Modelling the history of ideas

British Journal for the History of Philosophy

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 812-835

  Betti, Arianna ^a   Van Den Berg, Hein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

concept drift; history of ideas; history of scientific methodology; Kuukkanen; Lovejoy; Methodology of the history of philosophy; models; schemata

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027937040     PISSN: 09608788     EISSN: 14693526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2014.949217     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Anderson, H. Kuhn's Account of Family Resemblance: A Solution to the Problem of Wide-Open Texture. Erkenntnis 52, no. 3 (2000): 313-37. doi: 10.1023/A:1005546300818
2. Anderson, R. C. The Notion of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise: General Discussion of the Conference. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, edited by R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague., 415-31. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
3. Beth, E. W. The Foundations of Mathematics: A Study in the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1965.
4. Betti, A. On Haslanger's Focal Analysis of Race and Gender in Resisting Reality as an Interpretive Model. Krisis 1 (2014): 13-18. http://j.mp/betti2014
5. Bevir, M. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
6. Bolzano, B. Wissenschaftslehre: Versuch einer ausführlichen und größtentheils neuen Darstellung der Logik mit steten Rücksicht auf deren bisherige Bearbeiter, Zweiter Band. Sulzbach: Seidel, 1837.
7. Bredsdorff, T. Lovejoy's Idea of "Idea". New Literary History 8, no. 2 (1977): 195-211. doi: 10.2307/468517
8. Decock, L., and, I. Douven. Similarity after Goodman. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2, no. 1 (2011): 61-75. doi: 10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y
9. Gracia, J. J. E. Philosophy and Its History. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
10. Gram, M. S., and, R. M. Martin. The Perils of Plenitude: Hintikka Contra Lovejoy. Journal of the History of Ideas 41, no. 3 (1980): 497-511. doi: 10.2307/2709409
11. Hintikka, J. Gaps in the Great Chain of Being: An Exercise in the Methodology of the History of Ideas. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 49 (1975-1976): 22-38. doi: 10.2307/3129989
12. Husserl, E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erste Teil: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik [1901, 2nd rev. ed. 1913]. Translated and edited by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 1973.
13. de Jong, W. R. Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity, and the Aristotelian Model of Science. Kant-Studien 92, no. 3 (2001): 328-49. doi: 10.1515/kant.92.3.328
14. de Jong, W. R. The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege. Synthese 174, no. 2 (2010): 237-61. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9420-9
15. de Jong, W. R., and, A. Betti. The Classical Model of Science: A Millennia Old Model of Scientific Rationality. Synthese 174, no. 2 (2010): 185-203. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9417-4
16. Knight, C. Unit-Ideas Unleashed: A Reinterpretation and Reassessment of Lovejovian Methodology in the History of Ideas. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6, no. 2 (2012): 195-217. doi: 10.1163/187226312X650746
17. Kuukkanen, J.-M. Making Sense of Conceptual Change. History and Theory 47, no. 3 (2008): 351-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00459.x
18. Kvastad, N. B. On Method in the History of Ideas. International Logic Review 9, no. 17-18 (1978): 96-111.
19. Lorenz, C. De Constructie van het Verleden: een inleiding in de theorie van de geschiedenis. 4th rev ed. Amsterdam: Boom, 1994.
20. Lovejoy, A. O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.
21. Lovejoy, A. O. The Historiography of Ideas. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78, no. 4 (1938): 529-43.
22. Lovejoy, A. O. Reflections on the History of Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 1, no. 1 (1940): 3-23. doi: 10.2307/2707007
23. Lovejoy, A. O. Reply to Professor Spitzer. Journal of the History of Ideas 5, no. 2 (1944): 204-19. doi: 10.2307/2707385
24. Mendelbaum, M. The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy. History and Theory 5, no. 5 (1965): 33-66. doi: 10.2307/2504118
25. Mink, L. O. Change and Causality in the History of Ideas. Eighteenth-Century Studies 2, no. 1 (1968): 7-25. doi: 10.2307/2737650
26. Richards, R. J. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
27. Rumelhart, D. E. Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education, edited by R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer., 33-58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., and, D. A. Norman. Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning. In Semantic Factors in Cognition, edited by J. W. Cotton and R. Klatzky., 37-53. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
29. Rumelhart, D. E., and, A. Ortony. The Representation of Knowledge in Memory. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, edited by R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague., 99-135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
30. Scholz, H. Die Axiomatik der Alten. Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 4 ( 1930): 259-78.
31. Skinner, Q. Visions of Politics. Vol. I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
32. Spitzer, L. Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Applied to Hitlerism. Journal of the History of Ideas 5, no. 2 (1944): 191-203. doi: 10.2307/2707384
33. Wang, S., S. Schlobach, and, M. Klein. Concept Drift and How to Identify It. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9, no. 3 (2011): 247-65. doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2011.05.003
34. Wilson, D. J. Lovejoy's The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years. Journal of the History of Ideas 48, no. 2 (1987): 187-206. doi: 10.2307/2709553
35. Zammito, J. Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant's Relevance for Contemporary Controversies over Function in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37, no. 4 (2006): 748-70. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.008