The automatic normalisation challenge: Detailed addresses identification

Scientometrics

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 953-966

  Morillo, Fernanda ^a   Santabárbara, Ignacio ^a   Aparicio, Javier ^a  

^a la Tecnologia y la Innovacion   (Spain)

Author keywords

Addresses normalisation; Automatic procedures; Bibliometric indicators; Web of Science databases

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877623036     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-0965-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008). The measurement of Italian Universities' research productivity by a non-parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76(2), 225-244.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). National research assessment exercises: The effects of changing the rules of the game during the game. Scientometrics, 88(1), 229-238.
3. Almeida, J. A. S., Pais, A. A. C. C., & Formosinho, S. J. (2009). Science indicators and science patterns in Europe. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 134-142.
4. Bador, P., & Lafouge, T. (2005). Rédaction des adresses sur les publications. Un manque de rigueur défavorable aux universités françaises dans les classements internationaux. La Presse Médicale, 34(9), 633-636.
5. Bornmann, L., & Ozimek, A. (2012). Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 505-512.
6. Butler, L. (1999). Who "owns" this publication? Problems with assigning research publications on the basis of addresses. In Proceedings of the seventh conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 87-96). Universidad de Colima, México.
7. D'Angelo, C. A., Giuffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2011). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 257-269.
8. De Bruin, R. E., & Moed, H. F. (1990). The unification of addresses in scientific publications. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90. Selection of papers submitted to the 2nd international conference on bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics, London, Ontario, Canada, July 5-7, 1989 (pp. 65-78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. FECYT (2007). Workshop on "normalisation of institutions for bibliometric uses", Barcelona.
10. Feller, I., & Gamota, G. (2007). Science indicators as reliable evidence. Minerva, 45(1), 17-30.
11. Fernández, M. T., Cabrero, A., Zulueta, M. A., & Gómez, I. (1993). Constructing a relational database for bibliometric analysis. Research Evaluation, 3(1), 55-62.
12. Gálvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006). The unification of institutional addresses applying parameterized finite state graphs (P FSG). Scientometrics, 69(2), 323-345.
13. Gálvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). Standardizing formats of corporate source data. Scientometrics, 70(1), 3-26.
14. García-Zorita, C., Martín-Moreno, C., Lascurain-Sánchez, M. L., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2006). Institutional addresses in the Web of Science: the effects on scientific evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 32(4), 378-383.
15. Gurney, T., Horlings, E., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators. Scientometrics, 91(2), 435-449.
16. Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2003). Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics, 58(3), 587-608.
17. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). Desktop scientometrics. Scientometrics, 38(1), 141-153.
18. Mallig, N. (2010). A relational database for bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 564-580.
19. Morillo, F., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Moreno, L. (2013). Towards the automation of address identification. Scientometrics, 94(1), 207-224. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-012-0733-6.
20. National Science Board (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
21. OST (2010) Indicateurs de sciences et de technologies. Édition 2010. Rapport de l'Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques établi sous la direction de Ghislaine Filliatreau par l'équipe de l'Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST), Paris.
22. Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2009). Synthetic hybrid indicators based on scientific collaboration to quantify and evaluate individual research results. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 91-101.
23. Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2008). A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74(2), 223-236.
24. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.
25. Wang, J., Berzins, K., Hicks, D., Melkers, J., Xiao, F., & Pinheiro, D. (2012). A boosted-trees method for name disambiguation. Scientometrics, 93(2), 391-411.