Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Tessler, Michael ^a   Neumann, Johannes S ^b   Afshinnekoo, Ebrahim ^c,d,e   Pineda, Michael ^c,d   Hersch, Rebecca ^a   Velho, Luiz Felipe M ^f,g   Segovia, Bianca T ^f   Lansac Toha, Fabio A ^f   Lemke, Michael ^h   Desalle, Rob ^a   Mason, Christopher E ^c,d,i   Brugler, Mercer R ^a,j  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine   (United States)

^e NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^f STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

^g Aperfeiçoamento em Osteopatia em andamento na Escuela de Osteopatia de Madrid   (Brazil)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

ⁱ FEIL FAMILY BRAIN AND MIND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^j CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLICON; BIODIVERSITY; CLADISTICS; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; FAMILY STUDY; NUTRIENT; PIPELINE; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SAMPLING; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; BIOTA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BACTERIAL DNA; RNA 16S;

BACTERIA; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, BACTERIAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 85026644382     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06665-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Majaneva, M., Hyytiäinen, K., Varvio, S. L., Nagai, S. & Blomster, J. Bioinformatic amplicon read processing strategies strongly affect eukaryotic diversity and the taxonomic composition of communities. PLoS One 10, e0130035 (2015).
2. Guo, J., Cole, J. R., Zhang, Q., Brown, C. T. & Tiedje, J. M. Microbial Community Analysis with Ribosomal Gene Fragments from Shotgun Metagenomes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 157-166 (2015).
3. Mitra, S. et al. Analysis of the intestinal microbiota using SOLiD 16S rRNA gene sequencing and SOLiD shotgun sequencing. BMC Genomics 14, S16 (2013).
4. Schulze-Schweifing, K., Banerjee, A. & Wade, W. G. Comparison of bacterial culture and 16S rRNA community profiling by clonal analysis and pyrosequencing for the characterization of the dentine caries-associated microbiome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4, 164 (2014).
5. Mahé, F. et al. Comparing high-throughput platforms for sequencing the V4 region of SSU-rDNA in environmental microbial eukaryotic diversity surveys. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 62, 338-345 (2015).
6. Luo, C., Tsementzi, D., Kyrpides, N., Read, T. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PLoS One 7, e30087 (2012).
7. Nelson, M. C., Morrison, H. G., Benjamino, J., Grim, S. L. & Graf, J. Analysis, optimization and verification of Illumina-generated 16S rRNA gene amplicon surveys. PLoS One 9, e94249 (2014).
8. Salipante, S. J. et al. Performance comparison of Illumina and ion torrent next-generation sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA-based bacterial community profiling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 7583-7591 (2014).
9. Pylro, V. S. et al. Data analysis for 16S microbial profiling from different benchtop sequencing platforms. J. Microbiol. Methods 107, 30-37 (2014).
10. Poretsky, R., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Luo, C., Tsementzi, D. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. PLoS One 9, e93827 (2014).
11. Ranjan, R., Rani, A., Metwally, A., McGee, H. S. & Perkins, D. L. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 469, 967-977 (2016).
12. Tedersoo, L. et al. Shotgun metagenomes and multiple primer pair-barcode combinations of amplicons reveal biases in metabarcoding analyses of fungi. MycoKeys 10, 1-43 (2015).
13. Chan, C. S., Chan, K.-G., Tay, Y.-L., Chua, Y.-H. & Goh, K. M. Diversity of thermophiles in a Malaysian hot spring determined using 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenome sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 6, 177 (2015).
14. Clooney, A. G. et al. Comparing apples and oranges?: Next generation sequencing and its impact on microbiome analysis. PLoS One 11, e0148028 (2016).
15. Jovel, J. et al. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Front. Microbiol. 7, 459 (2016).
16. Tessler, M. & Brugler, M. R. et al. A global eDNA comparison of freshwater bacterioplankton assemblages focusing on large-river floodplain lakes of Brazil. Microb. Ecol., 73, 61-74 (2017).
17. Newton, R. J., Jones, S. E., Eiler, A., McMahon, K. D. & Bertilsson, S. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 14-49 (2011).
18. MetaSUB International Consortium. The Metagenomics and Metadesign of the Subways and Urban Biomes (MetaSUB) International Consortium inaugural meeting report. Microbiome 4, 24 (2016).
19. Caporaso, J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621-1624 (2012).
20. Fierer, N. et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21390-21395 (2012).
21. Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633-42 (2014).
22. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590-6 (2013).
23. McDonald, D. et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610-618 (2012).
24. Logares, R. et al. Metagenomic 16S rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2659-2671 (2014).
25. Neeson, T. M., Van Rijn, I. & Mandelik, Y. How taxonomic diversity, community structure, and sample size determine the reliability of higher taxon surrogates. Ecol. Appl. 23, 1216-1225 (2013).
26. Chen, J. et al. Associating microbiome composition with environmental covariates using generalized UniFrac distances. Bioinformatics 28, 2106-2113 (2012).
27. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207-214 (2012).
28. Darling, A. E. et al. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ 2, e243 (2014).
29. Vernikos, G., Medini, D., Riley, D. R. & Tettelin, H. Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 23, 148-154 (2015).
30. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods 9, 811-814 (2012).
31. Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 902-903 (2015).
32. Afshinnekoo, E. et al. Geospatial resolution of human and bacterial diversity with city-scale metagenomics. Cell Syst 1, 72-87 (2015).
33. Mason, C. E., Afshinnekoo, E., Tighe, S., Wu, S. & Levy, S. International standards for genomes, transcriptomes, and metagenomes. J Biomol Tech. 28, 8-18 (2017).
34. Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261-5267 (2007).
35. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2013).
36. Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R-package version 2 (2013).
37. Yergeau, E. et al. Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7626-7637 (2012).
38. Shakya, M. et al. Comparative metagenomic and rRNA microbial diversity characterization using archaeal and bacterial synthetic communities. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1882-1899 (2013).
39. Quail, M. A. et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 13, 341 (2012).