Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective observational study

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 434-440

  Van Wijk, R M ^a   Watts, R W ^a   Ledowski, T ^b   Trochsler, M ^a   Moran, J L ^a   Arenas, G W N ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ROCURONIUM; SUXAMETHONIUM; ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT;

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION; OBESITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; ABDOMEN; ADOLESCENT; AGED; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ABDOMEN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANDROSTANOLS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; NEUROMUSCULAR NONDEPOLARIZING AGENTS; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925305327     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12491     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Henny CP, Hofland J,. Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1163-1171.
2. O'Malley C, Cunningham AJ,. Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2001; 19: 1-19.
3. Valenza F, Chevallard G, Fossali T, Salice V, Pizzocri M, Gattinoni L,. Management of mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2010; 24: 227-241.
4. Bogani G, Cromi A, Casarin J, Ghezzi F,. Low pneumoperitoneum pressure reduces pain after mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy: results from two independent randomized controlled trails. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 967-968.
5. Barczynski M, Herman RM,. A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (lp) and standard-pressure (sp) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 533-538.
6. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T, Buchler MW,. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 95-105.
7. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR,. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (3): CD006930.
8. Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O,. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 430-436.
9. Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A,. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 498-505.
10. Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C,. Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg 2014; 119: 1084-1092.
11. Mencke T, Schmartz D, Fuchs-Buder T,. Neuromuscular monitoring [german]. Anaesthesist 2013; 62: 847-861.
12. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J,. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents ii: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789-808.
13. Mulier JP, Van Lancker P,. What are the challenges of laparoscopy in morbid obese patients?, In:, Leykin Y, Brodsky JB, eds. Controversies in the anesthetic management of the obese surgical patient. Milan: Springer-Verlag, 2013: 219-226.
14. Mulier JP, Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S,. Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1398-1402.
15. Williams MT, Rice I, Ewen SP, Elliott SM,. A comparison of the effect of two anaesthetic techniques on surgical conditions during gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 574-578.
16. Mulier JP, Garcia M, Dillemans B,. Pathophysiology of obesity. Impact on laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2009; 60: 149-153.
17. Song C, Alijani A, Frank T, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A,. Mechanical properties of the human abdominal wall measured in vivo during insufflation for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 987-990.
18. Abu-Rafea B, Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Hollett-Caines J, Al-Omran M,. Effect of body habitus and parity on insufflated CO2 volume at various intraabdominal pressures during laparoscopic access in women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 205-210.