Improving risk factor management for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of healthcare interventions in primary care and community settings

BMJ Open

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Murphy, Mark E ^a   Byrne, Molly ^b   Galvin, Rose ^c   Boland, Fiona ^a   Fahey, Tom ^a   Smith, Susan M ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

diabetes endocrinology; organisation of health services; primary care

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; COMMUNITY CARE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; META ANALYSIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK FACTOR; RISK MANAGEMENT; SHORT FORM 12; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH PROMOTION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN A; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85027284641     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015135     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047-53.
2. Spann SJ, Nutting PA, Galliher JM, et al. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 23-31.
3. Campbell DJ, McGrady M, Prior DL, et al. Most individuals with treated blood pressures above target receive only one or two antihypertensive drug classes. Intern Med J 2013; 43: 137-43
4. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.bmj 2000; 321: 405-12.
5. Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10: E26.
6. Mays N. Reducing unwarranted variations in healthcare in the English NHS.bmj 2011; 342: d1849.
7. Simmons RK, Carlsen AH, Griffin SJ, et al. Variation in prescribing of lipid-lowering medication in primary care is associated with incidence of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in people with screen-detected diabetes: findings from the ADDITIONDenmark trial. Diabet Med 2014; 31: 1577-85.
8. Seitz P, Rosemann T, Gensichen J, et al. Interventions in primary care to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13: 479-89.
9. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1821-33.
10. Seidu S, Walker NS, Bodicoat DH, et al A systematic review of interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on cardio-metabolic risk factor control in people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016; 113: 1-13.
11. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, et al. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Lancet 2012; 379: 2252-61.
12. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560-72.
13. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2545-59.
14. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 129-39.
15. Turnbull FM, Abraira C, Anderson RJ, et al. Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 2288-98.
16. Skyler JS, Bergenstal R, Bonow RO, et al. Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA Diabetes Trials: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a Scientific Statement of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 298-304.
17. Hayward RA, Reaven PD, Wiitala WL, et al. Follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2197-206.
18. Hayward RA. Excessive testing of adults with type 2 diabetes.bmj 2015; 351: h6549.
19. Mossello E. Targeting vascular risk factors in older adults: from Polypill to Personalized Prevention. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 1949-50.
20. Murphy M, Galvin R, Fahey T, et al. Effectiveness of interventions in primary care to improve glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factor levels in patients with poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. PROSPERO 2014. CRD42014014442.
21. Effective practice and Organisation of Care. EPOC Intervention types. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2015.accessed on 13 April 2016. https://.epoc. cochrane.org/.sites/.epoc. cochrane.org/.files/.uploads/.EPOC
22. Keogh KM, Smith SM, White P, et al. Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17: 105-13.
23. Krein SL, Klamerus ML, Vijan S, et al. Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial. Am J Med 2004; 116: 732-9.
24. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson Hohne S, Hohne SH, et al. Webbased care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1624-9.
25. Vanselow NA A New Definition of Primary Care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1995; 273: 192.
26. Effective practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). Summary assessments of the risk of Bias. EPOC Resources for review authors Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services 20132016 http://.epoc. cochrane.org/.sites/.epoc. cochrane.org/.files/uploads/.16.
27. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp, 2013. LP.
28. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-58.
29. Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1559-73.
30. Thom DH, Ghorob A, Hessler D, et al. Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11: 137-44.
31. Taylor CB, Miller NH, Reilly KR, et al. Evaluation of a nursecare management system to improve outcomes in patients with complicated diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1058-63.
32. Tang PC, Overhage JM, Chan AS, et al. Online disease management of diabetes: engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20: 526-34.
33. Sen AP, Sewell TB, Riley EB, et al. Financial incentives for homebased health monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29: 770-7.
34. Schillinger D, Handley M, Wang F, et al. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-Arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 559-66.
35. Rothman RL, Malone R, Bryant B, et al A randomized trial of a primary care-based disease management program to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with diabetes. Am J Med 2005; 118: 276-84.
36. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, et al. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1934-42.
37. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, et al A structured selfmonitoring of blood glucose approach in type 2 diabetes encourages more frequent, intensive, and effective physician interventions: results from the STeP study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13: 797-802.
38. Philis-Tsimikas A, Fortmann A, Lleva-Ocana L, et al. Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches: a project Dulce Promotora randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1926-31.
39. Palmas W, Findley SE, Mejia M, et al. Results of the Northern Manhattan Diabetes community outreach project: a Randomized trial studying a community health worker intervention to improve diabetes care in Hispanic adults. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 963-9.
40. Odegard PS, Goo A, Hummel J, et al. Caring for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus: a randomized pharmacist intervention. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 433-40.
41. Mons U, Raum E, Krämer HU, et al. Effectiveness of a Supportive Telephone counseling intervention in type 2 Diabetes Patients: randomized Controlled Study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e77954.
42. Mathers N, Ng CJ, Campbell MJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness of a patient decision aid to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PANDAs) in general practice.bmj Open 2012; 2: e001469.
43. Maislos M, Weisman D. Multidisciplinary approach to patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized study.acta Diabetol 2004; 41: 44-8.
44. Long JA, Jahnle EC, Richardson DM, et al. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in african American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 416-24.
