A facile preparation of novel positively charged MOF/chitosan nanofiltration membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 525, Issue , 2017, Pages 269-276

  Ma, Xiao Hua ^a,b   Yang, Zhe ^b   Yao, Zhi Kan ^b   Xu, Zhen Liang ^a   Tang, Chuyang Y ^b  

^a EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chitosan; Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); Morphology; Nanofiltration; Positive charge

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; CHITOSAN; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANOMETALLICS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE;

FACILE PREPARATION; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; METALORGANIC FRAMEWORKS (MOFS); MULTIVALENT CATIONS; POLYMERIC MATRICES; POSITIVE CHARGES; POSITIVELY CHARGED; ROD-LIKE STRUCTURES;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CHITOSAN; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

ANATOMY; CATIONS; CHITOSAN;

EID: 85027938511     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. [1] Marchetti, P., Jimenez Solomon, M.F., Szekely, G., Livingston, A.G., Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. Chem. Rev. 114 (2014), 10735–10806.
2. [2] Mohammad, A.W., Teow, Y.H., Ang, W.L., Chung, Y.T., Oatley-Radcliffe, D.L., Hilal, N., Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects. Desalination 356 (2015), 226–254.
3. [3] Cheng, S., Oatley, D.L., Williams, P.M., Wright, C.J., Positively charged nanofiltration membranes: review of current fabrication methods and introduction of a novel approach. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 164 (2011), 12–20.
4. [4] Szekely, G., Jimenez-Solomon, M.F., Marchetti, P., Kim, J.F., Livingston, A.G., Sustainability assessment of organic solvent nanofiltration: from fabrication to application. Green Chem. 16 (2014), 4440–4473.
5. [5] Zhou, D., Zhu, L., Fu, Y., Zhu, M., Xue, L., Development of lower cost seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration technologies — a review. Desalination 376 (2015), 109–116.
6. [6] Agboola, O., Maree, J., Kolesnikov, A., Mbaya, R., Sadiku, R., Theoretical performance of nanofiltration membranes for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 13 (2015), 37–47.
7. [7] Salehi, F., Current and future applications for nanofiltration technology in the food processing. Food Bioprod. Process. 92 (2014), 161–177.
8. [8] Mahlangu, T.O., Msagati, T.A.M., Hoek, E.M.V., Verliefde, A.R.D., Mamba, B.B., Rejection of pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration (NF) membranes: effect of fouling on rejection behaviour. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 76–78 (2014), 28–34.
9. [9] Jimenez-Solomon, M.F., Song, Q., Jelfs, K.E., Munoz-Ibanez, M., Livingston, A.G., Polymer nanofilms with enhanced microporosity by interfacial polymerization. Nat. Mater., 2016 Advance online publication.
10. [10] Lee, J.-Y., She, Q., Huo, F., Tang, C.Y., Metal–organic framework-based porous matrix membranes for improving mass transfer in forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 492 (2015), 392–399.
11. [11] Campbell, J., Davies, R.P., Braddock, D.C., Livingston, A.G., Improving the permeance of hybrid polymer/metal-organic framework (MOF) membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) – development of MOF thin films via interfacial synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 9668–9674.
12. [12] Campbell, J., Szekely, G., Davies, R.P., Braddock, D.C., Livingston, A.G., Fabrication of hybrid polymer/metal organic framework membranes: mixed matrix membranes versus in situ growth. J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014), 9260–9271.
13. [13] Stavila, V., Talin, A.A., Allendorf, M.D., MOF-based electronic and opto-electronic devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014), 5994–6010.
14. [14] Falcaro, P., Ricco, R., Doherty, C.M., Liang, K., Hill, A.J., Styles, M.J., MOF positioning technology and device fabrication. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014), 5513–5560.
