A GIS toolbox for measuring and mapping person-based space-time accessibility

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 262-278

  Charleux, Laure ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMIZABLE; SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY; TIME-GEOGRAPHY; USER FRIENDLY;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ACCESSIBILITY; GIS; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85027951277     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12115     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arentze T A, Borgers A W J, and Timmermans H J P 1994 Geographical information systems and the measurement of accessibility in the context of multipurpose travel: a new approach. Geographical Systems 1: 87-102
2. Ashiru O, Polak J, and Noland R 2003 Space-time user benefit and utility accessibility measures for individual activity schedules. Transportation Research Record 1854: 62-73
3. Banos A, Boffet-Mas A, Chardonnel S, Lang C, Marilleau N, and Thévenin T 2010 MIRO: des trajectoires individuelles à la ville en mouvement. In: Antoni J-P (ed) Modéliser la ville?: formes urbaines et politiques de transport, Paris, Economica: 272-302
4. Batty M and Longley P A 1987 Urban shapes as fractals. Area 19: 215-221
5. Brunow S and Gründer M 2013 The impact of activity chaining on the duration of daily activities. Transportation 40: 981-1001
6. Casas I, Horner M W, and Weber J 2009 A comparison of three methods for identifying transport-based exclusion: A case study of children's access to urban opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 3: 227-245
7. Chen B Y, Li Q, Wang D, Shaw S-L, Lam W H K, Yuan H, and Fang Z 2013 Reliable space-time prisms under travel time uncertainty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103: 1502-1521
8. Chen J, Shaw S-L, Yu H, Lu F, Chai Y, and Jia Q 2011 Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: A space-time GIS approach. Journal of Transport Geography 19: 394-404
9. Corbett J 2001 Torsten Hägerstrand: Time Geography. WWW document, http://www.spatial.ucsb.edu/classics/content.php/29
10. Crooks A 2013 The use of agent-based modelling for studying the social and physical environment of cities. In: De Roo G, J Hilier, and Van Wezemael J (eds) Complexity and Planning: Systems, Assemblages and Simulations. Burlington, VT, Ashgate: 385-408
11. Delafontaine M, Neutens T, and van de Weghe N 2012 A GIS toolkit for measuring and mapping space-time accessibility from a place-based perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26: 1131-1154
12. Farber S, Neutens T, Miller H J, and Li X 2013 The social interaction potential of metropolitan regions: A time-geographic measurement approach using joint accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103: 483-504
13. Gobillon L, Selod H, and Zenou Y 2007 The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies 44: 2401-2427
14. Hägerstrand T 1970 What about people in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association 24: 6-21
15. Kim H-M and Kwan M-P 2003 Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 5: 71
16. Kitamura R, Yamamoto T, Kishizawa K, and Pendyala R 2000 Stochastic frontier models of prism vertices. Transportation Research Record 1718: 18-26
17. Kwan M-P 1998 Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30: 191-216
18. Kwan M-P 1999 Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. Professional Geographer 51: 210-227
19. Kwan M-P 2004 GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography 86B: 267-280
20. Kwan M-P and Weber J 2008 Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction. Applied Geography 28: 110-123
21. Lenntorp B 1979 The PESASP simulation model: Its time-geographic framework and ways of application, Stockholm. Geographische Zeitschrift 67: 336-353
22. Li H, Campbell H, and Fernandez S 2013 Residential segregation, spatial mismatch and economic growth across US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 50: 2642-2660
23. Miller H J 1991 Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5: 287-301
24. Miller H J 1999 Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis 31: 1-26
25. Miller H J 2007 Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass 1: 503-535
26. Miller H J and Wu Y-H 2000 GIS software for measuring space-time accessibility in transportation planning and analysis. GeoInformatica 4: 141
27. Mlekuž D 2010 Time geography, GIS and archaeology. In Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain: 443-445 (available at http://www.academia.edu/376168/Time_geography_GIS_and_archaeology)
28. Morang M n.d. Yay, transit! Using GTFS data in ArcGIS Network Analyst. WWW document, http://www.transit.melindamorang.com/
29. Morris J M, Dumble P L, and Wigan M R 1979 Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General 13: 91-109
30. Neutens T, Delafontaine M, Scott D M, and De Maeyer P 2012 A GIS-based method to identify spatiotemporal gaps in public service delivery. Applied Geography 32: 253-264
31. Neutens T, Schwanen T, and Witlox F 2011 The prism of everyday life: Towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews 31: 25-47
32. Neutens T, Schwanen T, Witlox F, and Maeyer P D 2008 My space or your space? Towards a measure of joint accessibility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32: 331-342
33. Neutens T, Versichele M, and Schwanen T 2010 Arranging place and time: A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities. Applied Geography 30: 561-575
34. Pendyala R M, Yamamoto T, and Kitamura R 2002 On the formulation of time-space prisms to model constraints on personal activity-travel engagement. Transportation 29: 73-94
35. Ratcliffe J H 2006 A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 43: 261-291
36. Richardson A J and Young W 1982 A measure of linked- trip accessibility. Transportation Planning and Technology 7: 73-82
37. Ritsema van Eck J, Burghouwt G, and Dijst M 2005 Lifestyles, spatial configurations and quality of life in daily travel: an explorative simulation study. Journal of Transport Geography 13: 123-134
38. Schwanen T, Kwan M-P, and Ren F 2008 How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum 39: 2109-2121
39. Soo J 2009 Space-time prism vertices: Exploring gender differences and multiple-peak distributions in arrival and departure times. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 9: 380-396
40. Weber J 2003 Individual accessibility and distance from major employment centers: An examination using space-time measures. Journal of Geographical Systems 5: 51-70
41. Weber J and Kwan M-P 2002 Bringing time back in: A study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. Professional Geographer 54: 226
42. Widener M J, Farber S, Neutens T, and Horner M W 2013 Using urban commuting data to calculate a spatiotemporal accessibility measure for food environment studies. Health and Place 21: 1-9
43. Wu Y and Miller H J 2001 Computational tools for measuring space-time accessibility within transportation networks with dynamic flow. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 4: 1-14
44. Wu Y-H, Miller H J, and Hung M-C 2001 A GIS-based decision support system for analysis of route choice in congested urban road networks. Journal of Geographical Systems 3: 3-24
45. Yamamoto T, Kitamura R, and Pendyala R M 2004 Comparative analysis of time-space prism vertices for out-of-home activity engagement on working and nonworking days. Environment and Planning B 31: 235-250