Negligence, genetics and families: A duty to disclose actionable risks

Medical Law International

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 2016, Pages 115-142

  Fay, Michael ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disclosure; duty; family; genetics; negligence; risks

Indexed keywords

ALPHA 1 ANTITRYPSIN DEFICIENCY; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC RISK; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; HUNTINGTON CHOREA; JURISPRUDENCE; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; PHYSICAL VIOLENCE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL WELFARE;

EID: 85006271562     PISSN: 09685332     EISSN: 20479441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0968533216664113     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. M. Fay, 'Informing the Family: A Geneticist's Duty to Disclose Genetic Risks to Relatives of the Proband', Journal of Professional Negligence 27(2) (2011), p. 97.
2. R. Gilbar and C. Foster, 'Doctor's Liability to the Patient's Relatives in Genetic Medicine', Medical Law Review 24(1) (2015), pp. 112-123
3. G. Laurie, Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-legal Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 270
4. M. Brazier, 'Do No Harm - Do Patients have Responsibilities Too?', Cambridge Law Journal 65 (2006), p. 397, 413
5. R. Mulheron, Medical Negligence: Non-patients and Third Party Claims (Ashgate, Farnham: 2010), p. 134.
6. Fay, 'Informing the Family'.
7. Human Genomics Strategy Group, Building on Our Inheritance: Genomic Technology in Healthcare (London: Department of Health, 2012)
8. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, Genomic Medicine (London: HMSO, 2009)
9. BBC News, 'Newborn screening to be extended in pilot study' 8 April 2012
10. Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, '"Next Generation" Gene Sequencer to determine the genetic links of heart disease', Available at: http://www.rbht.nhs.uk/media/press-releases/archive/gene-sequencer-todetermine-the-genetic-links-of-heart-disease/ (accessed 15 November 2010).
11. P. Aldhous, 'Genome Sequencing Falls to US$5000' New Scientist (6 February 2009).
12. US National Library of Medicine, Genetic Home Reference, 'What is the Cost of Genetic Testing and How Long Does it Take to Get the Results', Available at: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/costresults (accessed 14 June 2016).
13. See Gene Health UK. Available at: https://www.genehealthuk.com/cancer-genetic-testingprices (accessed 1 July 2016).
14. Caparo v. Dickman [1990] 2AC 605, HL. The test requires foreseeable harm, proximity and a duty to be fair, just and reasonable.
15. ABC, 13.
16. Smith, 27.
17. Smith, 25.
18. People of the State of New York v. Robert Bierenbaum, Indictment #8295/99.
19. Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562, per Lord Atkin at 580.
20. K v. SOS Home Department.
21. Smith at 27.
22. Selwood., 456.
23. Gilbar and Foster, 'Doctor's Liability', p. 116.
24. Gilbar and Foster, 'Doctor's Liability', p. 116.
25. Dper Lord Nicholls, 85.
26. X, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson, 751.
27. Gilbar and Foster, 'Doctor's Liability', p. 117.
28. See also Merthyr v. Tydfil CBC v. C [2010] EWHC 869, QB.
29. Gilbar and Foster, 'Doctor's Liability', p. 117.
30. See G. Suthers et al., 'Letting the Family Know: Balancing Ethics and Effectiveness when Notifying Relatives about Genetic Testing for a Familial Disorder', Journal of Medical Genetics 43 (2006), p. 665.
31. D. Nolan, 'New Forms of Damage in Negligence', Modern Law Review 70(1) (2007), pp. 59-88, 59
32. see also V. Chico, Genomic Negligence: An Interest in Autonomy as the Basis for Novel Negligence Claims Generated by Genetic Technology (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2011)
33. J. Stapleton, 'The GIST of Negligence', Law Quarterly Review 104 (1988), p. 213.
34. C. Whitting, Street on Torts. 14th ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2015), p. 37.
35. Stapleton, 'GIST of Negligence'.
36. Chico, Genomic Negligence.
37. R. Brownsword, 'An Interest in Human Dignity as the Basis for Genomic Torts', Washburn Law Journal 42 (2000), p. 413.
38. Montgomery, per Lady Hale, 108.
39. McFarlane v. Tayside Health Board [2000] 2AC 59.
40. Rees v. Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust [2003] UKHL 52.
41. Farraj and Another v. King's College NHS Trust and Another [2009] EWCA Civ 1203.
42. G. Laurie, 'Obligations Arising from Genetic Information - Negligence and the Protection of Familial Interests', Child and Family Law Quarterly 11(2) (1999), pp. 109-124.
43. South Australia Asset Management Corp v. York Montague [1997] AC 191, 213.
44. J. Murphy, Street on Torts. 13th ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2012), p. 158.
45. C. Purshouse, 'Judicial Reasoning and the Concept of Damage', Medical Law International 15(2-3) (2015), p. 155
46. J. Coggon, 'Varied and Principled Understandings of Autonomy in English Law', Health Care Analysis 15(3) (2007), p. 235
47. T. Keren-Paz, 'Compensating Injury to Autonomy: A Conceptual and Normative Analysis' in K. Barker, K. Fairweather, R. Grnatham (eds) Private Law in the Twenty-First Century (Hart, Oxford: forthcoming 2017).
48. Stapleton, 'GIST of Negligence', p. 443.
