Spatial quantification of the world population potentially exposed to Zika virus

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 966-975

  Alaniz, Alberto J ^a   Bacigalupo, Antonella ^a   Cattan, Pedro E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Exposure level; Vector niche modelling; Vectorial transmission; Viral contagion risk; ZIKV

Indexed keywords

DISEASE VECTOR; HEALTH RISK; MOSQUITO; NICHE; PARASITE TRANSMISSION; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VIRUS; ZIKA VIRUS DISEASE;

AEDES AEGYPTI; AFRICA; ARTICLE; ASIA; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN; CENTRAL AFRICA; CENTRAL AMERICA; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INDIAN OCEAN; INFECTION RISK; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC ISLANDS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUTH AFRICA; SOUTH AMERICA; VERTICAL TRANSMISSION; VIRUS TRANSMISSION; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; ZIKA FEVER; ZIKA VIRUS; AEDES; ANIMAL; GLOBAL HEALTH; GRAVITY MODEL; MOSQUITO VECTOR; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSMISSION; VIROLOGY;

ASIA; ATLANTIC COAST [SOUTH AMERICA]; ATLANTIC OCEAN; AUSTRALASIA; CARIBBEAN SEA; CENTRAL AFRICA; CENTRAL AMERICA; INDIAN OCEAN; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; SOUTH AFRICA;

AEDES AEGYPTI; FLAVIVIRIDAE; ZIKA VIRUS;

AEDES; ANIMALS; GLOBAL HEALTH; HUMANS; MODELS, SPATIAL INTERACTION; MOSQUITO VECTORS; POPULATION DENSITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ZIKA VIRUS; ZIKA VIRUS INFECTION;

