Hybrid polymer/MOF membranes for Organic Solvent Nanofiltration (OSN): Chemical modification and the quest for perfection

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 503, Issue , 2016, Pages 166-176

  Campbell, James ^a   Burgal, Joao Da Silvao ^a   Szekely, Gyorgy ^a   Davies, R P ^a   Braddock, D Christopher ^a   Livingston, Andrew ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical modification; Hybrid membranes; Metal Organic Frameworks; Modelling; Organic Solvent Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; ORGANOMETALLICS; POLYIMIDES; POLYMERS; PORE SIZE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOLVENTS;

ARYL CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CHEMICALLY MODIFIED; HYBRID MEMBRANE; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION (OSN); POLYIMIDE MEMBRANES; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

MEMBRANES;

ACETONE; CARBOXYLIC ACID; COPPER; DIOXANE; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; ORGANIC SOLVENT; POLYIMIDE; POLYMER; POLYSTYRENE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE FORMATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; STEADY STATE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; THICKNESS; ULTRAFILTRATION; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84992374696     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Marchetti P., Solomon M.F.J., Szekely G., Livingston A.G. Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. Chem. Rev. 2014.
2. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
3. Hołda A.K., Vankelecom I.F.J. Understanding and guiding the phase inversion process for synthesis of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132:42130.
4. See-Toh Y.H., Silva M., Livingston A. Controlling molecular weight cut-off curves for highly solvent stable organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:220-232.
5. 2] mixed-matrix membranes for gas separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362:478-487.
6. 2 binary gas mixture separations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81:31-40.
7. Aroon M.A., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T., Montazer-Rahmati M.M. Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:229-242.
8. 2 MOF and polyimide for gas separation and adsorption. Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2010, 49:12605-12612.
9. Perez E.V., Balkus K.J., Ferraris J.P., Musselman I.H. Mixed-matrix membranes containing MOF-5 for gas separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 328:165-173.
10. Zhang Y., Musselman I.H., Ferraris J.P., Balkus K.J. Gas permeability properties of Matrimid® membranes containing the metal-organic framework Cu-BPY-HFS. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:170-181.
11. Car A., Stropnik C., Peinemann K.-V. Hybrid membrane materials with different metal-organicframeworks (MOFs) for gas separation. Desalination 2006, 200:424-426.
12. Adams R., Carson C., Ward J., Tannenbaum R., Koros W. Metal organic framework mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 131:13-20.
13. Basu S., Maes M., Cano-Odena A., Alaerts L., Vos D.E.D., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent resistant nanofiltration (SRNF) membranes based on metal-organic frameworks. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 344:190-198.
14. Campbell J., Szekely G., Davies R.P., Braddock D.C., Livingston A.G. Fabrication of hybrid polymer/metal organic framework membranes: mixed matrix membranes versus in situ growth. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2:9260-9271.
15. Ge L., Zhou W., Du A., Zhu Z. Porous polyethersulfone-supported zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes for hydrogen separation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116:13264-13270.
16. Nagaraju D., Bhagat D.G., Banerjee R., Kharul U.K. In situ growth of metal-organic frameworks on a porous ultrafiltration membrane for gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1.
17. Cacho-Bailo F., Seoane B., Téllez C., Coronas J. ZIF-8 continuous membrane on porous polysulfone for hydrogen separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 464:119-126.
18. Vankelecom I.F.J., broeck S.Vd, Merckx E., Geerts Hilde, Grobet P., Uytterhoeven J.B. Silylation to improve incorporation of zeolites in polyimide films. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100:3753-3758.
19. 4 separation. RSC Adv. 2013, 3:24266-24279.
20. Siddique H., Rundquist E., Bhole Y., Peeva L.G., Livingston A.G. Mixed matrix membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:354-366.
21. Galvin C.J., Genzer J. Applications of surface-grafted macromolecules derived from post-polymerization modification reactions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37:871-906.
22. Tempelaar S., Mespouille L., Coulembier O., Dubois P., Dove A.P. Synthesis and post-polymerisation modifications of aliphatic poly(carbonate)s prepared by ring-opening polymerisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:1312-1336.
