Experiences using an interactive presentation platform in a functional and logic programming course

UMAP 2017 - Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 311-316

  Triglianos, Vasileios ^a   Labaj, Martin ^b   Moro, Robert ^b   Simko, Jakub ^b   Hucko, Michal ^b   Tvarozek, Jozef ^b   Pautasso, Cesare ^a   Bielikova, Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^b SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; TEACHING;

ACTIVE EXPERIMENTATION; CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES; IMMEDIATE FEEDBACKS; INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION; LEARNING OUTCOME; LECTURE MATERIALS; MEMORY ENCODING; STUDY MATERIALS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85026751557     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3099023.3099082     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3 (2009), 114-123.
2. John Brooke and others. 1996. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4-7.
3. Scott Freeman, Sarah L Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 23 (2014), 8410-8415.
4. Robin H Kay and Sharon Lauricella. 2011. Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie 37, 1 (2011).
5. James R. Lewis and Jeff Sauro. 2009. The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Centered Design - HCD 2009, Vol. 5619 LNCS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 94-103.
6. Jaclyn K Maass and Philip I Pavlik Jr. 2016. Modeling the Influence of Format and Depth during Effortful Retrieval Practice. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. 143-150.
7. Michael Prince. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education 93, 3 (2004), 223-231.
8. Susan M. Ravizza, Mitchell G. Uitvlugt, and Kimberly M. Fenn. 2017. Logged In and Zoned Out. Psychological Science 28, 2 (2017), 171-180.
9. Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova. 2015. Askalot: Community Question Answering As a Means for Knowledge Sharing in an Educational Organization. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179-182.
10. Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova. 2016. A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Approaches for Community Question Answering. ACM Trans. Web 10, 3, Article 18 (Aug. 2016), 63 pages.
11. Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova. 2016. Design of CQA Systems for Flexible and Scalable Deployment and Evaluation. In Web Engineering: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Web Engineering - ICWE 2016, Alessandro Boz- zon, Philippe Cudre-Maroux, and Cesare Pautasso (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 439-447.
12. Vasileios Triglianos and Cesare Pautasso. 2014. Interactive Scalable Lectures with ASQ. In Web Engineering: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Web Engineering - ICWE 2014, Sven Casteleyn, Gustavo Rossi, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 515-518.