EID: 85027689309     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw366     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Vorou R. Zika virus, vectors, reservoirs, amplifying hosts, and their potential to spread worldwide: what we know and what we should investigate urgently. Int J Infect Dis 2016;48:85-90.
2. Hayes EB. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:1347-50.
3. Wong PSJ, Li M, Zhi I et al. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse): a potential vector of Zika virus in Singapore. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:1-5.
4. Marcondes CB, Ximenes M deFF de M. Zika virus in Brazil and the danger of infestation by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015;49:4-10.
5. Faye O, Diallo D, DialloMet al. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of Zika virus and evaluation with field-caught mosquitoes. Virol J 2013;10:311.
6. Faye O, Freire CCM, Iamarino A et al. Molecular evolution of Zika virus during its emergence in the 20th century. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;8:36.
7. Diallo D, Sall AA, Diagne CTet al. Zika virus emergence in mosquitoes in Southeastern Senegal, 2011. PLoS ONE 2014;9:4-11.
8. Kim E, Tm S, Myco RGM. Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:1090.
9. Musso D, Roche C, Robin E et al. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:359-61.
10. Rodriguez-Morales AJ. Dengue and Chikungunya were not enough: now also Zika arrived. iMedPub Journals-Archivos Med 2015;11:1-4.
11. Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Foy JLC et al. Probable non-vectorborne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:880-2.
12. Li M, Wong PSJ, Ng LC et al. Oral susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012;6:e1792.
13. Besnard M, Lastère S, Teissier A et al. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill 2014;19:pii=20751.
14. Musso D, Nhan T, Robin E et al. Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014. Euro Surveill 2014;19:pii=20761.
15. Mansuy JM, Dutertre M, Mengelle C et al. Zika virus: high infectious viral load in semen, a new sexually transmitted pathogen?. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:405.
16. Hazin AN, Poretti A, Di Carvalcanti D et al. Computed tomographic findings in microcephaly associated with Zika virus. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1-3.
17. World Health Organization. Zika virus. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/(5 February 2016, date last accessed).
18. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016;374:951-8.
19. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R et al. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: Tip of the iceberg?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:6-7.
20. Kraemer MUG, Sinka M, Duda KA et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. Albopictus. eLife 2015;4:1-18.
21. Messina JP, Kraemer MUG, Brady O et al. Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus. eLife 2016;5:e15272.
22. Alsan MM, Westerhaus M, HerceMet al. Poverty, global health and infectious disease: lessons from Haiti and Rwanda. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011;25:611-22.
23. Xia S, Allotey P, Reidpath DD et al. Combating infectious diseases of poverty: a year on. Infect Dis Poverty 2013;2:27.
24. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire SP. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 2006;190:231-59.
25. Phillips SJ, Dudik M, Schapire RE. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, 2004, pp. 655-62.
26. Global Biodiversity Information Facility-GBIF.org GBIF Occurrence. http://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vij0ap (24 May 2016, date last accessed).
27. Foley DH, Wilkerson RC, Birney I et al. MosquitoMap and the Mal-area calculator: new web tools to relate mosquito species distribution with vector borne disease. Int J Health Geogr 2010;9:1-8.
28. Royston P. An extension of Shapiro and Wilks's W test for normality to large samples. J Appl Statist 1982;31:115-24.
29. Royston P. A simple method for evaluating the Shapiro-Francia W' test of non-normality. Statistician 1983;32:297-300.
30. Bradley C. The absolute correlation coefficient. Math Gazette 1985;69:12-17.
31. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Density Grids. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v3-population-density/data-download 2005 (25 January 2017, date last accessed).
32. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); the World Bank; and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Global Rural-UrbanMapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1): Population Count Grid. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/grump-v1-popu lation-count 2011 (25 January 2017, date last accessed).
33. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol 2008;45:1372-81.
34. FerrazKMPM de B, FerrazSF de B, de Paula RC et al. Species distribution modeling for conservation purposes. Nat a Conserv 2012;10:214-20.
35. Zhang M-G, Zhou Z-K, Chen W-Y et al. Using species distribution modeling to improve conservation and land use planning of Yunnan, China. Biol Conserv 2012;153:257-64.
36. Pyke CR, Andelman SJ, Midgley G. Identifying priority areas for bioclimatic representation under climate change: a case study for Proteaceae in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 2005;125:1-9.
37. Franklin J. Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges. Divers Distrib 2013;19: 1217-23.
38. Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S. The art of modelling rangeshifting species. Methods Ecol Evol 2010;1:330-42.
39. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL et al. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 2006;29:773-85.
40. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J et al. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib 2008;14:763-73.
41. Larson SR, DeGroote JP, Bartholomay LC et al. Ecological niche modeling of potential West Nile virus vector mosquito species in Iowa. J Insect Sci 2010;10:110.
42. Rapacciuolo G, Roy DB, Gillings S et al. Climatic associations of British species distributions show good transferability in time but low predictive accuracy for range change. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e40212.
43. Illoldi-Rangel P, Rivaldi C, Sissel B et al. Species distribution models and ecological suitability analysis for potential tick vectors of Lyme disease in Mexico. J Trop Med 2012;2012:959101.
44. Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Carvalheiro LG, Polce C et al. Fit-for-purpose: species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria-Dutch hoverflies as a case study. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e63708.
45. Dicko AH, Lancelot R, Seck MTet al. Using species distribution models to optimize vector control in the framework of the tsetse eradication campaign in Senegal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:10149-54.
46. Conley AK, Fuller DO, Haddad N et al. Modeling the distribution of the West Nile and Rift Valley Fever vector Culex pipiens in arid and semi-arid regions of the Middle East and North Africa. Parasit Vectors 2014;7:289.
47. Pearson RG, Dawson TP. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2003;12:361-71.
48. Costa EAP de A, Santos EM de M, Correia JC et al. Impact of small variations in temperature and humidity on the reproductive activity and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev Bras Entomol 2010;54:488-93.
49. Vries P. Modelling malaria risk: an individual based and spatial explicit approach. Workshop on Spatial Aspects of Demography: 1-14. http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/work shops/010516_paper04.pdf. 2001 (25 January 2017, date last accessed).
50. UN, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. Note: 1950-2010 are estimates and from 2011-2100 are projected populations in the medium-fertility variant. 2013.
51. Wongkoon S, JaroensutasineeM, Jaroensutasinee K. Distribution, seasonal variation & dengue transmission prediction in Sisaket, Thailand. Indian JMed Res 2013;138:347-53.
52. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (2016) All Countries & Territories with Active Zika Virus Transmission. http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/active-countries.html (16 January 2017, date last accessed).
53. ISPCH. Resultados de diagnóstico y confirmación de Culícidos. Chile, 2010-2016. Boletín 2016;6: 1-11. http://www.ispch.cl/sites/default/files/BoletinCulicidos-04052016C.pdf (16 January 2017, date last accessed).