Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Mathieu, Sylvain ^a,b   Chan, An Wen ^c   Ravaud, Philippe ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION STORAGE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; REGISTER; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84876047415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059910     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291(20): 2457-2465.
2. Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG, (2004) Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ 171(7): 735-740.
3. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, et al. (2008) Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 3(8): e3081.
4. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, et al. (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 292(11): 1363-1364.
5. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, et al. (2008) CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 5(1): e20.
6. Dickersin K, Rennie D, (2003) Registering clinical trials. JAMA 290(4): 516-523.
7. Mills EJ, Wu P, Gagnier J, Devereaux PJ, (2005) The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement. Contemp Clin Trials 26(4): 480-487.
8. Reveiz L, Krleza-Jerić K, Chan AW, De Aguiar S, (2007) Do trialists endorse clinical trial registration? Survey of a PubMed sample. Trials 2007 8: 30.
9. Berg JO, (2007) Clinical trial registries [reply]. JAMA 298(13): 1514.
10. Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC, (2005) Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med 353(26): 2779-2787.
11. Sekeres M, Gold JL, Chan AW, Lexchin J, Moher D, et al. (2008) Poor reporting of scientific leadership information in clinical trial registers. PLoS One 3(2): e1610.
12. Al-Marzouki S, Roberts I, Evans S, Marshall T, (2008) Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet 372 (9634): 201.
13. Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM, (2009) Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: across-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 6(9): e1000144.
14. Huic M, Marusic M, Marusic A, (2011) Completeness and changes in registered data and reporting bias of randomized controlled trials in ICMJE journals after trial registration policy. PLoS One 6(9): e25258.
15. Reveiz L, Cortés-Jofré M, Asenjo Lobos C, Nicita G, Ciapponi A, et al. (2010) Iberoamerican Cochrane Network. Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: study from highest ranked journals. J Clin Epidemiol 63(11): 1216-1222.
16. Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Califf RM, Ide NC, (2011) The ClinicalTrials.gov results database - update and key issues. N Engl J Med 364(9): 852-860.
17. Nankervis H, Baibergenova A, Williams HC, Thomas KS, (2012) Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review. J Invest Dermatol 132(12): 2727-2734.
18. Ewart R, Lausen H, Millian N, (2009) Undisclosed changes in outcomes in randomized controlled trials: an observational study. Ann Fam Med 7(6): 542-546.
19. Moja LP, Moschetti I, Nurbhai M, Compagnoni A, Liberati A, et al. (2009) Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey. Trials 10: 56.
20. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman D, Ravaud P, (2009) Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA 302(9): 977-984.
21. Mathieu S, Giraudeau B, Soubrier M, Ravaud P, (2012) Misleading abstract conclusions in randomized controlled trials: Comparison between the abstract conclusions and the results section. Joint Bone Spine 79(3): 262-267.
22. Viergever RF, Ghersi D, (2011) The quality of registration of clinical trials. PLoS One 6(2): e14701.
23. Law n° 2004-806 (09/08/2004) related to politics in public health (L1121-1). Published in: Journal Officiel de la République Française, 11/08/2004. Available http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000025104470&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&dateTexte=20121126&fastPos=5&fastReqId=5261883&oldAction=rechCodeArticle. Accessed 2013 Feb 25.
24. Robinson KA, Dickersin K, (2002) Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol 31(1): 150-153.
25. Braithwaite D, Emery J, De Lusignan S, Sutton S, (2003) Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 20(5): 545-551.
26. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J, (2002) Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res 4(2): E13.
27. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, et al. (2004) Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison. J Med Internet Res 6(4): e39.