23. Szekely G., Valtcheva I.B., Kim J.F., Livingston A.G. Molecularly imprinted organic solvent nanofiltration membranes - revealing molecular recognition and solute rejection behaviour. React. Funct. Polym. 2015, 86:215-224.
24. Günay K.A., Theato P., Klok H.-A. Standing on the shoulders of Hermann Staudinger: post-polymerization modification from past to present. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2012, 51:1-28.
25. See-Toh Y.H., Limb F.W., Livingston A.G. Polymeric membranes for nanofiltration in polar aprotic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 3-10.
26. Khulbe K.C., Feng C.Y., Matsuura T. Pore size, pore size distribution, and roughness at the membrane surface. Synthetic Polymeric Membranes 2008, 101-139. Springer Laboratory, Berlin.
27. Hassan A.R., Munaim M.S.A. Fabrication and characterization of integrally skinned-oriented highly selective charged asymmetric low pressure poly(ether sulfone) membranes for nanofiltration. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 87:559-569.
28. Stawikowska J., Kim J.F., Livingston A.G. Pore-flow calculations based on pore size distributions in polyimide membranes determined by a nanoprobe imaging technique. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 97:81-95.
29. Chaudhary D., Went M.R., Nakagawa K., Buckman S.J., Sullivan J.P. Molecular pore size characterization within chitosan biopolymer using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64:2635-2637.
30. Itoh Y., Shimazu A., Sadzuka Y., Sonobe T., Itai S. Novel method for stratum corneum pore size determination using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 358:91-95.
31. Stawikowska J., Livingston A.G. Nanoprobe imaging molecular scale pores in polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413-414:1-16.
32. Valtcheva I.B., Kumbharkar S.C., Kim J.F., Bhole Y., Livingston A.G. Beyond polyimide: crosslinked polybenzimidazole membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) in harsh environments. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 457:62-72.
33. Solomon M.F.J., Bhole Y., Livingston A.G. High flux membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration(OSN)-interfacial polymerization with solvent activation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423-424:371-382.
34. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling of membrane nanofiltration-pore size distribution effects. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1393-1407.
35. Belfort G., Pimbley J.M., Greiner A., Chung K.Y. Diagnosis of membrane fouling using a rotating annular filter. 1. Cell culture media. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 77:1-22.
36. Zydney A.L., Aimar P., Meireles M., Pimbley J.M., Belfort G. Use of the log-normal probability density function to analyze membrane pore size distributions: functional forms and discrepancies. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 91:293-298.
37. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
38. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination 2002, 147:197-203.
39. Silva P., Livingston A.G. Effect of solute concentration and mass transfer limitations on transport in organic solvent nanofiltration-partially rejected solute. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:889-898.
40. Santos J.L.C., de Beukelaar P., Vankelecom I.F.J., Velizarov S., Crespo J.G. Effect of solute geometry and orientation on the rejection of uncharged compounds by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50:122-131.
41. Otero J.A., Mazarrasa O., Villasante J., Silva V., Prádanos P., Calvo J.I., Hernández A. Three independent ways to obtain information on pore size distributions of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309:17-27.
42. Deen W.M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 1987, 33:1409-1425.
43. Bowen W.R., Sharif A.O. Transport through microfiltration membranes-particle hydrodynamics and flux reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1994, 168:414-421.
44. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
45. Wilke C.R., Chang P. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. AIChE J. 1955, 1:264-270.
46. Zhao Y.H., Abraham M.H., Zissimos A.M. Fast calculation of van der Waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68:7368-7373.
47. 2 metal-organic framework. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3:1847-1850.
48. Campbell J., Davies R.P., Braddock D.C., Livingston A.G. Improving the permeance of hybrid polymer/metal organic framework (MOF) membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) - development of MOF thin films via interfacial synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3:9668-9674.
49. Toh Y.H.S., Loh X.X., Li K., Bismarck A., Livingston A.G. In search of a standard method for the characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291:120-125.
50. Silva P., Han S., Livingston A.G. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2005, 262:49-59.