Facilitating prospective registration of diagnostic accuracy studies: A STARD initiative

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1331-1341

  Korevaar, Daniël A ^a   Hooft, Lotty ^b   Askie, Lisa M ^c   Barbour, Virginia ^d   Faure, Hélène ^e   Gatsonis, Constantine A ^f   Hunter, Kylie E ^c   Kressel, Herbert Y ^g   Lippman, Hannah ^e   McInnes, Matthew D F ^h   Moher, David ⁱ   Rifai, Nader ^h   Cohen, Jérèmie F ^j,k   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^e BIOMED CENTRAL   (United Kingdom)

^f BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

ⁱ OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^j BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNDING; HUMAN; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER; SCIENTIST; DIAGNOSIS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

DATA ACCURACY; DIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; REGISTRIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85026537794     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: 15308561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.272765     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, et al. Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 2014;383:101-4.
2. Moher D, Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Nasser M, Bossuyt PM, Korevaar DA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?. Lancet 2016; 387:1573-86.
3. Dickersin K, Rennie D. The evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterprise. JAMA 2012;307:1861-4.
4. De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Is this clinical trial fully registered?-a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New Engl J Med 2005;352:2436 -8.
5. Viergever RF, Li K. Trends in global clinical trial registration: An analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008932.
6. van de Wetering FT, Scholten RJ, Haring T, Clarke M, Hooft L. Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications. PLoS One 2012;7:e49599.
7. Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: Analysis of recent study reports. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004596.
8. Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Spijker R, Saldanha IJ, Dickersin K, Virgili G, et al. Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;79:96 -103.
9. Altman DG. The time has come to register diagnostic and prognostic research. Clin Chem 2014;60:580 -2.
10. Rifai N, Altman DG, Bossuyt PM. Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: Time for action. Clin Chem 2008;54:1101-3.
11. Rifai N, Bossuyt PM, Ioannidis JP, Bray KR, McShane LM, Golub RM, Hooft L. Registering diagnostic and prognostic trials of tests: Is it the right thing to do?. Clin Chem 2014;60:1146 -52.
12. Hooft L, Assendelft WJ, Hoeksema HL, Scholten RJ. [A national prospective trial register for randomised controlled trials: Ethical and practical necessity]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:1866 -9.
13. Linnet K, Bossuyt PM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB. Quantifying the accuracy of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 2012;58:1292-301.
14. Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Prospective registration of marker evaluation studies: Time to act. Clin Chem 2011;57: 1684 -6.
15. World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310: 2191-4.
16. Korevaar DA, Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Clin Chem 2014;60:651-9.
17. Brazzelli M, Lewis SC, Deeks JJ, Sandercock PA. No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:425-30.
18. Wilson C, Kerr D, Noel-Storr A, Quinn TJ. Associations with publication and assessing publication bias in dementia diagnostic test accuracy studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015;30:1250 -6.
19. Korevaar DA, van Es N, Zwinderman AH, Cohen JF, Bossuyt PM. Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: Associated with reported accuracy estimates. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16: 68.
20. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Hooft L. Identification of additional trials in prospective trial registers for Cochrane systematic reviews. PLoS One 2012;7:e42812.
21. Jones CW, Keil LG, Weaver MA, Platts-Mills TF. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional analysis. Syst Rev 2014;3:126.
22. Mathieu S, Chan AW, Ravaud P. Use of trial register information during the peer review process. PLoS One 2013;8:e59910.
23. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 2015;61:1446 -52.
24. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Hooft L, et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799.
25. Scherer RW, Huynh L, Ervin AM, Taylor J, Dickersin K. ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: A comparison study. BMC Med Res Meth 2013;13:79.
26. Hunter K, Vu T, Sausa R, Tan-Koay A, Ko H, Askie L. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) user survey results from 2009 and 2015. Cochrane Colloquium, Vienna, 2015. https://abstracts.cochrane. org/2015-vienna/australian-new-zealand-clinicaltrials-registry-anzctr-user-survey-results-2009-and-2015 (Accessed April 2017).
27. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:1093-1104.
28. Altman DG, Furberg CD, Grimshaw JM, Shanahan DR. Linked publications from a single trial: A thread of evidence. Trials 2014;15:369.
29. Lippman H. Diagnostic accuracy: 60% of the time, it works every time [blog]. BioMed Central. http://blogs. biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2016/01/22/ diagnostic-accuracy-60-time-works-every-time/ (Accessed April 2017).
30. Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, et al. Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: The development of STARD 2015. Research Integrity and Peer Review 2016;1:7.