Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 32, Issue , 2015, Pages 126-138

  Williams, Hywel T P ^a   McMurray, James R ^b   Kurz, Tim ^a   Hugo Lambert, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Echo chamber; Opinion leader; Polarisation; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; NETWORK ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 84929156868     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adamic L.A., Glance N. The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery 2005, 36-43. ACM.
2. Asur S., Huberman B.A. Predicting the future with social media. Proc. Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 2010, 492-499. IEEE.
3. Auer M.R., Zhang Y., Lee P. The potential of microblogs for the study of public perceptions of climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 2014.
4. Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2009) 2009.
5. Blondel V.D., Guillaume J.L., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, 2008:P10008.
6. Bond R.M., Fariss C.J., Jones J.J., Kramer A.D.I., Marlow C., Settle J.E., Fowler J.H. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 2012, 489:295-298.
7. Bonetta L. Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell 2007, 129:443-445.
8. Borge-Holthoefer J., Rivero A., Garcia I., Cauhe E., Ferrer A., Ferrer D., Francos D., Iniguez D., Pilar Perez M., Ruiz G., Sanz F., Serrano F., Vinas C., Tarancon A., Moreno Y. Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: the Spanish May 15th movement as a case study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e23883.
9. Capstick S.B., Pidgeon N.F. What is climate change scepticism? examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, Early edition.
10. Carvalho A. Media(ted) discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 2010, 1:172-179.
11. Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 2010, 329:1194-1197.
12. Cha M., Benevenuto F., Haddadi H., Gummadi K. The world of connections and information flow in Twitter. Syst. Man Cybern. A: Syst. Hum. 2012, 42:991-998.
13. Cha M., Haddadi H., Benevenuto F., Gummadi P.K. Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-10) 2010, 10-17.
14. Christakis N.A., Fowler J.H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357:370-379.
15. Christakis N.A., Fowler J.H. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358:2249-2258.
16. Conover M., Ratkiewicz J., Francisco M., Gonçalves B., Menczer F., Flammini A. Political polarization on Twitter. Proc. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011) 2011.
17. Conover M.D., Gonçalves B., Flammini A., Menczer F. Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Sci. 2012, 1:1-19.
18. Czopp A.M. The passive activist: negative consequences of failing to confront anti-environmental statements. Ecopsychology 2013, 5:17-23.
19. Edwards D., Potter J. Discursive Psychology 1992, Sage, London.
20. Farrell H. The consequences of the internet for politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2012, 15:35-52.
21. Fowler J.H., Christakis N.A. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. BMJ: Br. Med. J. 2008, 337.
22. Gallois C., Ogay T., Giles H. Communication accommodation theory: a look back and a look ahead. Theorizing About Intercultural Communication 2005, 121-148. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. W. Gudykunst (Ed.).
23. Gambhir V., Kumar P. How the people of India live with climate change and what communication can do. Technical Report. BBC Media Action: Climate Asia Project 2013.
24. Girvan M., Newman M.E. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99:7821-7826.
25. Hagberg A.A., Schult D.A., Swart P.J. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Proc. 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008) 2008, 11-15.
26. Hulme M. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. IPCC Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. T. Stocker, D. Qin, G.K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P. Midgley (Eds.).
28. Jackson M.O. Social and Economic Networks 2010, Princeton University Press.
29. Jacomy M., Heymann S., Venturini T., Bastian M. ForceAtlas2: A Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization. Technical Report. Sciences Po - Medialab. Paris 2012.
30. Kahan D.M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L.L., Braman D., Mandel G. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2:732-735.
31. Katz E. The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Pub. Opin. Q. 1957, 21:61-78.
32. Katz E., Lazarsfeld P.F. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication 1955, Free Press, Glencoe, IL, USA.
33. Kirilenko A.P., Stepchenkova S.O. Public microblogging on climate change: one year of Twitter worldwide. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, Online early edition.
34. Kramer A.D.I., Guillory J.E., Hancock J.T. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, Online early edition.
35. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C. Global Warming's 'Six Americas': An Audience Segmentation. Technical Report 2008, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Climate Change.
36. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Feinberg G., Rosenthal S., Marlon J. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in November, 2013. Technical Report 2014, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
37. Levitan L.C., Visser P.S. Social network composition and attitude strength: exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 45:1057-1067.
38. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2001, 27:415-444.
39. Moser S.C. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 2010, 1:31-53.
40. Muchnik L., Aral S., Taylor S.J. Social influence bias: a randomized experiment. Science 2013, 341:647-651.
41. Newman M.E. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:8577-8582.
42. Nisbet M.C., Kotcher J.E. A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Sci. Commun. 2009, 30:328-354.
43. Nolan J.M. Creating a culture of conservation: willingness to confront environmental transgressors. Ecopsychology 2013, 5:3-8.
44. O'Connor B., Balasubramanyan R., Routledge B.R., Smith N.A. From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. Proc. ICWSM 2010 2010, 122-129.
45. O'Neill S., Williams H.T., Kurz T., Wiersma B., Boykoff M. Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC fifth assessment report. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n4/full/nclimate2535.html.
46. O'Neill S.J., Boykoff M. Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:E151.
47. Pearce W., Holmberg K., Hellsten I., Nerlich B. Climate change on Twitter: topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e94785.
48. Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Hum. Commun. Res. 2000, 26:341-371.
49. Salganik M.J., Dodds P.S., Watts D.J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 2006, 311:854-856.
50. Schafer M.S. Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 2012, 3:527-543.
51. Shalizi C.R., Thomas A.C. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 2011, 40:211-239.
52. Sharman A. Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 26:159-170.
53. Sørensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 1957, 5:1-34.
54. Sunstein C.R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press 2007, Princeton, NJ, USA.
55. Swim J.K., Bloodhart B. Admonishment and praise: interpersonal mechanisms for promoting pro-environmental behavior. Ecopsychology 2013, 5:24-35.
56. Tajfel H., Turner J.C.. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 1979, 33-47. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA. W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.).
57. Tamburrini N., Cinnirella M., Jansen V.A., Bryden J. Twitter users change word usage according to conversation-partner social identity. Soc. Netw. 2015, 40:84-89.
58. Tumasjan A., Sprenger T.O., Sandner P.G., Welpe I.M. Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proc. ICWSM 2010 2010, 178-185.
59. Twitter Twitter REST API v1.1 Documentation 2013, (accessed 30.11.13).
60. United States Securities Exchange Commission Form S-1 Registration Statement 2013, Twitter, Inc., (accessed 11.08.14).
61. Valente T.W. Network interventions. Science 2012, 337:49-53.
62. Visser P.S., Mirabile R.R. Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 87:779-795.
63. Wu S., Hofman J.M., Mason W.A., Watts D.J. Who says what to whom on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web 2011, 705-714.
64. Zhao S., Grasmuck S., Martin J. Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2008, 24:1816-1836.