Maintaining optimal surgical conditions with low insufflation pressures is possible with deep neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Kim, Myoung Hwa ^a,b   Lee, Ki Young ^a,b   Lee, Kang Young ^a   Min, Byung Soh ^a   Yoo, Young Chul ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; MORPHINE; ROCURONIUM; SUGAMMADEX; ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE;

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ADULT; AERATION; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTRIC PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PROCEDURES;

ANDROSTANOLS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84962598839     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002920     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1121-1143.
2. Nguyen NT, Anderson JT, Budd M, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:64-71.
3. Hua J, Gong J, Yao L, et al. Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;208:143-150.
4. Joshipura VP, Haribhakti SP, Patel NR, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:234-240.
5. Sandhu T, Yamada S, Ariyakachon V, et al. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1044-1047.
6. Madsen MV, Gatke MR, Springborg HH, et al. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy-A randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:441-447.
7. Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:430-436.
8. Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, et al. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:498-505.
9. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, et al. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: A randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:816-824.
10. Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:991-998.
11. Welliver M, McDonough J, Kalynych N, et al. Discovery development and clinical application of sugammadex sodium, a selective relaxant binding agent. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2009;2:49-59.
12. Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: A randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:1084-1092.
13. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, et al. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: The Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789-808.
14. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:89-91.
15. Rist M, Rauh R, Klingel R, et al. Hemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum in lithotomy position. Zentralbl Chir. 2001;126:75-79.
16. Ozdemir-van Brunschot DM, van Laarhoven KC, Scheffer GJ, et al. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
17. Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:600-608.
18. Khan SA, Khokhar HA, Nasr AR, et al. Effect of epidural analgesia on bowel function in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2581-2591.
19. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, et al. Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1017-1024.
20. Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:90-96.
21. Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:379-384.
22. Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: A preventable event. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1480-1493.
23. Schwarte LA, Scheeren TW, Lorenz C, et al. Moderate increase in intraabdominal pressure attenuates gastric mucosal oxygen saturation in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1081-1087.
24. Schindler E, Muller M, Kelm C. Cerebral carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:643-645.
25. Hubner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, et al. Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Ann Surg. 2015;261:648-653.
26. Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Ristkari S, et al. Splanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and the abdominal wall lift method. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:886-891.
27. Van Wijk RM, Watts RW, Ledowski T, et al. Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:434-440.
28. Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Strate T, et al. Laparoscopic vs open repair of gastric perforation and abdominal lavage of associated peritonitis in pigs. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:212-218.
29. Umar A, Mehta KS, Mehta N. Evaluation of hemodynamic changes using different intra-abdominal pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg. 2013;75:284-289.