Urban expansion and wetland shrinkage estimation using a GIS-based model in the East Kolkata Wetland, India

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 83, Issue , 2017, Pages 62-73

  Mondal, Biswajit ^a   Dolui, Gour ^b   Pramanik, Malay ^a   Maity, Santu ^a   Biswas, Sumantra Sarathi ^a   Pal, Raghunath ^a  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b VIDYASAGAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

East Kolkata wetland; SimWeight; Urban growth; Wetland shrinkage monitoring (WSM) model; Wetland transition

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; SHRINKAGE; URBAN GROWTH;

COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SHRINKAGE ESTIMATIONS; SIMWEIGHT; SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION; TRANSITION PROCESS; WETLAND DEGRADATIONS; WETLAND TRANSITION;

WETLANDS;

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; GIS; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LAND USE PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION; WETLAND;

EAST KOLKATA WETLANDS; INDIA; WEST BENGAL;

EID: 85026405992     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aljoufie, M., Brussel, M., Zuidgeest, M., Maarseveen Van, M., Urban growth and transport infrastructure interaction in Jeddah between 1980 and 2007. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform. 21 (2013), 493–505, 10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.006.
2. Ancog, R., Ruzol, C., Urbanisation adjacent to a wetland of international importance: the case of olango island wildlife sanctuary, metro cebu, Philippines. Habitat Int. 49 (2015), 325–332, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.007.
3. Van Asselen, S., Verburg, P.H., Vermaat, J.E., Janse, J.H., Drivers of wetland conversion: a global meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 8(11), 2013, e81292, 10.1371/journal.pone.0081292.
4. Bassi, N., Kumar, M.D., Sharma, A., Pardha-Saradhi, P., Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystems benefits, threats and management strategies. J.f Hydrol. Reg. Studies 2 (2014), 1–19, 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001.
5. Batista e Silva, F., Koomen, E., Diogo, V., Lavalle, C., Estimating demand for industrial and commercial land use given economic forecasts. PLoS One, 9(3), 2014, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091991.
6. Baum-Snow, N., Did highways cause suburbanisation?. Q. J. Econ. 122:2 (2007), 775–805, 10.1162/qjec.122.2.775.
7. Bendor, T., A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landscape Urban Plann. 89:1–2 (2009), 17–27, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.09.003.
8. Beuel, S., Alvarez, M., Amler, E., Behn, K., Kotze, D., Kreye, C., Leemhuis, C., Wagner, K., Kyalo, D., Ziegler, S., Becker, M., A rapid assessment of anthropogenic disturbances in East African wetlands. Ecol. Indic. 67 (2016), 684–692, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.034.
9. Board, M.A., Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. 2005, New Island, Washington, DC.
10. Bose, P.S., Urban Development in India: Global Indians in the Remaking of Kolkata, Vol. 1, 2015, Routledge.
11. Bunting, S.W., Pretty, J., Edwards, P., Wastewater-fed aquaculture in the East Kolkata Wetlands, India: anachronism or archetype for resilient ecocultures?. Rev. Aquacult. 2:3 (2010), 138–153, 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01031.x.
12. Chen, L., Jin, Z., Michishita, R., Cai, J., Yue, T., Chen, B., Xu, B., Dynamic monitoring of wetland cover changes using time-series remote sensing imagery. Ecol. Inform. 24 (2014), 17–26, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.06.007.
13. Chen, K., Wang, X., Li, D., Li, Z., Driving force of the morphological change of the urban lake ecosystems: a case study of Wuhan. Ecol. Modell. 318 (2015), 1990–2013, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.017.
14. Congalton, R.G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ. 37:1 (1991), 35–46 (Available at: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=5314872.).
15. Dasgupta, K., A city divided? Planning and urban sprawl in the eastern fringes of Calcutta. Indian Cities in Transition, 2007, Orient Longman, New Delhi, 5.
16. Dembowski, H., Taking the State to Court: Public Interest Litigation and the Public Sphere in Metropolitan India. 2001, Oxford University Press, USA.
17. Dey, D., Banerjee, S., Ecosystem and livelihood support: the story of east Kolkata wetlands. Environ. Urbanisation Asia 4:2 (2013), 325–337, 10.1177/0975425313511158.
18. Eastman, R., Idrisi Selva: Guide to GIS and Image Processing, Manual Version 17.01. 2012, Clark University, Worcester, MA USA, 324.
19. Ehrenfeld, J.G., Evaluating wetlands within an urban context. Ecol. Eng. 15:3-4 (2000), 253–265, 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00080-X.
20. Ghosh, D., Sen, S., Ecological history of Calcutta wetland conversion. Environ. Conserv. 14:3 (1987), 219–226, 10.1017/S0376892900016416.
21. Halabisky, M., Moskal, L.M., Gillespie, A., Hannam, M., Remote Sensing of Environment Reconstructing semi-arid wetland surface water dynamics through spectral mixture analysis of a time series of Landsat satellite images (1984–2011). Remote Sensing Environ. 177 (2016), 171–183, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.040.
22. He, C., Tian, J., Shi, P., Hu, D., Simulation of the spatial stress due to urban expansion on the wetlands in Beijing, China using a GIS-based assessment model. Landscape Urban Plann. 101:3 (2011), 269–277, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.032.
23. Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T.H., Wickramasinghe, D., Mapa, R., De Alwis, A., McAlpine, C.A., The eco-social transformation of urban wetlands: a case study of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Landscape Urban Plann. 132:0 (2014), 55–68, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.006.
24. Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T.H., McAlpine, C., Forty-three years of Ramsar and urban wetlands. Global Environ. Change 32 (2015), 57–66, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.009.
