Semiotics and citations

Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 72-92

  Wouters, Paul ^a,b,c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c Dutch national Graduate School Science   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027565713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110308464-007     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Berg, M., & Mol, A. (1998). Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, and Bodies. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
3. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
4. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham, 1984, 1.
5. Cronin, B. (2000). Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 440-453.
6. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2013). Constitutive Effects of Performance Indicators: Getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review, 16(7), 969-986.
7. Day, R. E. (2005). Poststructuralism and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 575-609.
8. Day, R. E. (2014). “The Data-It Is Me!"(“Les données-c’est Moi!"). Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact, 67.
9. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press.
10. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science.
11. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International journal of epidemiology, 35(5), 1123-1127.
12. Gluck, M. (1997, August). Making sense of semiotics: privileging respondents in revealing contextual geographic syntactic and semantic codes. In Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context(pp. 53-66). Taylor Graham Publishing.
13. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
14. Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261.
15. Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American ethnologist, 16(2), 248-267.
16. James, W. (1898). Philosophical conceptions and practical results. The University Press.
17. Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23(3), 409-425.
18. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
19. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
20. Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
21. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
22. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
23. Lenoir, T., & Ross, C. (1996). “The Naturalized History Museum.” In The Disunity of Science:Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press:,370-97.
24. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation?. Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
25. Luukkonen, T. (1997). Why has Latour’s theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38(1), 27-37.
26. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444.
27. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2009). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1-12.
28. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
29. Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (pp. 206-219). Washington, D. C: Computer Horizons.
30. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual review of information science and technology, 41(1), 609-641.
31. Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2008). The reference return ratio. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 128-135.
32. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
33. Small, H. G. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social studies of science, 139-166.
34. van Raan, A. F. (1998). In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much. Scientometrics, 43(1), 129-139.
35. Walker, J. A. (2014). Comments on Umberto Eco’s Book “A Theory of Semiotics”. Leonardo, 317-319.
36. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699-716.
37. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
38. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Wouters, P. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 635-641.
39. Wouters, P. (1998). The signs of science. Scientometrics, 41(1), 225-241.
40. Wouters, P. (1999). The citation culture.
41. Wouters, P. (2014). The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact, 47.
42. Wyatt, S., Milojević, S., Lucio-Arias, D., Park, H.W., Šabanović, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Quantitative and Qualitative STS: The Intellectual and Practical Contributions of Scientometrics. Available at SSRN 2588336.