Correction to: The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know Revisited (Asian Bioethics Review, (2017), 9, (3-18), 10.1007/s41649-017-0012-1);The right to know and the right not to know revisited: Part One

Asian Bioethics Review

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 3-18

  Brownsword, Roger ^a,b   Wale, Jeff ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genetic information; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Right not to know; Right to know; UK Biobank

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026815355     PISSN: 17938759     EISSN: 17939453     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s41649-019-00075-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Adams, John N., and Roger Brownsword. 2006. Understanding Law. 4th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
2. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. fifth ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Beyleveld, Deryck, and Roger Brownsword. 2007. Consent in the law. Oxford: Hart.
4. Beyleveld, Deryck, and Roger Brownsword. 2015. Research participants and the right to be informed. In Inspiring a medico-legal revolution (essays in honour of Sheila McLean), ed. Pamela R. Ferguson and Graeme T. Laurie, 173. Farnham: Ashgate.
5. Bovenberg, J., T. Meulenkamp, E. Smets, and S. Gevers. 2009. Always expect the unexpected: legal and social aspects of reporting Biobank research results to individual research participants. Nijmegen: Radboud University, Centre for Society and Genomics.
6. Brownsword, Roger. 2007. The ancillary care responsibilities of researchers: reasonable but not great expectations. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35: 679.
7. Brownsword, Roger. 2009. Property in human tissue: triangulating the issue. In Altruism reconsidered: exploring new approaches to property in human tissue, ed. M. Steinman, P. Sykora, and U. Wiesing, 93. Aldershot: Ashgate.
8. Brownsword, Roger. 2016. New genetic tests, new research findings: do patients and participants have a right to know—and do they have a right not to know? Law, Innovation and Technology 8: 247.
9. Brownsword, Roger, and Jeff Wale. 2016. The development of non-invasive prenatal testing: some legal and ethical questions. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 24: 31.
10. Roger Brownsword and Jeff Wale. 2017. ‘Regulating in the global village: the case of non-invasive prenatal tests’ (2017) Bio-Chronicles (forthcoming).
11. Chadwick, R., M. Levitt, and D. Shickle, eds. 2014. The right to know and the right not to know. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Chico, Victoria. 2016. Non-disclosure of genetic risks: The case for developing legal wrongs. Medical Law International 16 (1–2): 3.
13. Chitty, Lyn. 2016 For a successful trial led Great Ormond Street Hospital, see http://www.rapid.nhs.uk/aboutrapid/evaluation-study-nipt-for-down-syndrome (last accessed 25 Sept 2016).
14. Deans, Z., A.J. Clarke, and A.J. Newson. 2015. For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using noninvasive prenatal testing to test purely for information. Bioethics 29: 19.
15. Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth. Ethics and Governance Council of UK Biobank. 2015. Feedback of Health Related Findings: Foreground Principles and Background Perspectives (London).
16. Fay, Michael. 2016. Negligence, genetics and families: a duty to disclose actionable risks. Medical Law International 16 (3–4): 115.
17. Gallagher, J. 2016 ‘Safer Down’s test backed for NHS use’ (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35311578) (last accessed 25 Sept 2016).
18. Greely, Henry T. 2016. The end of sex and the future of human reproduction. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.
19. Hall, A., Bostanci A., and John, S. 2009. Ethical, legal and social issues arising from cell-free fetal DNA technologies (PHG Foundation); (available at: http://www.phgfoundation.org/download/ffdna/ffDNA_appendix.pdf.).
20. Halliburton, C.M. 2009. How privacy killed Katz: a tale of cognitive freedom and the property of personhood as fourth amendment norm. Akron Law Review 42: 803.
21. Johnston, C., and J. Kaye. 2004. Does the UK biobank have a legal obligation to feedback individual findings to participants? Medical Law Review 12: 239.
22. Kolata, Gina. 2017. ‘FDAWill Allow 23andMe to sell genetic tests for disease risk to consumers’ The New York Times (April 6, 2017).
23. Lanier, J. 2013. Who owns the future? London: Allen Lane.
24. Laurie, Graeme, et al. 2010. Managing access to biobanks: how can we reconcile individual privacy and public interests in genetic research? Medical Law International 10: 315; 330–331.
25. Lessig, Lawrence. 2006. Code Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, Chapter 15.
26. Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The common law tradition: deciding appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.
27. Montgomery, Jonathan, and Elsa Montgomery. 2016. Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision? Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 89.
28. Mozersky, Jessica, Vardit Ravitsky, Rayna Rapp, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, and Megan Allyse. 2017. Toward an ethically sensitive implementation of noninvasive prenatal screening in the global context. Hastings Center Report 47 (2): 41, at 42.
29. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 1993. Genetic screening: ethical issues (London).
30. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2017. Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
31. Oswald, K. 2015. ‘Prenatal blood test detects cancer in mothers-to-be’, Bionews 739 at http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_503998.asp. (last accessed 25 Sept 2016).
32. Ravitsky, Vardit. 2016. ‘Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): identifying key clinical, ethical, social, legal and policy issues’: available at http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/NIPT-background-paper-8-Nov-2015-FINAL.pdf (last accessed 27 April 2016).
33. Ravitsky, Vardit, Guichon, Juliet, Lemoine, Marie-Eve, and Giroux, Michelle. 2017. ‘The conceptual foundation of the right to know one’s genetic origins’ BioNews 903 (June 5, 2017) (available at http://www.bionews.org.uk/page.asp?obj_id=847313&PPID=847245&sid=580) (last accessed 11 June 2017).
34. Sequenom’s MaterniT 21 PLUS. 2017. ‘Can tell you if you are having a boy or a girl, and screens for both common and rare chromosomal abnormalities. The test screens for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome), and many others that can affect your baby’s health’: see https://sequenom.com/tests/reproductive-health/maternit21-plus#patient-overview (last accessed 5 April 2017).
35. Tusikov, Natasha. 2016. Chokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet (University of California Press).
36. Wale, Jeff. 2015. Don't forget the legal framework: the public provision of non-invasive prenatal testing in England & Wales. Medical Law International 15 (4): 203.
37. Wallach, Wendell. 2015. A dangerous master. New York: Basic Books.
38. Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council. 2012. Assessing public attitudes to health related findings in research (London).
39. Wolf, Susan M., et al. 2012. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genetics in Medicine 14: 361.