Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 194, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 281-288

  Bejjani, Jimmy ^a   Fiore, Julio F ^a   Lee, Lawrence ^a   Kaneva, Pepa ^a   Mata, Juan ^a   Ncuti, Annie ^a   Sirois, Christian ^a   Mulder, David S ^a   Ferri, Lorenzo E ^a   Feldman, Liane S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Lung cancer; Recovery; Thoracic surgery; Thoracotomy; Utility; Validity; Video assisted thoracic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EUROQOL 5 DIMENSION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOBECTOMY; LUNG RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; SURGICAL PATIENT; THORACOTOMY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WEDGE RESECTION; AGE; AGED; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMONECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; THORACOTOMY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84924719381     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N.L. Jones, L. Edmonds, S. Ghosh, and A.A. Klein A review of enhanced recovery for thoracic anaesthesia and surgery Anaesthesia 68 2013 179
2. B.A. Whitson, S.S. Groth, S.J. Duval, S.J. Swanson, and M.A. Maddaus Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 2008 discussion 16-8
3. P. Van Schil Cost analysis of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy: critical review Eur Respir J 22 2003 735
4. K.K. Varadhan, D.N. Lobo, and O. Ljungqvist Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care Crit Care Clin 26 2010 527 x
5. L.B. Russell, M.R. Gold, J.E. Siegel, N. Daniels, and M.C. Weinstein The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 276 1996 1172
6. C. Sorenson, M. Drummond, and K. Chalkidou Comparative effectiveness research: the experience of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence J Clin Oncol 30 2012 4267
7. R. Robinson Cost-utility analysis BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 307 1993 859
8. P. Dolan, and J. Roberts Modelling valuations for Eq-5d health states: an alternative model using differences in valuations Med Care 40 2002 442
9. N.J. Devlin, and P.F. Krabbe The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L Eur J Health Econ 14 Suppl 1 2013 S1
10. J.A. Kopec, and K.D. Willison A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 56 2003 317
11. J. Brazier, N. Jones, and P. Kind Testing the validity of the EuroQol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire Qual Life Res 2 1993 169
12. J.A. Johnson, and S.J. Coons Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample Qual Life Res 7 1998 155
13. M.T. Dyer, K.A. Goldsmith, L.S. Sharples, and M.J. Buxton A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease Health Qual Life Outcomes 8 2010 13
14. L. Lee, T. Tran, N.E. Mayo, F. Carli, and L.S. Feldman What does it really mean to "recover" from an operation? Surgery 155 2014 211
15. A.J. Seely, J. Ivanovic, and J. Threader Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 936 discussion 42
16. N. Bansback, A. Tsuchiya, J. Brazier, and A. Anis Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies PloS One 7 2012 e31115
17. F. Carli, and N. Mayo Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 87 2001 531
18. A. Brunelli, L. Socci, M. Refai, M. Salati, F. Xiume, and A. Sabbatini Quality of life before and after major lung resection for lung cancer: a prospective follow-up analysis Ann Thorac Surg 84 2007 410
19. B. Balduyck, J. Hendriks, P. Lauwers, and P. Van Schil Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 56 2007 423
20. B. Balduyck, J. Hendriks, P. Lauwers, P. Sardari Nia, and P. Van Schil Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery in septuagenarians: a prospective study Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 35 2009 1070 discussion 5
21. M. Salati, A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, and A. Sabbatini Quality of life in the elderly after major lung resection for lung cancer Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 8 2009 79
22. M.K. Ferguson, C.M. Parma, A.D. Celauro, and W.T. Vigneswaran Quality of life and mood in older patients after major lung resection Ann Thorac Surg 87 2009 1007 discussion 12-3
23. J.R. Handy Jr., J.W. Asaph, E.C. Douville, G.Y. Ott, G.L. Grunkemeier, and Y. Wu Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy? Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 37 2010 451
24. F. Leo, P. Scanagatta, F. Vannucci, D. Brambilla, D. Radice, and L. Spaggiari Impaired quality of life after pneumonectomy: who is at risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 2010 49
25. A.S. Pickard, M.P. Neary, and D. Cella Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer Health Qual Life Outcomes 5 2007 70
26. I.R. White, P. Royston, and A.M. Wood Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice Stat Med 30 2011 377
27. F. Barzi, and M. Woodward Imputations of missing values in practice: results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies Am J Epidemiol 160 2004 34
28. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
29. M. Bharmal, and J. Thomas 3rd Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population Value Health 9 2006 262
30. S.H. Kim, M.W. Jo, H.J. Kim, and J.H. Ahn Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D for the assessment of cancer patients Health Qual Life Outcomes 10 2012 151
31. J. Moock, and T. Kohlmann Comparing preference-based quality-of-life measures: results from rehabilitation patients with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or psychosomatic disorders Qual Life Res 17 2008 485
32. M.J. Harrison, L.M. Davies, N.J. Bansback, M. Ingram, A.H. Anis, and D.P. Symmons The validity and responsiveness of generic utility measures in rheumatoid arthritis: a review J Rheumatol 35 2008 592
33. J. Brazier, J. Roberts, A. Tsuchiya, and J. Busschbach A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups Health Econ 13 2004 873
34. M.F. Janssen, E. Birnie, J.A. Haagsma, and G.J. Bonsel Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version Value Health 11 2008 275
35. L. Lee, N. Elfassy, and C. Li Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility J Surg Res 184 2013 108
36. C. Moriello, N.E. Mayo, L. Feldman, and F. Carli Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 2008 1083
37. C. Jones, L. Kelliher, and M. Dickinson Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection Br J Surg 100 2013 1015