Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Lung Resection

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 950-957

  Paci, Philippe ^a   Madani, Amin ^a   Lee, Lawrence ^a   Mata, Juan ^a   Mulder, David S ^a   Spicer, Jonathan ^a   Ferri, Lorenzo E ^a   Feldman, Liane S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; BOOTSTRAPPING; CAREGIVER BURDEN; CHYLOTHORAX; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ENHANCED RECOVERY PATHWAY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEMOPTYSIS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG COMPLICATION; LUNG EDEMA; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL INFECTION; TACHYCARDIA; UNCERTAINTY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; AGED; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL COST; LUNG DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT READMISSION; PNEUMONECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85026659184     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.085     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Kehlet, H., Wilmore, D.W., Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248 (2008), 189–198.
2. Feldman, L.S., Introduction to enhanced recovery programs: a paradigm shift in perioperative care. Feldman, L.S., Delaney, C.P., Ljungqvist, O., Carli, F., (eds.) The SAGES/ERAS® Society Manual of Enhanced Recovery Programs for Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–10.
3. Nicholson, A., Lowe, M.C., Parker, J., Lewis, S.R., Alderson, P., Smith, A.F., Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101 (2014), 172–188.
4. Lee, L., Li, C., Robert, N., et al. Economic impact of an enhanced recovery pathway for oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 100 (2013), 1326–1334.
5. Lee, L., Mata, J., Ghitulescu, G.A., et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262 (2015), 1026–1033.
6. Cerfolio, R.J., Pickens, A., Bass, C., Katholi, C., Fast-tracking pulmonary resections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122 (2001), 318–324.
7. McKenna, R.J. Jr., Mahtabifard, A., Pickens, A., Kusuanco, D., Fuller, C.B., Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 84 (2007), 1663–1667.
8. Salati, M., Brunelli, A., Xiume, F., Refai, M., Pompili, C., Sabbatini, A., Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 (2012), 1083–1087.
9. Scarci, M., Solli, P., Bedetti, B., Enhanced recovery pathway for thoracic surgery in the UK. J Thorac Dis 8:Suppl 1 (2016), S78–S83.
10. Madani, A., Fiore, J.F. Jr., Wang, Y., et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery 158 (2015), 899–908.
11. Fiore, J.F. Jr., Bejjani, J., Conrad, K., et al. Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151 (2016), 708–715.e701–6.
12. Zehr, K.J., Dawson, P.B., Yang, S.C., Heitmiller, R.F., Standardized clinical care pathways for major thoracic cases reduce hospital costs. Ann Thorac Surg 66 (1998), 914–919.
13. Fingar KR, Stocks C, Weiss AJ, et al. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012: Statistical Brief #186. Dec 2014. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274246/. Accessed September 3, 2016.
14. Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A, Andrews RM. Characteristics of operating room procedures in U.S. hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #170. Feb 2014. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK195245/. Accessed September 3, 2016.
15. Seely, A.J., Ivanovic, J., Threader, J., et al. Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90 (2010), 936–942.
16. Santé et Services sociaux (Québec). Normes et pratiques de gestion pour les centres hospitaliers [in French]. Available at http://msssa4.msss.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/d26ngest.nsf/lca?OpenView&count=160. Accessed November 1, 2015.
17. Régie de l'assurance maladie (Québec). Manuel de facturation 2013 [in French]. Available at http://www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/professionnels/medecins-specialistes/manuels/Pages/facturation.aspx. Accessed November 1, 2015.
18. Longo, C.J., Deber, R., Fitch, M., et al. An examination of cancer patients’ monthly “out-of-pocket” costs in Ontario, Canada. Eur J Cancer Care 16 (2007), 500–507.
19. Longo, C.J., Fitch, M., Deber, R.B., et al. Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada. Support Care Cancer 14 (2006), 1077–1085.
20. Statistics Canada. Individuals by total income level, by province and territory (Canada). 2013. Available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/101/cst01/fami1105a-eng.htm. Accessed November 3, 2015.
21. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Purchasing power parities (PPP). 2016. Available at https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-ppp.htm. Accessed May 8, 2016.
22. Carli, F., Charlebois, P., Baldini, G., Cachero, O., Stein, B., An integrated multidisciplinary approach to implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Can J Anaesth 56 (2009), 837–842.
23. Paul, S., Altorki, N.K., Sheng, S., et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 (2010), 366–378.
24. Boffa, D.J., Dhamija, A., Kosinski, A.S., et al. Fewer complications result from a video-assisted approach to anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 637–643.
25. Maruyama, R., Miyake, T., Kojo, M., et al. Establishment of a clinical pathway as an effective tool to reduce hospitalization and charges after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54 (2006), 387–390.
26. Cho, S., Do, Y.W., Lee, E.B., Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Endosc 25 (2011), 1054–1061.
27. Lacin, T., Swanson, S., Current costs of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 5:Suppl 3 (2013), S190–S193.
28. EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16 (1990), 199–208.
29. Bejjani, J., Fiore, J.F. Jr., Lee, L., et al. Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection. J Surg Res 194 (2015), 281–288.
30. Roberts, R.O., Bergstralh, E.J., Schmidt, L., Jacobsen, S.J., Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol 49 (1996), 989–995.