Coreference resolution with and without linguistic knowledge

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 893-898

  Uryupina, Olga ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; FEATURE SETS; LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE; MACHINE LEARNERS; STATE OF THE ART; STATISTICAL APPROACH; TRADITIONAL LEARNING;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85026959754     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Chris Barker and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1990. A theory of command relations. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13(1):1-34.
2. Alexander Budanitsky and Graeme Hirst. 2001. Semantic distance in wordnet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. In Proceedings of the NAACL Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources.
3. Claire Cardie and Kiri Wagstaff. 1999. Noun phrase coreference as clustering. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 82-89.
4. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 132-139.
5. William W. Cohen. 1995. Fast effective rule induction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115-123.
6. Dan Cristea, Oana Postolache, and Ruslan Mitkov. 2002. Handling complex anaphora resolution cases. In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium.
7. James Curran and Stephen Clark. 2003a. Investigating gis and smoothing for maximum entropy taggers. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 91-98.
8. James R. Curran and Stephen Clark. 2003b. Language independent NER using a maximum entropy tagger. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Natural Language Learning, pages 164-167.
9. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203-226.
10. Sanda Harabagiu, Rǎzvan Bunescu, and Steven Maiorano. 2001. Text and knowledge mining for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 55-62.
11. Lynette Hirschman and Nancy Chinchor. 1997. MUC-7 coreference task definition. In Message Understanding Conference Proceedings.
12. Jerry Hobbs. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:311-338.
13. Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. MIT-Press.
14. Shalom Lapin and Herbert J. Leass. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational LInguistics, 20(4):535-561.
15. Zhang Le, 2004. Maximum Entropy Modelling Toolkit for Python and C++.
16. Xiaoqiang Luo, Abe Ittycheriah, Hongyan Jing, Nanda Kambhatla, and Salim Roukos. 2004. A mention-synchronous coreference resolution algorithm based on the bell tree. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computationa Linguistics.
17. Andrew McCallum and Ben Wellner. 2003. Toward conditional models of identity uncertainty with application to proper noun coreference. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Information Integration on the Web.
18. Joseph McCarthy and Wendy Lehnert. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1050-1055.
19. George Miller. 1990. Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography.
20. Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002a. Combining sample selection and error-driven pruning for machine learning of coreference rules. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
21. Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002b. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computationa Linguistics, pages 104-111.
22. J. Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufman.
23. Jeffrey C. Reynar and Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing.
24. Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Daniel Chung Yong Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics (Special Issue on Computational Anaphora Resolution), 27(4):521-544.
25. Michael Strube, Stefan Rapp, and Christof Müller. 2002. The influence of minimum edit distance on reference resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 312-319.
26. Olga Uryupina. 2004a. Evaluating name-matching for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
27. Olga Uryupina. 2004b. Linguistically motivated sample selection for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium.
28. Vladimir V. Vapnik. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer.
29. Renata Vieira and Massimo Poesio. 2000. An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):539-593.
30. Renata Vieira. 1999. Applying inductive decision trees in resolution of definite NPs. In Proceedings of the Argentine Symposium on Artificial Intelligence.
31. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, Guodong Zhou, and Chew-Lim Tan. 2004. Improving pronoun resolution by incorporating coreferential information of candidates. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computationa Linguistics.