Improving pronoun resolution by incorporating coreferential information of candidates

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 127-134

  Yang, Xiaofeng ^a,b   Su, Jian ^a   Zhou, Guodong ^a   Tan, Chew Lim ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOUN PHRASE; PERFORMANCE; PRONOUN RESOLUTION; PROPERTY;

EID: 84880261441     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Brennan, M. Friedman, and C. Pollard. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compuational Linguistics, pages 155–162.
2. N. Ge, J. Hale, and E. Charniak. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora.
3. B. Grosz, A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1983. Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 44–50.
4. B. Grosz, A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1995. Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225.
5. R. Iida, K. Inui, H. Takamura, and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of EACL, Workshop”The Computational Treatment of Anaphora”.
6. R. Mitkov. 1998. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of the 17th Int. Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 869–875.
7. R. Mitkov. 1999. Anaphora resolution: The state of the art. Technical report, University of Wolverhampton.
8. MUC-6. 1995. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
9. MUC-7. 1998. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
10. V. Ng and C. Cardie. 2002. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 104–111, Philadelphia.
11. M. Paul, K. Yamamoto, and E. Sumita. 1999. Corpus-based anaphora resolution towards antecedent preference. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Workshop”Coreference and It’s Applications”, pages 47–52.
12. J. R. Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
13. C. Sidner. 1981. Focusing for interpretation of pronouns. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(4):217–231.
14. W. Soon, H. Ng, and D. Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521–544.
15. M. Strube and C. Muller. 2003. A machine learning approach to pronoun resolution in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 168–175, Japan.
16. M. Strube. 1998. Never look back: An alternative to centering. In Proceedings of the 17th Int. Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 1251–1257.
17. J. R. Tetreault. 2001. A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):507–520.
18. M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message understanding Conference (MUC-6), pages 45–52, San Francisco, CA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
19. X. Yang, G. Zhou, J. Su, and C. Tan. 2003. Coreference resolution using competition learning approach. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Japan.