A Roadmap for Assessing Student Learning Using the New Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 510-514

  Oakleaf, Megan ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028094015     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ellsworth E. Teaching positions: Difference pedagogy and the power of address 1997, Teachers College Press, New York.
2. Holmes C., Oakleaf M. The official (and unofficial) rules for norming rubrics successfully. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2014, 39(6):599-602.
3. Land R., Cousin G., Meyer J.H.F., Davis P. Conclusion: Implications for threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 2006, 195-206. Routledge, London. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land (Eds.).
4. Land R., Meyer J.H.F. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (5): Dynamics of assessment. Threshold concepts and transformational learning 2010, 61-79. Sense, Rotterdam. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land, C. Baillie (Eds.).
5. Land R., Meyer J.H.F., Baillie C. Editor's preface. Threshold concepts and transformational learning 2010, ix-xlii. Sense, Rotterdam. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land, C. Baillie (Eds.).
6. Meyer J.H.F., Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 2006, 3-18. Routledge, London. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land (Eds.).
7. Meyer J.H.F., Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 2006, 19-32. Routledge, London. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land (Eds.).
8. Oakleaf M. Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of information literacy assessment tools. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 2008, 8(3):233-253.
9. Oakleaf M. The information literacy instruction assessment cycle: A guide for increasing student learning and improving librarian instructional skills. Journal of Documentation 2009, 65(4):539-560.
10. Oakleaf M., Belanger J., Graham C. Choosing and using assessment management systems: What librarians need to learn. Proceedings of the ACRL Fifteenth National Conference 2013, 97-106. Retrieved from, Association Of College And Research Libraries, Indianapolis.
11. Rhem J. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. National Teaching and Learning Forum Newsletter 2013, May, 22(4). (Retrieved from https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/teaching-talk/and-after-students-get-it-threshold-concepts).
12. Shanahan M., Meyer J.H.F. The troublesome nature of a threshold concept in economics. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 2006, 100-114. Routledge, London. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land (Eds.).
13. Taylor C. Threshold concepts in biology: Do they fit the definition?. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 2006, 87-99. Routledge, London. J.H.F. Meyer, R. Land (Eds.).
14. Townsend L., Hofer A., Brunetti K. Threshold concepts and information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 2011, 11(3):853-869.
15. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design 2005, Association of Supervision And Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.