Multi-scale encoding of amino acid sequences for predicting protein interactions using gradient boosting decision tree

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Zhou, Chang ^a   Yu, Hua ^a   Ding, Yijie ^a   Guo, Fei ^a   Gong, Xiu Jun ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; WNT PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; GRADIENT BOOSTING DECISION TREE ALGORITHM; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; BIOLOGY; DECISION TREE; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; HELICOBACTER PYLORI; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATASETS AS TOPIC; DECISION TREES; HELICOBACTER PYLORI; HUMANS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; WNT PROTEINS;

EID: 85027018673     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181426     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zhao X., Wang R., Chen L., et al. Gene function prediction using labeled and unlabeled data. BMC Bioinformatics.2008; 9(1):297–315. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-57
2. Zhu H., Bilgin M., Bangham R., Hall D., et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science.2001; 293:2101–2105. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062191 PMID: 11474067
3. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, Adams SL, et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature.2002; 415:180–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/415180a PMID: 11805837
4. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A, et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature.2002; 415:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/415141a PMID: 11805826
5. You ZH, Lei YK, Gui J, Huang DS, Zhou XB. Using manifold embedding for assessing and predicting protein interactions from high-throughput experimental data. Bioinformatics.2010; 26(21):2744–2751. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq510 PMID: 20817744
6. Cui W. J., Gong X. J., Yu H., Zhang X. Mining topological structures of PPI networks for human brain specific genes. Genetics and Molecular Research.2015 Oct 16; 14(4):12437–45. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.16.10 PMID: 26505393
7. Skrabanek L, Saini H K, Bader G D, et al. Computational prediction of protein–protein interactions. Molecular Biotechnology.2008; 38(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-007-0069-2 PMID: 18095187
8. Shen J, Zhang J, Luo X, et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.2007; 104(11):4337–4341. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607879104
9. Guo Y., Yu L., Wen Z., Li M. Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein protein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Research.2008; 36(9):3025–3030. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn159 PMID: 18390576
10. Zhou Y.Z., Gao Y., Zheng Y.Y. Prediction of protein-protein interactions using local description of amino acid sequence. Advances in Computer Science and Education Applications.2011;254–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22456-0_37
11. Yang L., Xia J.F., Gui J. Prediction of protein-protein interactions from protein sequence using local descriptors. Protein and Peptide Letters.2010; 17(9):1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.2174/ 092986610791760306 PMID: 20509850
12. You ZH, Zhu L, Zheng CH, Yu HJ, Deng SP. Prediction of protein-protein interactions from amino acid sequences using a novel multi-scale continuous and discontinuous feature set. Bmc Bioinforma.2014; 15(15):S9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S15-S9
13. Y. Z.H., Chan K., Hu P. Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary protein sequences using a novel multi-scale local feature representation scheme and the random forest. Plos One.2015; 10(5): 0125811.
14. Liu B, Liu F, Fang L, et al. repDNA: a Python package to generate various modes of feature vectors for DNA sequences by incorporating user-defined physicochemical, properties and sequence-order effects. Bioinformatics.2015; 31(8):1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu820 PMID: 25504848
15. Liu B, Liu F, Fang L, et al. repRNA: a web server for generating various feature vectors of RNA sequences. Molecular Genetics and Genomics.2016; 291(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-015-1078-7
16. Liu B, Liu F, Wang X, et al. Pse-in-One: a web server for generating various modes of pseudo components of DNA, RNA, and protein sequences Nucleic Acids Research.2015; 43(W1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv458
17. Ding Y, Tang J, Guo F. Identification of Protein–Protein Interactions via a Novel Matrix-Based Sequence Representation Model with Amino Acid Contact Information. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2016; 17(10):1623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17101623
18. Friedman J H. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics.2001; 29(5):1189–1232.
19. Friedman B J, Hastie T., and Tibshirami R. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. Annals of Statistics.2000; 28:337–407.
20. Johnson, R., and Zhang, T. Learning Nonlinear Functions Using Regularized Greedy Forest. Technical Report. 2012.varXiv:1109.0887.
21. Martin S, Roe D, Faulon JL. Predicting protein–protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics.2005; 21(2):218–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth483 PMID: 15319262
22. Huang YA, You ZH, Gao X, Wong L, Wang L. Using weighted sparse representation model combined with discrete cosine transformation to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequence. BioMed Research International.2015; 2015:1–10.
23. Chen J, Guo M, Wang X, et al. A comprehensive review and comparison of different computational methods for protein remote homology detection. Briefings in Bioinformatics.2016;1–14.
24. Ding Y, Tang J, Fei G. Predicting protein-protein interactions via multivariate mutual information of protein sequences. Bmc Bioinformatics.2016; 17(1):398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1253-9 PMID: 27677692
25. Wong L, You ZH, Li S, Huang YA, Liu G. Detection of Protein-Protein Interactions from Amino Acid Sequences Using a Rotation Forest Model with a Novel PR-LPQ Descriptor. Lect Notes Comput Sci.2015; 9227:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22053-6_75
26. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell.2005; 122(6):957–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 PMID: 16169070
27. Ding C, Yuan L F, Guo S H, et al. Identification of mycobacterial membrane proteins and their types using over-represented tripeptide compositions Journal of Proteomics.2012; 77(24):321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.09.006 PMID: 23000219
28. Yang H, Tang H, Chen X X, et al. Identification of Secretory Proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosisUs-ing Pseudo Amino Acid Composition. Biomed Research International.2016; 2016:5413903. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5413903 PMID: 27597968
29. Chen Xin-Xin,Tang Hua,Li Wen-Chao, Wu Hao,Chen Wei,Ding Hui, and Lin Hao. Identification of Bacterial Cell Wall Lyases via Pseudo Amino Acid Composition. BioMed Research International.2016;8
30. Zhao Y W, Lai H Y, Tang H, et al. Prediction of phosphothreonine sites in human proteins by fusing different features Scientific Reports.2016; 6:34817. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34817 PMID: 27698459
31. Zhang C J, Tang H, Li W C, et al. iOri-Human: identify human origin of replication by incorporating dinu-cleotide physicochemical properties into pseudo nucleotide composition. Oncotarget.2014; 7(43): 69783.
32. Liu B, Fang L, Ren L, et al. iEnhancer-2L: a two-layer predictor for identifying enhancers and their strength by pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition. Bioinformatics.2016; 32(3):362. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv604 PMID: 26476782
33. Lin H, Liang Z Y, Tang H, et al. Identifying sigma70 promoters with novel pseudo nucleotide composition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology & Bioinformatics.2017;1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2017.2666141
34. Liu B, Long R, Chou K C. iDHS-EL: Identifying DNase I hypersensitive-sites by fusing three different modes of pseu-do nucleotide composition into an ensemble learning framework. Bioinformatics.2016; 32(16). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw186
35. Liang Z Y, Lai H Y, Yang H, et al. Pro54DB: a database for experimentally verified sigma-54 promoters. Bioinformatics.2017. PMID: 28171531
36. Liu B, Wu H, Zhang D, et al. Pse-Analysis: a python package for DNA/RNA and protein/peptide sequence analysis based on pseudo components and kernel methods Oncotarget.2017;(8)13338–13343 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14524 PMID: 28076851