Research incentive program for clinical surgical faculty associated with increases in research productivity

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 144, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1003-1009

  Schroen, Anneke T ^a   Thielen, Monika J ^a   Turrentine, Florence E ^a   Kron, Irving L ^a   Slingluff, Craig L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUNDING; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MALE; MEDLINE; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION; WEB OF SCIENCE; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EFFICIENCY; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MOTIVATION; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SPEECH; TIME FACTORS; VIRGINIA;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 85027934169     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.033     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andreae, M.C., Blad, K., Cabana, M.D., Physician compensation programs in academic medical centers. Health Care Manage Rev 31 (2006), 251–258.
2. Emery, S.E., Gregory, C., Physician incentives for academic productivity—an analysis of orthopaedic department compensation strategies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88A (2006), 2049–2056.
3. Williams, R.G., Dunnington, G.L., Folse, J.R., The impact of a program for systematically recognizing and rewarding academic performance. Acad Med 78 (2003), 156–166.
4. Weigel, R.J., Dracon, G., Radhakrishnan, R., Rho, Y., Sevgen, F., Dafoe, D.C., Incentive systems for academic productivity in a department of surgery. J Am Coll Surg 199 (2004), 300–307.
5. Detsky, A.S., Baker, M.A., How to run a successful academic practice plan. JAMA 298 (2007), 799–801.
6. Bland, C.J., Ruffin, M.T., Characteristics of a productive research environment—literature review. Acad Med 67 (1992), 385–397.
7. Iyengar, R., Wang, Y., Chow, J., Charney, D.S., An integrated approach to evaluate faculty members’ research performance. Acad Med 84 (2009), 1610–1616.
8. Cramer, J.S., Ramalingam, S., Rosenthal, T.C., Fox, C.H., Implementing a comprehensive relative value-based incentive plan in an academic family medicine department. Acad Med 75 (2000), 1159–1166.
9. Guss, D., A simple plan—faculty compensation in an academic department of emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 9 (2002), 654–657.
10. Tarquinio, G.T., Dittus, R.S., Byrne, D.W., Kaiser, A., Neilson, E.G., Executive Committee of the Department of Medicine. Effects of performance-based compensation and faculty track on the clinical activity, research portfolio, and teaching mission of a large academic department of medicine. Acad Med 78 (2003), 690–701.
11. Brandt, T.L., Romme, C.R., LaRusso, N.F., Lindor, K.D., A novel incentive system for faculty in an academic medical center. Ann Intern Med 137 (2002), 738–743.
12. Hilton, C., Fisher, W., Lopez, A., Sanders, C., A relative value-based system for calculating faculty productivity in teaching, research, administration, and patient care. Acad Med 72 (1997), 787–793.
13. Curtis, W.F., Hunter, J.G., What the impact factor means for surgery journals. World J Surg 30 (2006), 1368–1370.
14. Allen, L., Jones, C., Dolby, K., Lynn, D., Walport, M., Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PlosOne, 4, 2009, e5910.
15. Joiner, K.A., Evaluating faculty productivity in research: an interesting approach, but questions remain. Acad Med 84 (2009), 1482–1484.
16. Ko, C., Whang, E., Longmire, W., McFadden, D., Improving the surgeon's participation in research: is it a problem of training or priority?. J Surg Res 91 (2000), 5–8.