct numerical simulation data. In: Aerospace Engineering & Mechanics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 2010, p. 224.
34. Sievers, H. H., and C. Schmidtke. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133(5):1226-1233, 2007.
35. Sucosky, P., et al. Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4-And TGF-beta1-depenDent pathway. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29(2):254-260, 2009.
36. Ward, C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 83(1):81-85, 2000.
37. Warnes, C. A., et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52(23):e1-e121, 2008.
38. Weinberg, E. J., and M. R. Kaazempur Mofrad. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. J. Biomech. 41(16):3482-3487, 2008.
39. Xing, Y., et al. Cyclic pressure affects the biological properties of porcine aortic valve leaflets in a magnitude and frequency depenDent manner. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32(11):1461-1470, 2004.
40. Yap, C. H., et al. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11:171-182, 2011.
41. Yap, C. H., et al. Experimental technique of measuring dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. J. Biomech. Eng. 133(6):15, 2011.
42. Yap, C. H., et al. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11:231-244, 2011.