Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 834-842

  Bruintjes, M H ^a   Van Helden, E V ^a   Braat, A E ^b   Dahan, A ^b   Scheffer, G J ^a   Van Laarhoven, C J ^a   Warle M C ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

artificial; laparoscopy; neuromuscular blockade; pneumoperitoneum

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEEP NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK; EMBASE; HUMAN; HYPOBARISM; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECOVERY ROOM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM; LAPAROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 85026732308     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex116     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Kim MH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Min BS, Yoo YC. Maintaining optimal surgical conditions with low insufflation pressures is possible with deep neuromuscular blockade during laparo-scopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Medicine 2016; 95: e2920
2. Madsen MV, Istre O, Staehr-Rye AK, et al. Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockade and low-pressure pneumoperito-neum: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 341-7
3. Kyle EB, Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Laberge PY, Lemyre M. Low vs standard pressures in gynecologic laparoscopy: asys-tematic review. JSLS 2016; 20: e2015.00113
4. Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, et al. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2016; 34: 197-203
5. Koo BW, Oh AY, Seo KS, Han JW, Han HS, Yoon YS. Randomized clinical trial of moderate versus deep neuro-muscular block for low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2898-903
6. Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic chole-cystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg 2014; 119: 1084-92
7. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in phar-macodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789-808
8. Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring: challenges and opportunities. Anesthesiology 2016; 111: 110-9
9. Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59: 1-16
10. Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Claudius C, Gatke MR. Is deep neuromuscular blockade beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? Yes, probably. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 710-6
11. Kopman AF, Naguib M. Is deep neuromuscular block beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? No, probably not. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 717-22
12. Kopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 51-8
13. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J 2011; 343: d5928
14. Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 430-6
15. Torensma B, Martini CH, Boon M, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during bariatric surgery and reduces postoperative pain: a randomized double blind controlled trial. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167907
16. Blobner M, Frick CG, Stauble RB, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 627-36
17. Yoo YC, Kim NY, Shin S, et al. The intraocular pressure under deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade during low-pressure robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0135412
18. Lindekaer AL, Halvor Springborg H, Istre O. Deep neuromus-cular blockade leads to a larger intraabdominal volume during laparoscopy. J Vis Exp 2013; 76: e50045
19. Madsen MV, Gatke MR, Springborg HH, Rosenberg J, Lund J, Istre O. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy-a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59: 441-7
20. Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 498-505
21. Ozdemir-van Brunschot DM, van Laarhoven KC, Scheffer GJ, Pouwels S, Wever KE, Warle MC. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2049-65
22. Van Wijk RM, Watts RW, Ledowski T, Trochsler M, Moran JL, Arenas GW. Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic chol-ecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59: 434-40
23. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 798-804
24. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 2000; 88: 287-94
25. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculos-keletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004; 8: 283-91