Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetes Care

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1759-1766

  Pal, Kingshuk ^a   Eastwood, Sophie V ^b   Michie, Susan ^a   Farmer, Andrew ^c   Barnard, Maria L ^d   Peacock, Richard ^e   Wood, Bindie ^f   Edwards, Phil ^g   Murray, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d WHITTINGTON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e Archway Healthcare Library   (United Kingdom)

^f Diabetes Self Management Program (DSMP) Co creating Health   (United Kingdom)

^g LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; LIPID; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; BEHAVIOR; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CAUSE OF DEATH; COGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; EMOTION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LIPID BLOOD LEVEL; META ANALYSIS; MOBILE PHONE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SELF CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT; BLOOD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELF CARE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84901430754     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 19355548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1386     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al.; Global Burden ofMetabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Blood Glucose). National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2z7 million participants. Lancet 2011;378:31-40
2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 5th Edition: The Global Burden, [Internet], 2011. Available fromhttp://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/ 5e/the-global-burden. Accessed 11 June 2012
3. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007. Diabetes Care 2008;31:596-615
4. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001;24:561-587
5. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1159-1171
6. Duke SA, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 1:CD005268
7. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2: CD003417
8. Duncan I, Birkmeyer C, Coughlin S, Li QE, Sherr D, Boren S. Assessing the value of diabetes education. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:752-760
9. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Internet], 2011. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 5 February 2014
10. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health 2011;26:1479-1498
11. Quinn CC, Clough SS, Minor JM, Lender D, Okafor MC, Gruber-Baldini A. WellDoc mobilediabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10:160-168
12. Smith L, Weinert C. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2000;26:645-655
13. Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, et al. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2005;28:33-39
14. Christian JG, Bessesen DH, Byers TE, Christian KK, GoldsteinMG, Bock BC. Clinic-based support to help overweight patients with type 2 diabetes increase physical activity and lose weight. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:141-146
15. Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, Toobert DJ, et al. Effects of a brief computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention on dietary, biological and quality-of-life outcomes. Chronic Illn 2006;2:27-38
16. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, et al. Onlinediabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1275-1281
17. Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Toobert DJ, Brown J, Hampson SE, Riddle MC. Long-term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Educ Couns 1997;32:175-184
18. Leu MG, Norris TE, Hummel J, Isaac M, Brogan MW. A randomized, controlled trial of an automated wireless messaging system for diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:710-718; discussion 719-720
19. Lim S, Kang SM, Shin H, et al. Improved glycemic control without hypoglycemia in elderly diabetic patients using the ubiquitous healthcare service, a new medical information system. Diabetes Care 2011;34:308-313
20. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, BallewSH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1934-1942
21. Wise PH, Dowlatshahi DC, Farrant S, Fromson S, Meadows KA. Effect of computerbased learning on diabetes knowledge and control.diabetes Care 1986;9:504-508
22. Yoo HJ, Park MS, KimTN, et al. A Ubiquitous Chronic Disease Care system using cellular phones and the internet. Diabet Med 2009;26:628-635
23. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, et al. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:1315-1322
24. Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, BarreraMJr. TheD-Netdiabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med 2003;36: 410-419
25. Zhou YD, Gu W. [Computer assisted nutrition therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2003;32: 244-248
26. Lo R, Lo B, Wells E, Chard M, Hathaway J. The development and evaluation of a computeraideddiabetes education program. Aust J Adv Nurs 1996;13:19-27
27. Minet L, Møller S, Vach W, Wagner L, Henriksen JE. Mediating the effect of self-care management intervention in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 47 randomised controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns 2010;80:29-41
28. Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:105-110
29. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2011;28:455-463
30. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol 2009; 28:690-701
31. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci 2009;4:40
32. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personalitysocial, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull 1982;92:111-135
33. Cleveringa FG, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, van Gijsel J, Rutten GE. Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15: 180-192
34. Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, et al. Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ 2013;346:f657