A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 966-975

  Waldron, Nathan H ^a   Miller, Timothy E ^a   Thacker, Julie K ^a   Manchester, Amy K ^a   White, William D ^a   Nardiello, John ^a,b   Elgasim, Magdi A ^a   Moon, Richard E ^a   Gan, Tong J ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Duke Raleigh Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DEVICE COMPARISON; DIGESTIVE DEVICE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER MONITOR; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; GOAL DIRECTED FLUID THERAPY; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTESTINE FUNCTION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITOR; NONINVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; WOUND COMPLICATION; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; COLON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; ESOPHAGUS; HEART OUTPUT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECTUM;

AGED; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; CARDIAC OUTPUT; COLON; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; GOALS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; STROKE VOLUME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 84902156628     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000182     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008;109:723-40.
2. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:331-40.
3. Kehlet H, Bundgaard-Nielsen M. Goal-directed perioperative fluid management: why, when, and how? Anesthesiology 2009;110:453-5.
4. Roche AM, Miller TE, Gan TJ. Goal-directed fluid management with trans-oesophageal Doppler. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009;23:327-34.
5. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008;63:44-51.
6. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:820-6.
7. Grocott MP, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1093-106.
8. Mythen MG, Webb AR. Intra-operative gut mucosal hypo perfusion is associated with increased post-operative complications and cost. Intensive Care Med 1994;20:99-104.
9. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997;315:909-12.
10. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:65-71.
11. Bowdle TA. Complications of invasive monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2002;20:571-88.
12. Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009;108:887-97.
13. Mowatt G, Houston G, Hernandez R, de Verteuil R, Fraser C, Cuthbertson B, Vale L. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-95.
14. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008;22:113-9.
15. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): A clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:1191-4.
16. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009;144:961-9.
17. Ramírez JM, Blasco JA, Roig JV, Maeso-Martínez S, Casal JE, Esteban F, Lic DC; Spanish working group on fast track surgery. Enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery: A multicentre study. BMC Surg 2011;11:9.
18. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;2:CD007635.
19. Shaw AD, Stafford-Smith M, White WD, Phillips-Bute B, Swaminathan M, Milano C, Welsby IJ, Aronson S, Mathew JP, Peterson ED, Newman MF. The effect of aprotinin on outcome after coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med 2008;358:784-93.
20. Singer M. Esophageal Doppler monitoring of aortic blood flow: beat-by-beat cardiac output monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1993;31:99-125.
21. Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultra sonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:2060-6.
22. Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care 2009;13:R73.
23. Brienza N, Giglio MT, Marucci M, Fiore T. Does perioperative hemodynamic optimization protect renal function in surgical patients? A meta-analytic study. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2079-90.
24. Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M, Brienza N. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:637-46.
25. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1392-402.
26. Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: Are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg 2011;112:1274-6.
27. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1180-92.
28. Heerdt PM, Wagner CL, DeMais M, Savarese JJ. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring with bioreactance as an alternative to invasive instrumentation for preclinical drug evaluation in beagles. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2011;64:111-8.
29. Pugsley J, Lerner AB. Cardiac output monitoring: Is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010;14:274-82.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
31. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:85-91.
32. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1220-35.
33. Phan TD, Kluger R, Wan C, Wong D, Padayachee A. A comparison of three minimally invasive cardiac output devices with thermodilution in elective cardiac surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011;39:1014-21.
34. Chikhani M, Moppett IK. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: what evidence do we need? Br J Anaesth 2011;106:451-3.
35. Linton NW, Linton RA. Is comparison of changes in cardiac output, assessed by different methods, better than only comparing cardiac output to the reference method? Br J Anaesth 2002;89:336-7.
36. Harris S, Naina HV, Kuppachi S. Look, feel, listen or look, listen, feel? Am J Med 2007;120:e3.
37. West M, Klein MD. Is abdominal auscultation important? Lancet 1982;2:1279.
38. Grabowski JE, Talamini MA. Physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1009-16.
39. Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1069-75.