49. E. Almqvist et al., 'AWorldwide Assessment of the Frequency of Suicide, Suicide Attempts, or Psychiatric Hospitalization after Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease', American Journal of Human Genetics 64 (1999), p. 1293.
50. Ravenscroft v. Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73.
51. Group B Plaintiffs v. Medical Research Council [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 161
52. Grieves v. FT Everard [2007] UKHL 39.
53. Safer, 1192.
54. Safer, 623.
55. E.g. Bradshaw v. Daniels 845 SW 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Tennessee 1993).
56. Safer, 626.
57. C. Parker, 'Camping Trips and Family Trees: Must Tennessee Physicians Warn their Patient's Relatives of Genetic Risks?', Tennessee Law Review 65 (1998), p. 585, 597.
58. Parker, 'Camping Trips'.
59. Safer, 626.
60. Chico, Genomic Negligence
61. Keren-Paz, 'Injury to Autonomy'.
62. Caparo, per Lord Oliver, 633A.
63. Stapleton, 'GIST of Negligence', p. 443.
64. Donoghue, 580.
65. Palmer, 12.
66. ABC, 5.
67. Gilbar and Foster, 'Doctor's Liability', p. 114.
68. A. Parker and A. Lucassen, 'Concerns for Families and Individuals in Clinical Genetics', Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2003), p. 70.
69. Donoghue, 580.
70. Palmer, 12.
71. Smith, 27.
72. Safer, 1192.
73. B. Knoppers et al., 'Professional Disclosure of Familial Genetic Information', American Journal of Human Genetics 62 (1998), p. 474, 481.
74. Laurie, 'Obligations'.
75. See Edwards v. Lamb 45 A 480, 484 (NH 1899)
76. Skillings v. Allen 173 NW 663 (Minn. 1919)
77. Davis v. Rodman 227 SW 612, 614 (Ark. 1921)
78. Jones v. Stanko 160 NE 456, 458 (Ohio, 1928)
79. Bradshaw v. Daniels, 845 SW 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Tennessee 1993).
80. Pate, 282.
81. ABC, 13.
82. Safer, 1192.
83. G. Laurie, S. Harmon and G. Porter, Mason and McCall Smith's Law and Medical Ethics. 10th ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2016), p. 223.
84. Pate, 282.
85. Pate, 282.
86. Safer, 1192.
87. E.g. Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53
88. X & Others (minors) v. Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 2AC 633, HL.
89. Laurie, 'Obligations'.
90. ABC, 13.
91. T. Heaton and V. Chico, 'Attitudes Towards the Sharing of Genetic Information with at Risk Relatives: Results of a Quantitative Survey', Human Genetics 135 (2016), p. 109, 114.
92. M. Parker and A. Lucassen, 'Confidentiality and Sharing Genetic Information with Relatives', The Lancet 375 (2010), p. 1507
93. Suthers et al., 'Letting the Family Know'.
94. Attorney General v. Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1AC 109, HL, per Lord Goff, 282.; W v. Egdell.
95. ABC, 13.
96. G. Laurie, Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-legal Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 231.
97. R. Harvey and E. Mugnai. The 'Right to Life': Commentary on Article 2 (Children's Legal Centre, 2002), p. 13.
98. LCB, 36.
99. L. Lester, L. Pannick and J. Herberg, Human Rights Law and Practice. 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 2009), at 4.2.55.
100. D. Cobb, 'The Supreme Court and the State's Duty to Protect Vulnerable Groups: The Effect of Rabone', Scots Law Times 75 (2012), p. 77.
101. For example, Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] AC 789.
102. see X v. Ireland (1974) 7 DR 78.
103. Available at: http://www.genomicsengland.co.uk (accessed 1 July 2016).
104. Available at: http://www.personalgenomes.org/uk (accessed 1 July 2016).
105. General Medical Council, Confidentiality: Guidelines for Doctors (London, 2009), paragraph 53, GMC.
106. Laurie et al., Law and Medical Ethics, p. 224.
107. Chico, Genomic Negligence, p. 177.
108. See American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, 'AMCG Updates Recommendations on "opt out" for Genome Sequencing Return of Results' (AMCG, Bethesda: 2014).
109. D. Wertz and J. Fletcher, 'Privacy and Disclosure in Medical Genetics Examined in an Ethic of Care', Bioethics 5 (1991), p. 212, 221.
110. Laurie et al., Law and Medical Ethics, p. 225.
111. see G. Laurie, 'Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications', Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42(1) (2014), p. 53.
112. Heaton and Chico, 'Attitudes', p. 115.
113. Suthers et al., 'Letting the Family Know'. Of 351 family members contacted, 25 respondents indicated a wish not to receive any further information.
114. Heaton and Chico, 'Attitudes', p. 115.
115. Laurie, 'Genetic Privacy', p. 261.
116. T. McNeil et al., 'Psychosocial Effects of Screening for Somatic Risk: The Swedish a1-Antitrypsin Experience', Thorax 43 (1988), p. 505.
117. Laurie, 'Genetic Privacy', p. 124.
118. McNeil, 'Psychosocial Effects', pp. 505-506.
119. Almqvist, 'The frequency of suicide, after predictive testing for Huntington's disease'. The results extrapolate to 138 per 100,000 compared to 12-13 per 100,000. The significance of the study was that it focused on the two years immediately after predictive genetic testing.
120. Danish Council of Bioethics, Ethics and Mapping the Human Genome (Copenhagen, 1993), p. 60.
121. See E. Parsons et al. 'Disclosure of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy after Newborn Screening', Archives of Disease in Childhood 74 (1996), p. 550.
122. M. Fay, 'Negligence and the Communication of Neonatal Genetic Information to Parents', Medical Law Review 20(4) (2012), p. 604.
123. see Re YZ [2013] EWHC Fam 935.
124. Laurie, 'Genetic Privacy', p. 122.
125. Chico, Genomic Negligence, p. 179.