25. Hoa, T., Dao, H., Saborowski, J., Hölscher, D., Patterns of tree community differences in the core and buffer zones of a nature reserve in north-western Vietnam. Global Ecol. Conserv. 8 (2016), 220–229, 10.1016/j.gecco.2016.09.011.
26. Hopkinson, C., Horrigan, K., Cane, T., Gaborit, S., McLernon, S., Pennington, S., Quon, S., Woo, L., Mulamoottil, G., Jasinsky, P., McTavish, M., An integrated approach to the planning and management of urban wetlands: the case of bechtel park wetland, Waterloo, Ontario. Can. Water Res. J. 22:1 (1997), 45–56, 10.4296/cwrj2201045.
27. Jia, H., Ma, H., Wei, M., Urban wetland planning: a case study in the Beijing central region. Ecol. Complexity 8:2 (2011), 213–221, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.03.002.
28. Li, Y., Zhu, X., Sun, X., Wang, F., Landscape effects of environmental impact on Bay-area wetlands under rapid urban expansion and development policy: a case study of Lianyungang, China. Landscape Urban Plann. 94:3–4 (2010), 218–227, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.006.
29. Li, Y., Shi, Y., Qureshi, S., Bruns, A., Zhu, X., Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface. Ecol. Indic. 42 (2014), 135–146, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.032.
30. Ma, C., Zhang, G.Y., Zhang, X.C., Zhao, Y.J., Li, H.Y., Application of Markov model in wetland change dynamics in Tianjin Coastal Area, China. Procedia Environ. Sci., 13, 2012, 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.024.
31. Malekmohammadi, B., Jahanishakib, F., Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. Ecol. Indic. 82 (2017), 293–303, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.060.
32. Mas, J., Kolb, M., Paegelow, M., Teresa, M., Olmedo, C., Houet, T., Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: a comparison of four software packages. Environ. Modell. Softw 51 (2014), 94–111, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.010.
33. Mozumder, C., Tripathi, N.K., Losiri, C., Comparing three transition potential models: a case study of built-up transitions in North-East India. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 59 (2016), 38–49, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.009.
34. Nicholls, R.J., Hoozemans, F.M.J., Marchand, M., Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses. Glob. Environ. Change, 9(S1), 1999, 69e87.
35. Parihar, S.M., Sarkar, S., Dutta, A., Sharma, S., Dutta, T., Characterizing wetland dynamics: a post-classification change detection analysis of the East Kolkata Wetlands using open source satellite data. Geocarto Int. 28:3 (2013), 273–287, 10.1080/10106049.2012.705337.
36. Pontius, R.G., Schneider, L.C., Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85 (2001), 239–248.
37. K. Rajashekariah, 2011. Impact of Urbanisation on Biodiversity: Case Studies from India, Retrieved from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/impact_of_urbanisation_on_biodiversity.pdf.
38. Sangermano, F., Eastman, J.R., Zhu, H., Similarity-Weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Trans. GIS 14:5 (2010), 569–580, 10.1111/j. 1467–9671.2010.01226.x.
39. Sarkar, S., Parihar, S.M., Dutta, A., Environmental modelling & software fuzzy risk assessment modelling of east Kolkata wetland area: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. Environ. Modell. Software 75 (2016), 105–118, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.003.
40. Sengupta, U., Inclusive development? A state-led land development model in New Town, Kolkata. Environ. Plann. C: Government Policy 31:1 (2013), 357–376, 10.1068/c1103.
41. Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., Helbich, M., Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: a Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model. Appl. Geogr. 40 (2013), 140–149, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.009.
42. Shaw, A., Satish, M.K., Metropolitan restructuring in post-liberalized India: separating the global and the local. Cities 24:2 (2007), 148–163, 10.1016/j.cities.2006.02.001.
43. Sica, Y. V, Quintana, R.D., Radeloff, V.C., Gavier-pizarro, G.I., Wetland loss due to land use change in the Lower Paraná River Delta, Argentina. Sci. Total Environ., 2016, 568, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.200.
44. Turner, R.K., Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Soderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., Van der Straaten, J., Maltby, E., Van Ierland, E.C., Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol. Econ. 35:1 (2000), 7–23, 10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00164-6.
45. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015. World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2014 Revision, (ST/ESA/SER.A/366).
46. Weng, Q., Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. J. Environ. Manage. 64:3 (2002), 273–284, 10.1006/jema.2001.0509.
47. Yu, H., He, Z., Pan, X., Wetlands shrink simulation using cellular automata: a case study in sanjiang plain, China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2:5 (2010), 225–233, 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.027.
48. Zedler, J.B., Kercher, S., Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ Res. 30:1 (2005), 39–74.
49. Zeng, X.T., Zhao, J.Y., Yang, X.L., Wang, X., Xu, C.W., Cui, L., Zhou, Y., A land-indicator-based optimization model with trading mechanism in wetland ecosystem under uncertainty. Ecol. Indic. 74 (2017), 479–499, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.011.
50. Zhang, W.W., Yao, L., Li, H., Sun, D.F., Zhou, L.D., Sciences research on land use change in beijing hanshiqiao wetland nature reserve using remote sensing and GIS. Procedia Environ. Sci. 10 (2011), 583–588, 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.094.
51. Zhao, Q., Bai, J., Huang, L., Gu, B., Lu, Q., A review of methodologies and success indicators for coastal wetland restoration. Ecol. Indic. 60 (2016), 442–452, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.003.