15. [15] Sorribas, S., Gorgojo, P., Téllez, C., Coronas, J., Livingston, A.G., High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal–organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013), 15201–15208.
16. [16] Li, W., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Zhang, G., Metal-organic framework composite membranes: synthesis and separation applications. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015.
17. [17] Sorribas, S., Gorgojo, P., Téllez, C., Coronas, J., Livingston, A.G., High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal-organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013), 15201–15208.
18. [18] Campbell, J., Davies, R.P., Braddock, D.C., Livingston, A.G., Improving the permeance of hybrid polymer/metal-organic framework (MOF) membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)-development of MOF thin films via interfacial synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 9668–9674.
19. [19] Zhu, L., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Shen, J., Xue, L., Gao, C., Van Der Bruggen, B., Mixed matrix membranes containing MIL-53(Al) for potential application in organic solvent nanofiltration. RSC Adv. 5 (2015), 73068–73076.
20. [20] Denny, M.S. Jr., Cohen, S.M., In situ modification of metal-organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54 (2015), 9029–9032.
21. [21] Campbell, J., Székely, G., Davies, R.P., Braddock, D.C., Livingston, A.G., Fabrication of hybrid polymer/metal organic framework membranes: mixed matrix membranes versus in situ growth. J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014), 9260–9271.
22. [22] Campbell, J., Burgal, J.D.S., Szekely, G., Davies, R.P., Braddock, D.C., Livingston, A., Hybrid polymer/MOF membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN): chemical modification and the quest for perfection. J. Membr. Sci. 503 (2016), 166–176.
23. [23] Wang, N., Liu, T., Shen, H., Ji, S., Li, J.R., Zhang, R., Ceramic tubular MOF hybrid membrane fabricated through in situ layer-by-layer self-assembly for nanofiltration. AIChE J. 62 (2016), 538–546.
24. [24] Zhang, R., Ji, S., Wang, N., Wang, L., Zhang, G., Li, J.R., Coordination-driven in situ self-assembly strategy for the preparation of metal-organic framework hybrid membranes. Angew. Chem. – Int. Ed. 53 (2014), 9775–9779.
25. [25] Prince, J.A., Bhuvana, S., Anbharasi, V., Ayyanar, N., Boodhoo, K.V., Singh, G., Self-cleaning metal organic framework (MOF) based ultra filtration membranes-a solution to bio-fouling in membrane separation processes. Sci. Rep., 4, 2014, 6555.
26. [26] Duan, J., Pan, Y., Pacheco, F., Litwiller, E., Lai, Z., Pinnau, I., High-performance polyamide thin-film-nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes containing hydrophobic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Membr. Sci. 476 (2015), 303–310.
27. [27] Wang, H., Wu, C., Wei, Z., Li, C., Liu, Q., Surface chemistry, topology and desalination performance controlled positively charged NF membrane prepared by polydopamine-assisted graft of starburst PAMAM dendrimers. RSC Adv. 6 (2016), 4673–4682.
28. [28] Li, X., Pi, Y., Xia, Q., Li, Z., Xiao, J., TiO2 encapsulated in salicylaldehyde-NH2-MIL-101(Cr) for enhanced visible light-driven photodegradation of MB. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 191 (2016), 192–201.
29. [29] Ma, J., Ying, Y., Guo, X., Huang, H., Liu, D., Zhong, C., Fabrication of mixed-matrix membrane containing metal-organic framework composite with task-specific ionic liquid for efficient CO2separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 4 (2016), 7281–7288.
30. [30] Seoane, B., Téllez, C., Coronas, J., Staudt, C., NH2-MIL-53(Al) and NH2-MIL-101(Al) in sulfur-containing copolyimide mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 111 (2013), 72–81.
31. [31] Serra-Crespo, P., Ramos-Fernandez, E.V., Gascon, J., Kapteijn, F., Synthesis and characterization of an amino functionalized MIL-101(Al): separation and catalytic properties. Chem. Mater. 23 (2011), 2565–2572.
