How is credit given to networking centres in their publications? A case study of the spanish ciber research structures

Scientometrics

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 923-938

  Morillo, Fernanda ^a   Costas, Rodrigo ^b   Bordons, María ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE HISTORIA   (Spain)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Address analysis; Author analysis; Bibliometric data collection; Funding acknowledgements; Gastroenterology Hepatology; Networking centres; Psychiatry

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027946045     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1564-z     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Caron, E., & van Eck, N. J. (2014). Large scale author name disambiguation using rule-based scoring and clustering. In Proceedings of STI 2014 Leiden. Retrieved from http://sti2014.cwts.nl/download/f-y2w2.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
2. CIBERESP (2007). FIRMA CIBERESP. Retrieved from http://www.ciberesp.es/files/Firma_CIBERESP.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
3. Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). Algoritmos para solventar la falta de normalización de nombres de autor en los estudios bibliométricos. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 21(42), 13-32.
4. Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the ‘reward triangle’: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and ‘peer interactive communication’ in scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1647-1661. doi:10.1002/asi.22692
5. Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz-Menéndez, L., & Martínez, C. (2012). Research centers in transition: Patterns of converge and diversity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 18-42. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9168-5
6. Delgado Rodríguez, M. (2012). CIBERESP: Un instrumento para la promoción y la difusión de la investigación de excelencia española. Gaceta Sanitaria, 26(5), 393-394. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.05.008
7. Demotes-Mainard, J., & Ohmann, C. (2005). European clinical research infrastructures network: Promoting harmonisation and quality in European clinical research. The Lancet, 365(9454), 107-108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17720-4.
8. Díaz-Faes, A. A., & Bordons, M. (2014). Acknowledgements in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1834-1849. doi:10.1002/asi.23081.
9. García-Zorita, C., Martín-Moreno, C., Lascurain-Sánchez, M. L., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2006). Institutional addresses in the Web of Science: The effects on scientific evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 32(4), 378-383. doi:10.1177/0165551506065813.
10. Garner, J., Porter, A. L., Newman, N. C., & Crowl, T. A. (2012). Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program. Research Evaluation, 21(2), 89-104. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs004.
11. Jiang, Y., Zheng, H.-T., Wang, X., Lu, B., & Wu, K. (2011). Affiliation disambiguation for constructing semantic digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1029-1041. doi:10.1002/asi.21538.
12. Méndez Vásquez, R. I., Suñén Pinyol, E., Olivé Vázquez, G., Cervelló González, R., & Camí, J. (2009). Caracterización bibliométrica de la produccién en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (EPI-SP) de España, 1997-2006. Barcelona. Retrieved from http://bac.fundaciorecerca.cat/ciberesp/docs/Bibliometria_CIBERESP.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
13. Morillo, F., Díaz-Faes, A. A., González-Albo, B., & Moreno, L. (2014). Do networking centres perform better? An exploratory analysis in Psychiatry and Gastroenterology/Hepatology in Spain. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1401-1416. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1183-5.
14. Morillo, F., Santabárbara, I., & Aparicio, J. (2013). The automatic normalisation challenge: Detailed addresses identification. Scientometrics, 95(3), 953-966. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0965-0
15. Praal, F., Kosten, J., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. S. (2013). Ranking universities: The challenge of affiliated institutes. In Translational twists and turns: Science and socioeconomic endeavour. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.forschungsinfo.de/STI2013/download/STI_2013_Proceedings.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
16. Rank, D., & Williams, D. (1999). Partial benefit/cost in the evaluation of the Canadian networks of centres of excellence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 121-129. doi:10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00048-2
17. Reijnhoudt, L., Costas, R., Noyons, E., Boerner, K., & Scharnhorst, A. (2013). ‘Seed ? Expand’: A validated methodology for creating high quality publication oeuvres of individual researchers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.5177. Accessed December 3, 2014
18. Sirtes, D. (2013). Funding acknowledgments for the German Research Foundation (DFG). The dirty data of the Web of Science database and how to clean it up. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.issi2013.org/Images/ISSI_Proceedings_Volume_I.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
19. Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009). Author name disambiguation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1-43. doi:10.1002/aris.2009.1440430113.
20. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37-47. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001.
21. Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2014). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. Retrieved from http://media.eurekalert.org/aaasnewsroom/MCM/FIL_000000001425/funding_and_research_impact-rev_2014.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2014