45. Kim MT, Han HR, Song HJ, et al A community-based, culturally tailored behavioral intervention for korean Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2009; 35: 986-94.
46. Jovanovic L. California Medi-Cal Type 2 Diabetes Study Group. Closing the gap: effect of diabetes case management on glycemic control among low-income ethnic minority populations: the California Medi-Cal type 2 diabetes study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 95-103.
47. Jameson JP, Baty PJ. Pharmacist collaborative management of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16: 250-5.
48. Jacobs M, Sherry PS, Taylor LM, et al. Pharmacist Assisted Medication Program enhancing the regulation of Diabetes (PAMPERED) study. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2012; 52: 613-21.
49. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, et al. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 507-15.
50. Guerci B, Drouin P, Grangé V, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance intervention active (ASIA) study. Diabetes Metab 2003; 29: 587-94.
51. Frosch DL. Evaluation of a Behavior Support Intervention for Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 2011-7.
52. Forjuoh SN, Bolin JN, Huber JC, et al. Behavioral and technological interventions targeting glycemic control in a racially/ethnically diverse population: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 71.
53. Farmer A, Hardeman W, Hughes D, et al. An explanatory randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led, consultation-based intervention to support patients with adherence to taking glucose lowering medication for type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 30.
54. Edelman D, Fredrickson SK, Melnyk SD, et al. Medical clinics versus usual care for patients with both diabetes and hypertension: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 689-96.
55. DePue JD, Dunsiger S, Seiden AD, et al. Nurse-community health worker team improves diabetes care in American Samoa: results of a randomized Controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 1947-53.
56. Dale J, Caramlau I, Sturt J, et al. Telephone peer-delivered intervention for diabetes motivation and support: the telecare Exploratory RCT. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75: 91-8.
57. Choe HM, Mitrovich S, Dubay D, et al. Proactive case management of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by a clinical pharmacist: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care 2005; 11: 253-60.
58. Blackberry ID, Furler JS, Best JD, et al. Effectiveness of general practice based, practice nurse led telephone coaching on glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes: the patient engagement and coaching for Health (PEACH) pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.bmj 2013; 347: f5272.
59. Crowley MJ, Edelman D, McAndrew AT, et al. Effectiveness of a scalable telemedicine intervention for veterans with persistent poor diabetes control. Diabetes 2015; 64: A80.
60. Edelman D, Dolor RJ, Coffman CJ, et al. Nurse-led behavioral management of diabetes and hypertension in community practices: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30: 626-33.
61. Capozza K, Woolsey S, Georgsson M, et al. Going mobile with diabetes support: a randomized study of a text message-based personalized behavioral intervention for type 2 diabetes self-care. Diabetes Spectr 2015; 28: 83-91.
62. McDermott RA, Schmidt B, Preece C, et al.community health workers improve diabetes care in remote Australian Indigenous communities: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 68.
63. OConnor PJ, Schmittdiel JA, Pathak RD, et al. Randomized trial of telephone outreach to improve medication adherence and metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 3317-24.
64. Sugiyama T, Steers WN, Wenger NS, et al. Effect of a communitybased diabetes self-management empowerment program on mental health-related quality of life: a causal mediation analysis from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 115.
65. Anzaldo-Campos MC, Contreras S, Vargas-Ojeda A, et al. Dulce Wireless Tijuana: a Randomized Control Trial evaluating the impact of Project Dulce and Short-Term Mobile Technology on Glycemic Control in a Family Medicine Clinic in Northern Mexico. Diabetes Technol Ther 2016; 18: 240-51.
66. Basudev N, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Thomas S, et al A prospective randomized controlled study of a virtual clinic integrating primary and specialist care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2016; 33: 768-76.
67. Protheroe J, Rathod T, Bartlam B, et al. The feasibility of Health Trainer Improved Patient Self-Management in patients with Low Health literacy and poorly controlled Diabetes: a pilot Randomised Controlled Trial. J Diabetes Res 2016; 2016: 1-11.
68. Wild SH, Hanley J, Lewis SC, et al. Supported Telemonitoring and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes: The Telescot Diabetes Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002163.
69. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-Analysis and apply the results to patient care: users guides to the medical literature. JAMA 2014; 312: 171-9.
70. Sun X, Ioannidis JP, Agoritsas T, et al. How to use a subgroup analysis: users guide to the medical literature. JAMA 2014; 311: 405-11.
71. Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, et al. Heterogeneity: subgroups, metaregression, Bias and bias-Adjustment. NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document [Internet] 2012.
72. Health and Information and Quality Authority. Health technology assessment of chronic disease self-management support interventions, 2015.
73. Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta-Analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2004; 363: 1589-97.
74. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, et al.computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1759-66.
75. Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99: 926-43.
76. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22(4 Suppl): 15-38.
77. Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, et al A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1675-88.
78. Saxena S, Misra T, Car J, et al. Systematic review of primary healthcare interventions to improve diabetes outcomes in minority ethnic groups. J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30: 218-30.
79. Wang Y, Yeo QQ, Ko Y. Economic evaluations of pharmacistmanaged services in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2016; 33: 421-7.
80. Santschi V, Chiolero A, Paradis G, et al. Pharmacist interventions to improve cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 2706-17.
81. Krass I, Schieback P, Dhippayom T. Adherence to diabetes medication: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2015; 32: 725-37.
82. Cramer JA A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1218-24.
83. Vermeire E, Wens J, Van Royen P, et al. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2: Cd003638.
84. Farmer AJ, McSharry J, Rowbotham S, et al. Effects of interventions promoting monitoring of medication use and brief messaging on medication adherence for people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized trials. Diabet Med 2016; 33: 565-79.
85. Cleveringa FG, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, et al.computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15: 180-92.
86. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes RB; CDSS Systematic Review Team. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Diabet Med 2013; 30: 739-45.