32. [32] Lin, R., Ge, L., Liu, S., Rudolph, V., Zhu, Z., Mixed-matrix membranes with metal–organic framework-decorated CNT fillers for efficient CO2separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015), 14750–14757.
33. [33] Leus, K., Bogaerts, T., De Decker, J., Depauw, H., Hendrickx, K., Vrielinck, H., Van Speybroeck, V., Van Der Voort, P., Systematic study of the chemical and hydrothermal stability of selected “stable” metal organic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 226 (2016), 110–116.
34. [34] Férey, G., Mellot-Draznieks, C., Serre, C., Millange, F., Dutour, J., Surblé, S., Margiolaki, I., A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309 (2005), 2040–2042.
35. [35] Hu, X., Lu, Y., Dai, F., Liu, C., Liu, Y., Host–guest synthesis and encapsulation of phosphotungstic acid in MIL-101 via “bottle around ship”: an effective catalyst for oxidative desulfurization. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 170 (2013), 36–44.
36. [36] Ramos-Fernandez, E.V., Pieters, C., van der Linden, B., Juan-Alcañiz, J., Serra-Crespo, P., Verhoeven, M.W.G.M., Niemantsverdriet, H., Gascon, J., Kapteijn, F., Highly dispersed platinum in metal organic framework NH2-MIL-101(Al) containing phosphotungstic acid – characterization and catalytic performance. J. Catal. 289 (2012), 42–52.
37. [37] Jiang, D., Keenan, L.L., Burrows, A.D., Edler, K.J., Synthesis and post-synthetic modification of MIL-101(Cr)-NH2via a tandem diazotisation process. Chem. Commun. 48 (2012), 12053–12055.
38. [38] Tang, C.Y., Kwon, Y.-N., Leckie, J.O., Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 290 (2007), 86–94.
39. [39] Bai, Z.-Q., Yuan, L.-Y., Zhu, L., Liu, Z.-R., Chu, S.-Q., Zheng, L.-R., Zhang, J., Chai, Z.-F., Shi, W.-Q., Introduction of amino groups into acid-resistant MOFs for enhanced U(vi) sorption. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 525–534.
40. [40] Gascon, J., Aktay, U., Hernandez-Alonso, M.D., van Klink, G.P.M., Kapteijn, F., Amino-based metal-organic frameworks as stable, highly active basic catalysts. J. Catal. 261 (2009), 75–87.
41. [41] A.G. Fane, C.Y. Tang, R. Wang, 4.11 – Membrane technology for water: microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis A2 – Wilderer, Peter, in: Treatise on Water Science, Elsevier, Oxford, 2011, pp. 301–335.
42. [42] Fadzallah, I.A., Majid, S.R., Careem, M.A., Arof, A.K., A study on ionic interactions in chitosan–oxalic acid polymer electrolyte membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 463 (2014), 65–72.
43. [43] Pawlicka, A., Danczuk, M., Wieczorek, W., Zygadło-Monikowska, E., Influence of plasticizer type on the properties of polymer electrolytes based on chitosan. J. Phys. Chem. A 112 (2008), 8888–8895.
44. [44] Liu, Y., Yu, S., Wu, H., Li, Y., Wang, S., Tian, Z., Jiang, Z., High permeability hydrogel membranes of chitosan/poly ether-block-amide blends for CO2separation. J. Membr. Sci. 469 (2014), 198–208.
45. [45] Miao, J., Lin, H., Wang, W., Zhang, L.-C., Amphoteric composite membranes for nanofiltration prepared from sulfated chitosan crosslinked with hexamethylene diisocyanate. Chem. Eng. J. 234 (2013), 132–139.
46. [46] Premakshi, H.G., Sajjan, A.M., Kariduraganavar, M.Y., Development of pervaporation membranes using chitosan and titanium glycine-N,N-dimethylphosphonate for dehydration of isopropanol. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 3952–3961.
47. [47] Chaudhary, J.P., Vadodariya, N., Nataraj, S.K., Meena, R., Chitosan-based aerogel membrane for robust oil-in-water emulsion separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015), 24957–24962.
48. [48] Ji, Y.-L., An, Q.-F., Zhao, F.-Y., Gao, C.-J., Fabrication of chitosan/PDMCHEA blend positively charged membranes with improved mechanical properties and high nanofiltration performances. Desalination 357 (2015), 8–15.
49. [49] Zhong, P.S., Widjojo, N., Chung, T.-S., Weber, M., Maletzko, C., Positively charged nanofiltration (NF) membranes via UV grafting on sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) for effective removal of textile dyes from wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 417–418 (2012), 52–60.