The Evolution of Trade and Scientific Collaboration Networks in the Global Wine Sector: A Longitudinal Study Using Network Analysis

Economic Geography

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 311-334

  Cassi, Lorenzo ^a,b   Morrison, Andrea ^c,d   Ter Wal, Anne L J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

^b Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST)   (France)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Globalization; International trade; Longitudinal network analysis; Scientific collaboration network; Wine sector

Indexed keywords

COMMODITY; GLOBALIZATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SECONDARY SECTOR INDUSTRY;

EID: 85027954690     PISSN: 00130095     EISSN: 19448287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01154.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson, K. 2004. The world's wine markets: Globalization at work. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
2. Anderson, K., and Norman, D. 2006. Compendium of wine statistics. Adelaide, Australia: Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide.
3. Anderson, K.; Norman, D.; and Wittwer, G. 2003. Globalization of the world's wine markets. World Economy 26:659-87.
4. Archibugi, D. 2007. Introduction to the Special Issue on Knowledge and Innovation in the Globalizing World Wine Industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalization 3:125-26.
5. Aylward, D. K. 2003. A documentary of innovation support among New World wine industries. Journal of Wine Research 14:31-43.
6. Aylward, D. K. 2004. Innovation-export linkages within different cluster models: A case study from the Australian wine industry. Prometheus 22:423-35.
7. Aylward, D. K. 2006. Innovation lock-in: Unlocking research and development path dependency in the Australian wine industry. Strategic Change 15:361-72.
8. Balconi, M.; Brusoni, S.; and Orsenigo, L. 2010. In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy 39:1-13.
9. Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. 1999. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21:375-95.
10. Borgatti, S. P.; Everett, M. G.; and Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET VI. Lekington, Ky.: Analytical Technologies.
11. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
12. Bush, V. 1945. Science: The endless frontier: A report to the president. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Cassi, L.; Morrison, A.; and Rabellotti, R. 2011. The changing geography of science in wine: Evidence from emerging countries. In: Innovation and technological catch-up: The changing geography of wine production, eds. E. Giuliani, A. Morrison, and R. Rabellotti, 43-69. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
14. Chase-Dunn, C., and Grimes, P. 1995. World-systems analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 21:387-417.
15. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Suppl.):95-120.
16. Cusmano, L.; Morrison, A.; and Rabellotti, R. 2010. Catching up and sectoral systems of innovation: A comparative study on the wine sector in Chile, Italy and South Africa. World Development 38:1588-1602.
17. D'Este, P., and Patel, P. 2007. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36:1295-1313.
18. Edquist, C. 2005. Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In: Oxford handbook of innovation, eds. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, 181-208. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
19. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industries-governments relations. Research Policy 29:109-23.
20. European Union. 2007. Towards a sustainable European wine sector. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.
21. Fagiolo, G.; Reyes, J. A.; and Schiavo, S. 2008. On the topological properties of the World Trade Web: A weighted network analysis. Physica A 387:3868-73.
22. Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 2:153-8.
23. Fleming, L.; Mingo, S.; and Chen, D. 2007. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 52:443-75.
24. Fontana, R.; Geuna, A.; and Matt, M. 2006. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy 35:309-23.
25. Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S., Scott, P.; and Trow, P. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
26. Giuliani, E., and Arza, V. 2009. What drives the formation of "valuable" university-industry linkages? Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy 38:906-21.
27. Giuliani, E.; Morrison, A.; Pietrobelli, C.; and Rabellotti, R. 2010. Why do researchers collaborate with industry? An analysis of the wine sector in Chile, Italy and South Africa. Research Policy 39:748-61.
28. Giuliani, E.; Morrison, A.; and Rabellotti, R., eds. 2011. Innovation and technological catch-up: The changing geography of wine Production. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
29. Glänzel, W. 2001. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51:69-115.
30. Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A.; and Czerwon, H.-J. 1999. A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995). Scientometrics 45:185-202.
31. Glänzel, W., and Veugelers, R. 2006. Science for wine: A bibliometric assessment of wine and grape research for wine producing and consuming countries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 57:23-32.
32. Grabher, G. 1993. The embedded firm: On the sociometrics of industrial networks. New York: Routledge.
33. Gwynne, R. N. 2008. UK retail concentration, Chilean wine producers and value chains. The Geographical Journal 174:97-108.
34. Hanneman, R., and Riddle, M. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California at Riverside. Available online:
35. Hargittai, E., and Centeno, M. A. 2001. Introduction: Defining a global geography. American Behavioral Scientist 44:1545-60.
36. Katz, J. S., and Martin, B. R. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26:1-18.
37. Keller, W. 2004. International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature 42:752-82.
38. Kim, S., and Shin, E-H. 2002. A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: A social network approach. Social Forces 81:445-68.
39. Kline, S. J., and Rosenberg, N. 1986. An overview on innovation. In The positive sum strategy, eds. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, 275-306. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
40. Krugman, P., and Obstfeld, M. 2009. International economics, 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
41. Lagendijk, A. 2004. Global "Lifeworlds'" versus local "systemworlds": How flying winemakers produce global wines in interconnected locales. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie [Journal of economic and social geography] 95:511-26.
42. Linder, S. B. 1961. An essay on trade and transformation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.
43. Mahutga, M. C. 2006. The persistence of structural inequality? A network analysis of international trade, 1965-2000. Social Forces 84:1863-89.
44. Mansfield, E. 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20: 1-12.
45. Mazzoleni, R., and Nelson, R. R. 2007. Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy 36:1512-28.
46. McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415-44.
47. Morrison, A., and Rabellotti, R. 2007. The role of research in wine: The emergence of a regional research area in an Italian wine production system. International Journal of Technology and Globalization 3:155-78.
48. Nadvi, K. 2008. Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography 8:323-43.
49. Nelson, R. R. 2008. What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy 37:1-11.
50. OIV. 2009. State of vitiviniculture world report: March 2009. Available online:
51. Pardey, P. G., and Beintema, N. M. 2001. Slow magic: Agricultural R&D a century after mendel. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
52. Romer, P. M. 1994. The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:3-22.
53. Salk, J. E.; Nielsen, F.; and Marks, G. 2001. Patterns of cooperation among regional offices in Brussels: Homophily, complementarity, and national embeddedness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, 4-7 April.
54. Smith, D. A., and White, D. R. 1992. Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965-1980. Social Forces 70:857-93.
55. Snyder, D., and Kick, E. 1979. Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955-1970: A multiple network approach. American Journal of Sociology 84:1096-1123.
56. Unwin, T. 1991. Wine and the vine: A historical geography of viticulture and the wine trade. London: Routledge.
57. Wasserman, F., and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
58. Yeung, H. W.-c. 2002. The limits to globalization theory: A geographic perspective on global economic change. Economic Geography 78:285-305.